bubbada Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 no matter what i do to the folder i cant get the batch to show. did you try thisyep i hav done everything i can think ofNote: for quite a while now my ips are blocked with comodo and executable is patched i have no probs there, i wanted to see how well the trial theory worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dukun Cabul Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 no matter what i do to the folder i cant get the batch to show. did you try thisyep i hav done everything i can think ofNote: for quite a while now my ips are blocked with comodo and executable is patched i have no probs there, i wanted to see how well the trial theory worked.WeirdTry manually navigate/browse using file explorer ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 8, 2015 Author Share Posted July 8, 2015 :s :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 8, 2015 Author Share Posted July 8, 2015 The latest IDM CC 7.3.100 add-on made compatible for Users of the latest Firefox tested working on the V40 (Users of higher versions - please report whether it is working, for you):—https://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ozfp8bp6uz3vu10 Still getting error message with v4.0 b2Yes, you are right — better to wait for the new IDM release. :(Little wonder we were failing - IDM now, requires 2 add-ons to defeat the new add-on-signing, implemented by Mozilla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kantry123 Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 :s :blink:yep u r rytregards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
subsystem Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 hi dcs18a new IDM update mean a new IP to add to block list :lol:just discovered a new IP today169.55.0.227 >> http://tejji.com/ip/url-to-ip-address.aspx?domain=secure.internetdownloadmanager.comjust visit 169.55.0.227 with your browser and it'll display idm homepagePS: sorry idm dev team :tehe: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamBidyuT Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 :s :blink:No issue for me here :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taker Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 <<snip>> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 8, 2015 Author Share Posted July 8, 2015 :s :blink:No issue for me here :) Check out my finding with Firefox 40 Beta 2 on a fresh new Mozilla profile:— Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
subsystem Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Think I gave him this IP via PM sumtym back :dunno:well, actually when I see a new idm version update,I decide to check idm homepage at atsameip.com if there is a missing IP on the block list.http://atsameip.intercode.ca/index_3.1.php?domain=www.internetdownloadmanager.com&siadunno if this IP was discovered before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taker Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 <<snip>> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taker Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 <<snip>> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 8, 2015 Author Share Posted July 8, 2015 Check out my finding with Firefox 40 Beta 2 on a fresh new Mozilla profile:—You seem to be adding both the .xpi file, is it so?Nope, no manual addition was made — did you try on a clean profile? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
subsystem Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 This IP is not new in the sense that it was there when the first of the 169.xx.xx..xx series, IP was found.It has always been in existent since then using the same url. ;)then, why idm did not try to call this IP when it's not yet on the block list.a bit weird, :think:does it mean this IP not contains signature key to verify SN online ?or is idm only calling homepage then redirected to IP which contains signature key to verify SN online ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 8, 2015 Author Share Posted July 8, 2015 This IP is not new in the sense that it was there when the first of the 169.xx.xx..xx series, IP was found.It has always been in existent since then using the same url. ;)then, why idm did not try to call this IP when it's not yet on the block list.a bit weird, :think:does it mean this IP not contains signature key to verify SN online ?or is idm only calling homepage then redirected to IP which contains signature key to verify SN online ?IDM does not call home on every IP that is owned by its Publisher, Tonec — it does not even call on the 25th IP which you had suggested. :)Your suggested IP was included only on an inclusive basis — just as an additional insurance. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 8, 2015 Author Share Posted July 8, 2015 :s :blink:No issue for me here :) My apologies, just used a new Firefox profile and installed IDM fresh - only one IDM is now detected . . . . . . . . you were right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamBidyuT Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 My apologies, just used a new Firefox profile and installed IDM fresh - only one IDM is now detected . . . . . . . . you were right. :cheers: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 8, 2015 Author Share Posted July 8, 2015 It is now, Process Lasso 8.5.0.9 Beta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dukun Cabul Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 then, why idm did not try to call this IP when it's not yet on the block list.a bit weird, :think:does it mean this IP not contains signature key to verify SN online ?or is idm only calling homepage then redirected to IP which contains signature key to verify SN online ?Just to make sure which IP is being called when I click update ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmedion Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 Hi, Anyone knows how to integrate the new IDM add-on in Cyberfox please ? thanks in advance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 9, 2015 Author Share Posted July 9, 2015 Hi, Anyone knows how to integrate the new IDM add-on in Cyberfox please ? thanks in advanceFrom the IDM GUI, you can use Add browser and then browse to the Cyberfox installation to select your Cyberfox executable, as illustrated below:-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 9, 2015 Author Share Posted July 9, 2015 There is a free gift waiting for Users of patches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thunderpants Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 Kaspersky or ESET ESS ?I've been an Eset user for a long time ,but i'm not a fan of their new gui :(Yet another program forcing the fugly metro crap on us.Is Kaspersky as good as ESET ?Eset has done a good job protecting my computer ,but if Kaspersky has better gui i might switch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Kaspersky or ESET ESS ?I've been an Eset user for a long time ,but i'm not a fan of their new gui :(Yet another program forcing the fugly metro crap on us.Is Kaspersky as good as ESET ?Eset has done a good job protecting my computer ,but if Kaspersky has better gui i might switch.GUI isn't something that protects your computer but it's the engine that does it. Moreover, Kaspersky is a very good antivirus in the market currently. It's a good option to switch to if your current antivirus fails to protect you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
212eta Posted July 10, 2015 Share Posted July 10, 2015 Kaspersky or ESET?Is Kaspersky as good as ESET?As good as?By far, BETTER when it comes to Protection.When it comes to System Impact, ESET is lighter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.