Jump to content

"Compilation Of Tutorials, Guides, Tips & Updates"


dcs18

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.3k
  • Views 1.1m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The people who "need it" might also grow "just a little suspicious," after seeing the ominous Kaspersky report on your patch. :tehe:

maybe still that s up to them i just wanted to help ^^

If you really want to help, you might want to make that firewall rule transparent so that it can be tested — by others (using a patch to mask a firewall rule instead, is not an encouraging step.) ;)

Of course, it is your wish — I only wanted your idea to succeed (have seen many folks meet with failure.) :dunno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@dcs18 :hi:

just saw the abp topic once more

shudn't this rule be enuff

http://www.nsaneforums.com/uploads/profile/photo-*.bmp?*

isn't this rule already embodied in the first one and likewise other rules?

http://www.nsaneforums.com/uploads/profile/photo-thumb-*.bmp?*

Yes, while it is true that there does exist an overlap . . . . . . the reason behind keeping rules separated and independent is the learning objective — besides, wanted folks to be able to have a granular choice between blocking profile photos / avatars on one hand and/or only their thumbnails on the other. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The people who "need it" might also grow "just a little suspicious," after seeing the ominous Kaspersky report on your patch. :tehe:

maybe still that s up to them i just wanted to help ^^

If you really want to help, you might want to make that firewall rule transparent so that it can be tested — by others (using a patch to mask a firewall rule instead, is not an encouraging step.) ;)

Of course, it is your wish — I only wanted your idea to succeed (have seen many folks meet with failure.) :dunno:

just open the exe with 7zip and u can see the whole thing ^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The people who "need it" might also grow "just a little suspicious," after seeing the ominous Kaspersky report on your patch. :tehe:

maybe still that s up to them i just wanted to help ^^
If you really want to help, you might want to make that firewall rule transparent so that it can be tested — by others (using a patch to mask a firewall rule instead, is not an encouraging step.) ;)

Of course, it is your wish — I only wanted your idea to succeed (have seen many folks meet with failure.) :dunno:

just open the exe with 7zip and u can see the whole thing ^^

F3h9xqz.gif Alright, I see that you have used all the 25 IPs — that means your patch looks set for success . . . . . nice:—

netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="Rule Name: Internet Download Manager (IDM) (IDMan.exe)" dir=out action=block program="%ProgramFiles(x86)%\Internet Download Manager\IDMan.exe" enable=yes remoteip=50.22.78.28,50.22.78.29,50.22.78.31,50.97.41.98,50.97.82.44,69.41.163.49,69.41.163.149,75.125.34.148,75.125.34.157,169.55.0.224,169.55.40.5,173.255.134.84,173.255.137.80,174.127.73.80,174.127.73.85,174.133.70.98,174.133.70.101,184.173.149.184,184.173.188.104,184.173.188.106,184.173.188.107,202.134.64.74,207.44.199.16,207.44.199.159,207.44.199.165
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Instead of .exe, if possible, I would suggest to use .bat or .reg file for the "IDM one click fix"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


"Preventing Windows 10 From Getting Reserved Without Your Consent"

(monitor post # 2 for all updates)

Method # 1:—

  • Uninstall KB3035583 and then hide it on Windows Update — the process would have to be repeated after every Windows Update.

Method # 2:—

  • Disable launchtrayprocess, refreshgwxconfig, refreshgwxconfigandcontent and refreshgwxcontent under Task Scheduler.

Method # 3:—

  • Block GWX.exe, GWXConfigManager.exe, GWXDetector.exe, GWXUX.exe and GWXUXWorker.exe using your Anti-executable.

Method # 4:—

  • Block GWX.exe, GWXConfigManager.exe, GWXDetector.exe, GWXUX.exe and GWXUXWorker.exe using your Firewall.

Method # 5:—

  • Use all the above 4 methods.

hi dcs,

I think ,1st method exploded,

although I didn't install "KB3035583" beginning of the installation win 7, this morning I saw the magic icon again.. :-)

actually I have to say that I haven't seen that icon for a while and the method was working.

I guess something must has changed..

regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites


"Preventing Windows 10 From Getting Reserved Without Your Consent"

(monitor post # 2 for all updates)

Method # 1:—

  • Uninstall KB3035583 and then hide it on Windows Update — the process would have to be repeated after every Windows Update.

Method # 2:—

  • Disable launchtrayprocess, refreshgwxconfig, refreshgwxconfigandcontent and refreshgwxcontent under Task Scheduler.

Method # 3:—

  • Block GWX.exe, GWXConfigManager.exe, GWXDetector.exe, GWXUX.exe and GWXUXWorker.exe using your Anti-executable.

Method # 4:—

  • Block GWX.exe, GWXConfigManager.exe, GWXDetector.exe, GWXUX.exe and GWXUXWorker.exe using your Firewall.

Method # 5:—

  • Use all the above 4 methods.

hi dcs,

I think ,1st method exploded,

although I didn't install "KB3035583" beginning of the installation win 7, this morning I saw the magic icon again.. :-)

actually I have to say that I haven't seen that icon for a while and the method was working.

I guess something must has changed..

regards

I noticed,

I had hide the ""KB3035583"" which was a hidden update section,

but

it must has been installed itself somehow..strange..

Link to comment
Share on other sites


hi dcs,

I think ,1st method exploded,

although I didn't install "KB3035583" beginning of the installation win 7, this morning I saw the magic icon again.. :-)

actually I have to say that I haven't seen that icon for a while and the method was working.

I guess something must has changed..

regards

I noticed,

I had hide the ""KB3035583"" which was a hidden update section,

but

it must has been installed itself somehow..strange..

For Method # 1 to succeed, it has to be repeated at every Windows Update (as mentioned.)

It is advisable to use Method # 5 (meaning all 4 methods, in conjunction) — works great for me on both my systems (Windows 7 and the 8.1 Update 3.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


hi dcs,

I think ,1st method exploded,

although I didn't install "KB3035583" beginning of the installation win 7, this morning I saw the magic icon again.. :-)

actually I have to say that I haven't seen that icon for a while and the method was working.

I guess something must has changed..

regards

I noticed,

I had hide the ""KB3035583"" which was a hidden update section,

but

it must has been installed itself somehow..strange..

For Method # 1 to succeed, it has to be repeated at every Windows Update (as mentioned.)

It is advisable to use Method # 5 (meaning all 4 methods, in conjunction) — works great for me on both my systems (Windows 7 and the 8.1 Update 3.)

you r right

I will keep your word

thank you for respond..

Link to comment
Share on other sites


<snip>

<snip>

Can you guys post a screenshot of your Virtual Memory window I might have an idea. zDLbIxl.gif
What is that anyway? ?

Are you referring to pagefile.sys?

How to get its screenshot BTW? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Right-click Computer (My PC) >> Properties >> Advanced system settings >> Advanced >> Performance >> Settings... >> Advanced >> Change >> Virtual Memory (take the screenshot of this window.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have an android phone memory shortage query too. My bro's phone is left out with only 80 MB of free phone memory. The phone comes with 8GB of internal storage of which 4.9 GB is usable. I have manually calculated the total size of the files in the explorer which sums up to 1.67 GB. So how come the phone only show 80MB available? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have an android phone memory shortage query too. My bro's phone is left out with only 80 MB of free phone memory. The phone comes with 8GB of internal storage of which 4.9 GB is usable. I have manually calculated the total size of the files in the explorer which sums up to 1.67 GB. So how come the phone only show 80MB available? ?

Which of the following status, best fits that device:-

  • full-blooded root
  • rooted casually
  • not rooted
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Full blooded - through the xda developer's link that you had redirected me to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have manually calculated the total size of the files in the explorer which sums up to 1.67 GB.

Did you use the native File Explorer or X-plore File Manager? :think:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have manually calculated the total size of the files in the explorer which sums up to 1.67 GB.

Did you use the native File Explorer or X-plore File Manager? :think:
Native one. I will see what I get with x-plore and report back.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


From x-plore I can see a lot of files in the internal memory which are impossible to calculate manually. What to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Matrix locked this topic
  • Reefa unlocked this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...