Undertaker Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 4 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said: All mentioned on op : 108.161.189.32/32,169.55.0.224/32,169.55.0.225/32,169.55.0.227/32,169.55.40.5/32,173.255.134.84/32,173.255.137.80/32,174.127.73.80/32,174.127.73.85/32,174.133.70.101/32,174.133.70.98/32,184.173.149.184/32,184.173.188.104/32,184.173.188.106/32,184.173.188.107/32,185.80.220.22/32,185.80.221.18/32,185.80.221.19/32,202.134.64.74/32,202.134.93.17/32,207.44.199.159/32,207.44.199.16/32,207.44.199.165/32,50.22.103.114/32,50.22.78.28/32,50.22.78.29/32,50.22.78.31/32,50.97.41.98/32,50.97.82.44/32,69.41.163.149/32,69.41.163.49/32,75.125.34.148/32,75.125.34.157/32 In kaspersky, are you blocking it at network(system level) or application(IDM level)? Also, simple IP blocking in WInFW doesn't work anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 23, 2017 Author Share Posted June 23, 2017 10 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said: I had been using IP Block (both normal + CIDR method) <snip> Just now, IamBidyuT said: All mentioned on op : 108.161.189.32/32,169.55.0.224/32,169.55.0.225/32,169.55.0.227/32,169.55.40.5/32,173.255.134.84/32,173.255.137.80/32,174.127.73.80/32,174.127.73.85/32,174.133.70.101/32,174.133.70.98/32,184.173.149.184/32,184.173.188.104/32,184.173.188.106/32,184.173.188.107/32,185.80.220.22/32,185.80.221.18/32,185.80.221.19/32,202.134.64.74/32,202.134.93.17/32,207.44.199.159/32,207.44.199.16/32,207.44.199.165/32,50.22.103.114/32,50.22.78.28/32,50.22.78.29/32,50.22.78.31/32,50.97.41.98/32,50.97.82.44/32,69.41.163.149/32,69.41.163.49/32,75.125.34.148/32,75.125.34.157/32 You would be shocked if you knew the number of non-IDM IPs the CIDR method blocks — it's anyways impotent, ATM. If Kaspersky possesses domain-blocking, just use the following 10 domains (with the 33 IPs listed on the OP) — it will start working even with a blacklisted key and/or contaminated registry:— cmul.net dyxnet.com iivx.com internetdownloadmanager.com netdna-ssl.com registeridm.com sl-reverse.com softlayer.com theplanet.com tonec.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamBidyuT Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 1 minute ago, Undertaker said: In kaspersky, are you blocking it at network(system level) or application(IDM level)? Also, simple IP blocking in WInFW doesn't work anymore. System Level . . 1 minute ago, dcs18 said: You would be shocked if you knew the number of non-IDM IPs the CIDR method blocks — it's anyways impotent, ATM. If Kaspersky possesses domain-blocking, just use the following 10 domains (with the 33 IPs listed on the OP) — it will start working even with a blacklisted key and/or contaminated registry:— cmul.net dyxnet.com iivx.com internetdownloadmanager.com netdna-ssl.com registeridm.com sl-reverse.com softlayer.com theplanet.com tonec.com Let me check if it works . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 5 minutes ago, dcs18 said: You would be shocked if you knew the number of non-IDM IPs the CIDR method blocks — it's anyways impotent, ATM. The way he is using it, it's only 1 IP just that it's in CIDR form, but yeah even CIDR doesn't work in Win FW for IDM. 2 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said: Let me check if it works . . Also try with the batch file at point#3 in following post:- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 23, 2017 Author Share Posted June 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamBidyuT Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Well, kaspersky doesn't accept domains like " netdna-ssl.com " , " sl-reverse.com " which has "-" in them . . . Rest all blocked . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 23, 2017 Author Share Posted June 23, 2017 Is Kaspersky now retaining your IDM activation (without any nag):— after you use the Check for updates... via the IDM interface, and after you finish downloading any file? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamBidyuT Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Still , don't know what the heck's happening , , , will re-try later . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 6 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said: Still , don't know what the heck's happening , , , will re-try later . . If you could mention completely the build,version,patch of your kaspersky, maybe someone can help or test it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.lemane Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 1 minute ago, Undertaker said: If you could mention completely the build,version,patch of your kaspersky, maybe someone can help or test it? i suggest u guys should use Team viewer for a better communication & results or he can simply use another method if he couldn't accomplish this one ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 23, 2017 Author Share Posted June 23, 2017 11 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said: Still , don't know what the heck's happening , , , will re-try later . . If domain-blocking is not working, on Kaspersky — I'd use it to block just the 33 IPs and block the 10 domains with DNSCrypt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Just now, A.lemane said: i suggest u guys should use Team viewer for a better communication & results I haven't used TeamViewer in quite a while. I t was only recently that I had a session with @dcs18. I even forgot some of the basics 1 minute ago, A.lemane said: or he can simply use another method if he couldn't accomplish this one ^^ Always Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamBidyuT Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 14 minutes ago, Undertaker said: If you could mention completely the build,version,patch of your kaspersky, maybe someone can help or test it? Here it is : Well, you can have a teamviewer session , may be you can solve where i'm being failed . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 23, 2017 Author Share Posted June 23, 2017 Good News:— Windows Firewall Control (WFC) has just been updated. Bad News:— It still lacks domain-blocking capabilities and needs DNSCrypt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 49 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said: Well, you can have a teamviewer session , may be you can solve where i'm being failed . Done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamBidyuT Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Just now, Undertaker said: Done rekatrednU sknahT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Just now, IamBidyuT said: rekatrednU sknahT Point to be noted, I don't know what was wrong with his config, as I didn't tinker much with them. Maybe the name(Deadman) is enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 23, 2017 Author Share Posted June 23, 2017 Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Just now, dcs18 said: Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? Dunno, didn't have to modify any of those settings, he had that already fixed. But those two domains were not there. I will check it myself and report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamBidyuT Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 4 minutes ago, dcs18 said: Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? It just gives warning like this: If i remove the " - " from the domain , then it gets accepted . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 23, 2017 Author Share Posted June 23, 2017 ATM, those 2 domains (netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com,) are not responsible for deactivation — however, all IDM domains as well need to be blocked just like all IDM IPs (Tonec can switch domains just as easily as they've been switching IPs.) It would be worth using IPSec to block netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com, as a precautionary measure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 23, 2017 Author Share Posted June 23, 2017 9 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said: 15 minutes ago, dcs18 said: Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? It just gives warning like this: If i remove the " - " from the domain , then it gets accepted . . Just another way of blocking domains with Kaspersky worth exploring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamBidyuT Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 I'll check for further modification 6 minutes ago, dcs18 said: Just another way of blocking domains with Kaspersky worth exploring. Anti-Banner just blocks banners from websites , it has nothing to do with full domain block . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamanokaito Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 You can add this domain netdna-ssl.com or can't Resolve to ip. Because, watch Under. Address lookup lookup failed netdna-ssl.com Could not find an IP address for this domain name. DNS records name class type data time to live netdna-ssl.com IN HINFO CPU: All your ANY are belong to us. OS: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any 3600s (01:00:00) netdna-ssl.com IN NS dns2.p07.nsone.net 3600s (01:00:00) netdna-ssl.com IN NS dns1.p07.nsone.net 3600s (01:00:00) netdna-ssl.com IN NS dns3.p07.nsone.net 3600s (01:00:00) netdna-ssl.com IN NS dns4.p07.nsone.net 3600s (01:00:00) netdna-ssl.com IN NS ns-235.awsdns-29.com 3600s (01:00:00) netdna-ssl.com IN NS ns-1647.awsdns-13.co.uk 3600s (01:00:00) netdna-ssl.com IN NS ns-1435.awsdns-51.org 3600s (01:00:00) netdna-ssl.com IN NS ns-844.awsdns-41.net 3600s (01:00:00) -- end -- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dukun Cabul Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 New IDM is out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.