dcs18 Posted September 15, 2017 Author Share Posted September 15, 2017 2 hours ago, Undertaker said: The question is in my earlier laptop, I was using MPC-BE standalone without anything extra because of HW incompetency. Do you recommend I should now pair it up with LAV filters and madVR? Yes, of course — anything from Core i3 upwards deserves it. 2 hours ago, Undertaker said: Can you also tell me what difference I will have in say, quality - CPU - RAM usage etc, with just MPC-BE, and then pair it up with LAV filters and finally have the company of madVR with the two. madVR is a little monster — it also delivers the biggest bang in terms of quality. I'd suggest using madVR, first — and then, LAV Filters (after you get the hang of it.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 9 hours ago, dcs18 said: I'd suggest using madVR, first — and then, LAV Filters (after you get the hang of it.) Hmmm, I read some articles and post and most of them suggest installing lav filters first. Why is the order important and what is the purpose of each? I also had ppl suggesting that we should use the x86 version of MPC because it has better compatibility with madVR. I'll be going by the default settings till I find a simple understanding guide. Will I have some enhancement in quality even with the default settings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 16, 2017 Author Share Posted September 16, 2017 1 hour ago, Undertaker said: Hmmm, I read some articles and post and most of them suggest installing lav filters first. Why is the order important and what is the purpose of each? I don't see the correlation. 1 hour ago, Undertaker said: I also had ppl suggesting that we should use the x86 version of MPC because it has better compatibility with madVR. This one is history — the madVR directory contains both architecture. 1 hour ago, Undertaker said: I'll be going by the default settings till I find a simple understanding guide. Will I have some enhancement in quality even with the default settings? Sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 52 minutes ago, dcs18 said: I don't see the correlation. Nothing I just wanted to know if the order of installation matters? Bcuz you wanted me to try madVR before LAV and soem guides I found were saying vice-versa. That's why I asked is order of installation an important thing here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 16, 2017 Author Share Posted September 16, 2017 madVR returns incredibly differing results on different hardware — therefore, following a guide would not really be prudent. The best plan would be trial-n-error. Installing them at 2 different points in time would ensure that one is not confused with the source of the results — as stated, madVR delivers more bang and hence was recommended for first installation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 @dcs18 Are you online? Check your PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recruit Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 1 hour ago, Undertaker said: Are you online? Looks like not . Guess he's to some amazing places that I have seen to Eurosport in the campaign called " Incredible India " I envy you guys, even if my country is beautiful too.... Every time I saw those clips when I watched to US Open I thought that through those places could be my friends from nsane @dcs18 & @Undertaker ! Sorry for the off-topic guys, just I said what I felt , considering that is the most open topic from nsane ! Very delighted I met you, guys ! Regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rach Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 @Undertaker hi, I always wanted to ask you something. By any chance, are you Taker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 1 hour ago, rach said: @Undertaker hi, I always wanted to ask you something. By any chance, are you Taker? Yep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 18, 2017 Author Share Posted September 18, 2017 GBWhatsApp is now 5.90. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 18, 2017 Author Share Posted September 18, 2017 SuperSU is now 2.82 SR4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 19, 2017 Author Share Posted September 19, 2017 Adguard AdBlocker add-on is now 2.7.2 Beta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 20, 2017 Author Share Posted September 20, 2017 DD-WRT is now 33375 Beta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 20, 2017 Author Share Posted September 20, 2017 On 8/17/2017 at 10:09 AM, Undertaker said: Had a system breakdown in the last couple of days. The person at Nehru Place suggested my system maynot be compatible enough for W10. So now running the suggested OS - W7 Professional. Hope your new Windows 10 didn't screw your happiness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 20, 2017 Author Share Posted September 20, 2017 1 hour ago, 0bin said: 11 hours ago, dcs18 said: DD-WRT is now 33375 Beta. Once taken this path, you cannot go back Only way is through serial. You cannot restore original firmware or previous builds through this build. The USB automount still not work. Maybe dd-wrt need someone teaching them how to make builds? Why won't one be able to go back 0bin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recruit Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Hey @dcs18 , I haven't seen @Undertaker here, lately ! Hope he is fine, bro ! Same about you, Man ! Greetings, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 23, 2017 Author Share Posted September 23, 2017 All good here, bro. — no idea about Undertaker though (thought he was maybe facing computer problems.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recruit Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 1 hour ago, dcs18 said: All good here, bro. Cool , happy to hear it ! 1 hour ago, dcs18 said: no idea about Undertaker though (thought he was maybe facing computer problems.) Hope to be only computer issues & maybe you need to give him a hand : Spoiler Take care ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 24, 2017 Author Share Posted September 24, 2017 20 hours ago, 0bin said: It's now SD Maid 4.8.1 Beta... I think the 4.8.1 is now final. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 I had an exam yesterday so was preparing for it. That's all. No life problems, only some l'il software problems. In the meanwhile, have paired Acrylic DNS proxy with Dnscrypt-proxy for my system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 15 minutes ago, Undertaker said: In the meanwhile, have paired Acrylic DNS proxy with Dnscrypt-proxy for my system. While earlier, SimpleDNScrypt was giving me ping times in excess of 80 ms; using DNScrypt-proxy(BikinHappy Singapore server) with Acrylic DNS proxy on my 1 Mbps connection(after FUP), the result are as follows:- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 25, 2017 Author Share Posted September 25, 2017 7 hours ago, Undertaker said: While earlier, SimpleDNScrypt was giving me ping times in excess of 80 ms; using DNScrypt-proxy(BikinHappy Singapore server) with Acrylic DNS proxy on my 1 Mbps connection(after FUP), the result are as follows:- Suspect that if you retest with your Adguard disabled, the ping time would improve even further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 33 minutes ago, dcs18 said: Suspect that if you retest with your Adguard disabled, the ping time would improve even further. Maybe, but that's not an ideal scenario, because there is a need to run adguard at all the times, so disabling it would not show the right result I'm going to experience in real-life browsing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 25, 2017 Author Share Posted September 25, 2017 I'm referring to just a test — not for a all-time scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 With ADG enabled:- With ADG disabled:- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.