A.lemane Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 The people who "need it" might also grow "just a little suspicious," after seeing the ominous Kaspersky report on your patch. :tehe:maybe still that s up to them i just wanted to help ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted October 9, 2015 Author Share Posted October 9, 2015 The people who "need it" might also grow "just a little suspicious," after seeing the ominous Kaspersky report on your patch. :tehe:maybe still that s up to them i just wanted to help ^^If you really want to help, you might want to make that firewall rule transparent so that it can be tested — by others (using a patch to mask a firewall rule instead, is not an encouraging step.) ;)Of course, it is your wish — I only wanted your idea to succeed (have seen many folks meet with failure.) :dunno: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted October 9, 2015 Author Share Posted October 9, 2015 @dcs18 :hi:just saw the abp topic once moreshudn't this rule be enuffhttp://www.nsaneforums.com/uploads/profile/photo-*.bmp?* isn't this rule already embodied in the first one and likewise other rules?http://www.nsaneforums.com/uploads/profile/photo-thumb-*.bmp?*Yes, while it is true that there does exist an overlap . . . . . . the reason behind keeping rules separated and independent is the learning objective — besides, wanted folks to be able to have a granular choice between blocking profile photos / avatars on one hand and/or only their thumbnails on the other. B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.lemane Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 The people who "need it" might also grow "just a little suspicious," after seeing the ominous Kaspersky report on your patch. :tehe:maybe still that s up to them i just wanted to help ^^If you really want to help, you might want to make that firewall rule transparent so that it can be tested — by others (using a patch to mask a firewall rule instead, is not an encouraging step.) ;)Of course, it is your wish — I only wanted your idea to succeed (have seen many folks meet with failure.) :dunno:just open the exe with 7zip and u can see the whole thing ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted October 9, 2015 Author Share Posted October 9, 2015 The people who "need it" might also grow "just a little suspicious," after seeing the ominous Kaspersky report on your patch. :tehe:maybe still that s up to them i just wanted to help ^^If you really want to help, you might want to make that firewall rule transparent so that it can be tested — by others (using a patch to mask a firewall rule instead, is not an encouraging step.) ;)Of course, it is your wish — I only wanted your idea to succeed (have seen many folks meet with failure.) :dunno:just open the exe with 7zip and u can see the whole thing ^^ Alright, I see that you have used all the 25 IPs — that means your patch looks set for success . . . . . nice:—netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="Rule Name: Internet Download Manager (IDM) (IDMan.exe)" dir=out action=block program="%ProgramFiles(x86)%\Internet Download Manager\IDMan.exe" enable=yes remoteip=50.22.78.28,50.22.78.29,50.22.78.31,50.97.41.98,50.97.82.44,69.41.163.49,69.41.163.149,75.125.34.148,75.125.34.157,169.55.0.224,169.55.40.5,173.255.134.84,173.255.137.80,174.127.73.80,174.127.73.85,174.133.70.98,174.133.70.101,184.173.149.184,184.173.188.104,184.173.188.106,184.173.188.107,202.134.64.74,207.44.199.16,207.44.199.159,207.44.199.165 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Instead of .exe, if possible, I would suggest to use .bat or .reg file for the "IDM one click fix" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.lemane Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Instead of .exe, if possible, I would suggest to use .bat or .reg file for the "IDM one click fix"there u go "IDM one click fix"http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/LLZPB061/(IDM)_(IDMan.exe)__Outbound_Application_Rule_.7z_links Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusktilldawn Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 "Preventing Windows 10 From Getting Reserved Without Your Consent"(monitor post # 2 for all updates) Method # 1:—Uninstall KB3035583 and then hide it on Windows Update — the process would have to be repeated after every Windows Update.Method # 2:—Disable launchtrayprocess, refreshgwxconfig, refreshgwxconfigandcontent and refreshgwxcontent under Task Scheduler.Method # 3:—Block GWX.exe, GWXConfigManager.exe, GWXDetector.exe, GWXUX.exe and GWXUXWorker.exe using your Anti-executable.Method # 4:—Block GWX.exe, GWXConfigManager.exe, GWXDetector.exe, GWXUX.exe and GWXUXWorker.exe using your Firewall.Method # 5:—Use all the above 4 methods.hi dcs,I think ,1st method exploded,although I didn't install "KB3035583" beginning of the installation win 7, this morning I saw the magic icon again.. :-)actually I have to say that I haven't seen that icon for a while and the method was working.I guess something must has changed..regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusktilldawn Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 "Preventing Windows 10 From Getting Reserved Without Your Consent"(monitor post # 2 for all updates) Method # 1:—Uninstall KB3035583 and then hide it on Windows Update — the process would have to be repeated after every Windows Update.Method # 2:—Disable launchtrayprocess, refreshgwxconfig, refreshgwxconfigandcontent and refreshgwxcontent under Task Scheduler.Method # 3:—Block GWX.exe, GWXConfigManager.exe, GWXDetector.exe, GWXUX.exe and GWXUXWorker.exe using your Anti-executable.Method # 4:—Block GWX.exe, GWXConfigManager.exe, GWXDetector.exe, GWXUX.exe and GWXUXWorker.exe using your Firewall.Method # 5:—Use all the above 4 methods.hi dcs,I think ,1st method exploded,although I didn't install "KB3035583" beginning of the installation win 7, this morning I saw the magic icon again.. :-)actually I have to say that I haven't seen that icon for a while and the method was working.I guess something must has changed..regardsI noticed,I had hide the ""KB3035583"" which was a hidden update section,butit must has been installed itself somehow..strange.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 hi dcs,I think ,1st method exploded,although I didn't install "KB3035583" beginning of the installation win 7, this morning I saw the magic icon again.. :-)actually I have to say that I haven't seen that icon for a while and the method was working.I guess something must has changed..regardsI noticed,I had hide the ""KB3035583"" which was a hidden update section,butit must has been installed itself somehow..strange..For Method # 1 to succeed, it has to be repeated at every Windows Update (as mentioned.)It is advisable to use Method # 5 (meaning all 4 methods, in conjunction) — works great for me on both my systems (Windows 7 and the 8.1 Update 3.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusktilldawn Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 hi dcs,I think ,1st method exploded,although I didn't install "KB3035583" beginning of the installation win 7, this morning I saw the magic icon again.. :-)actually I have to say that I haven't seen that icon for a while and the method was working.I guess something must has changed..regardsI noticed,I had hide the ""KB3035583"" which was a hidden update section,butit must has been installed itself somehow..strange..For Method # 1 to succeed, it has to be repeated at every Windows Update (as mentioned.)It is advisable to use Method # 5 (meaning all 4 methods, in conjunction) — works great for me on both my systems (Windows 7 and the 8.1 Update 3.)you r rightI will keep your wordthank you for respond.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 Post # 2 updated with a link at post # 1 (Tip # 10) to the .bat file created by A.lemane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusktilldawn Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Instead of .exe, if possible, I would suggest to use .bat or .reg file for the "IDM one click fix"there u go "IDM one click fix"http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/LLZPB061/(IDM)_(IDMan.exe)__Outbound_Application_Rule_.7z_linkshellowhich firewall set is this bat file? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusktilldawn Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Instead of .exe, if possible, I would suggest to use .bat or .reg file for the "IDM one click fix"there u go "IDM one click fix"http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/LLZPB061/(IDM)_(IDMan.exe)__Outbound_Application_Rule_.7z_linkshellowhich firewall set is this bat file?ok I see, for "Windows Firewall" settings.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 <snip><snip>Can you guys post a screenshot of your Virtual Memory window — I might have an idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 <snip> <snip>Can you guys post a screenshot of your Virtual Memory window I might have an idea. What is that anyway? ?Are you referring to pagefile.sys?How to get its screenshot BTW? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 Right-click Computer (My PC) >> Properties >> Advanced system settings >> Advanced >> Performance >> Settings... >> Advanced >> Change >> Virtual Memory (take the screenshot of this window.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 I have an android phone memory shortage query too. My bro's phone is left out with only 80 MB of free phone memory. The phone comes with 8GB of internal storage of which 4.9 GB is usable. I have manually calculated the total size of the files in the explorer which sums up to 1.67 GB. So how come the phone only show 80MB available? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 Stop asking foolish questions and get your screenshot, here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . now! :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 I have an android phone memory shortage query too. My bro's phone is left out with only 80 MB of free phone memory. The phone comes with 8GB of internal storage of which 4.9 GB is usable. I have manually calculated the total size of the files in the explorer which sums up to 1.67 GB. So how come the phone only show 80MB available? ?Which of the following status, best fits that device:-full-blooded rootrooted casuallynot rooted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Full blooded - through the xda developer's link that you had redirected me to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 I have manually calculated the total size of the files in the explorer which sums up to 1.67 GB.Did you use the native File Explorer or X-plore File Manager? :think: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 I have manually calculated the total size of the files in the explorer which sums up to 1.67 GB.Did you use the native File Explorer or X-plore File Manager? :think:Native one. I will see what I get with x-plore and report back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 From x-plore I can see a lot of files in the internal memory which are impossible to calculate manually. What to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.