dcs18 Posted December 6, 2015 Author Share Posted December 6, 2015 It is now SuperSU 2.60 Beta (for Root Users only.)For Users who update SuperSU, via their Recovery (recommended — Developer's homepage):— Site: http://dl-1.va.us.xda-developers.com Sharecode[?]: /3/5/6/5/9/7/7/SuperSU-v2.60-20151205163135.zip?key=NZHJAEwTRDGX2c0R6I2TGw&ts=1449376519 For Users who update SuperSU, through conventional apk installation:— Site: http://www.mediafire.com Sharecode[?]: /download/m2kz5xz2c1l68qf/Superuser.rar Changelog:— 05.12.2015 - v2.60 — BETA - (systemless) Fixed ZIP installer breaking Pro - (systemless) Added automatic kernel patcher to ZIP installer - (systemless) Added sukernel tool - (systemless) Bind mount /system/[x]bin/su to /su/bin/su - (systemless) Fixed cleanup options in settings - (systemless) Now available for 5.1.x (by default for Samsung only, full unroot/reflash system before update) - Made reworked context switching available to 5.1.x (testing, should come to more APIs soon) - Fixed recursive mount issue on Samsung 5.1.x that could ultimately lead to root being lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamBidyuT Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 I have a question in mind :rolleyes: In TeamViewer while starting video conversation from one side, the other side's partner also need to accept/resume the conversation by clicking on the in teamviewer's my video window . . . Means, without his permission we can't enable his session from our side . . . So, is there any tweak to enable partner's video session from this side ? :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kantry123 Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 On 12/6/2015 at 11:28 AM, Taker said: On 12/5/2015 at 7:39 AM, Taker said: Have made a shift to ABP+EHH now....looks like the bugs we were talking about yday and before have been dealt with now. :D Just can't bear any other adblocker now....I'm addicted :ganja:Back to square one .... :bag:Adguard for Windows FTW :win: BTW read sumthing worth sharing(This is not me) : http://s7.postimg.org/cua2sra2j/Capture.png any reason to be back on AG? regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/6/2015 at 5:12 AM, IamBidyuT said: I have a question in mind :rolleyes: In TeamViewer while starting video conversation from one side, the other side's partner also need to accept/resume the conversation by clicking on the in teamviewer's my video window . . . Means, without his permission we can't enable his session from our side . . . So, is there any tweak to enable partner's video session from this side ? :unsure:Unfortunately, my system does not have a Web Cam — hence, there is no way (for me) to check on the video function of TeamViewer. Hope someone else can throw light on the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/6/2015 at 11:28 AM, Taker said: BTW read sumthing worth sharing(This is not me) : http://s7.postimg.org/cua2sra2j/Capture.pngYeah, those who have enjoyed advanced & effective ad. blockers like Adguard and Adblock Plus would never stoop down to uBlock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kantry123 Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 5:51 AM, dcs18 said: On 12/6/2015 at 11:28 AM, Taker said: BTW read sumthing worth sharing(This is not me) : http://s7.postimg.org/cua2sra2j/Capture.pngYeah, those who have enjoyed advanced & effective ad. blockers like Adguard and Adblock Plus would never stoop down to uBlock. :lol: :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Share Posted December 7, 2015 Hmmm — looks like ad. blocking rules will need to be updated for the new Board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 12:14 PM, dcs18 said: Hmmm — looks like ad. blocking rules will need to be updated for the new Board. Expand not if u use adguard :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 12:36 PM, knowledge said: not if u use adguard :) Expand Can you post a full page scrolling screenshot of this page with your Adguard enabled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 1:46 PM, dcs18 said: On 12/7/2015 at 1:46 PM, dcs18 said: Can you post a full page scrolling screenshot of this page with your Adguard enabled? Expand Can you post a full page scrolling screenshot of this page with your Adguard enabled? Expand On 12/7/2015 at 1:46 PM, dcs18 said: Can you post a full page scrolling screenshot of this page with your Adguard enabled? Expand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Share Posted December 7, 2015 Well knowledge, I am afraid Adguard will also need rules to be updated for the new Board — thanks for the screenshot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 2:06 PM, dcs18 said: Well knowledge, I am afraid Adguard will also need rules to be updated for the new Board — thanks for the screenshot. Expand y u say that i not see no ads ? or did i miss something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 2:10 PM, knowledge said: y u say that i not see no ads ? or did i miss something? Expand The V4 ships with less scope for blocks and more scope for hiding elements — meaning, you will hardly find much difference with your ad. blocker enabled/disabled. However, one would have to now make more use of element blocking — meaning, ad. blockers with weaker element hiders (read — uBlock) could be screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 2:36 PM, Taker said: If it stays that way, I'm planning to give it an all black look : http://i.imgur.com/tBR8kWP.png Expand Quote black seems nice i just seen now i cant follow this topic when i click the follow i see bs ? or is it just me Expand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kantry123 Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 LOl damn me my uBlock is screwed up no matter how many times i install this happens ITS BLOCKING BUT UI is F**ked UP :P regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hihello Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 6:03 PM, kantry123 said: LOl damn me my uBlock is screwed up no matter how many times i install this happens ITS BLOCKING BUT UI is F**ked UP :P regards Expand Won't you switch back to adguard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kantry123 Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 6:11 PM, hihello said: Won't you switch back to adguard? Expand i woild have but AG screws up my Internet speeds thats y i prefer uB and ABP uses twice the memory of my FF uses currently regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 6:53 PM, kantry123 said: i woild have but AG screws up my Internet speeds thats y i prefer uB and ABP uses twice the memory of my FF uses currently regards Expand may be u try adguard addon i use adguard may be we can think of a way to stop the screws up your Internet speeds but i cant think y adguard play your speed up but i sure we think of a way passed this little problem u have with adguard ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Share Posted December 7, 2015 It is now WhatsApp Messenger 2.12.376 (Direct download.) and X-plore File Manager 3.76.08 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 8, 2015 Author Share Posted December 8, 2015 On 12/7/2015 at 6:53 PM, kantry123 said: thats y i prefer uB and ABP uses twice the memory of my FF uses currently regards Expand JFTR, I am curious to know what was the method you employed to measure the resource consumption? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kantry123 Posted December 8, 2015 Share Posted December 8, 2015 On 12/8/2015 at 11:48 AM, dcs18 said: JFTR, I am curious to know what was the method you employed to measure the resource consumption? Expand I basically install the ADDON and open my regular sites like NSANE ,Utube and softexia,majorgeeks,askvg and Redmondppie etc and my usage with uBlock is 290MB AND with ABP installed and UB disabled my usage with same TABS usage is 590mb regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 8, 2015 Author Share Posted December 8, 2015 On 12/8/2015 at 12:15 PM, kantry123 said: I basically install the ADDON and open my regular sites like NSANE ,Utube and softexia,majorgeeks,askvg and Redmondppie etc and my usage with uBlock is 290MB AND with ABP installed and UB disabled my usage with same TABS usage is 590mb regards Expand That is not the correct method to measure memory consumption of add-ons on an independent basis — you could be causing 2 ad. blocking add-ons to munge against each other regardless of whether uBlock was merely disabled (instead, uBlock should have been completely uninstalled while measuring Adblock Plus and vice versa.) As for the measurement itself, you gotta use about:memory and check for individual add-on consumption. Please note, the latest beta Adblock Plus with the latest Beta Firefox would deliver optimum results. The above points are being raised without the Firemin factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 9, 2015 Author Share Posted December 9, 2015 It is now WhatsApp Messenger 2.12.377 (Direct download.) and X-plore File Manager 3.76.09. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 10, 2015 Author Share Posted December 10, 2015 It is now WhatsApp Messenger 2.12.380 (Direct download.) and Business Calendar 2.9.0 Beta 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 10, 2015 Author Share Posted December 10, 2015 Added 4 new about:config entries to the Classic Theme Restorer (CTR) tutorial (relevance 1.4.5 beta 3 and above) — refer to the Changelog for further details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.