Jump to content

"Compilation Of Tutorials, Guides, Tips & Updates"


dcs18

Recommended Posts

  On 6/23/2017 at 8:13 AM, IamBidyuT said:

 

All mentioned on op : 108.161.189.32/32,169.55.0.224/32,169.55.0.225/32,169.55.0.227/32,169.55.40.5/32,173.255.134.84/32,173.255.137.80/32,174.127.73.80/32,174.127.73.85/32,174.133.70.101/32,174.133.70.98/32,184.173.149.184/32,184.173.188.104/32,184.173.188.106/32,184.173.188.107/32,185.80.220.22/32,185.80.221.18/32,185.80.221.19/32,202.134.64.74/32,202.134.93.17/32,207.44.199.159/32,207.44.199.16/32,207.44.199.165/32,50.22.103.114/32,50.22.78.28/32,50.22.78.29/32,50.22.78.31/32,50.97.41.98/32,50.97.82.44/32,69.41.163.149/32,69.41.163.49/32,75.125.34.148/32,75.125.34.157/32

Expand  

In kaspersky, are you blocking it at network(system level) or application(IDM level)?

 

Also, simple IP blocking in WInFW doesn't work anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 7.3k
  • Views 1.2m
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 6/23/2017 at 8:03 AM, IamBidyuT said:

I had been using IP Block (both normal + CIDR method) <snip>

Expand  

 

  On 6/23/2017 at 8:13 AM, IamBidyuT said:

All mentioned on op : 108.161.189.32/32,169.55.0.224/32,169.55.0.225/32,169.55.0.227/32,169.55.40.5/32,173.255.134.84/32,173.255.137.80/32,174.127.73.80/32,174.127.73.85/32,174.133.70.101/32,174.133.70.98/32,184.173.149.184/32,184.173.188.104/32,184.173.188.106/32,184.173.188.107/32,185.80.220.22/32,185.80.221.18/32,185.80.221.19/32,202.134.64.74/32,202.134.93.17/32,207.44.199.159/32,207.44.199.16/32,207.44.199.165/32,50.22.103.114/32,50.22.78.28/32,50.22.78.29/32,50.22.78.31/32,50.97.41.98/32,50.97.82.44/32,69.41.163.149/32,69.41.163.49/32,75.125.34.148/32,75.125.34.157/32

Expand  

You would be shocked if you knew the number of non-IDM IPs the CIDR method blocks — it's anyways impotent, ATM.

 

If Kaspersky possesses domain-blocking, just use the following 10 domains (with the 33 IPs listed on the OP) — it will start working even with a blacklisted key and/or contaminated registry:—

 

cmul.net

dyxnet.com

iivx.com

internetdownloadmanager.com

netdna-ssl.com

registeridm.com

sl-reverse.com

softlayer.com

theplanet.com

tonec.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 8:19 AM, Undertaker said:

In kaspersky, are you blocking it at network(system level) or application(IDM level)?

 

Also, simple IP blocking in WInFW doesn't work anymore.

Expand  

 

System Level . . 

 

  On 6/23/2017 at 8:19 AM, dcs18 said:

 

You would be shocked if you knew the number of non-IDM IPs the CIDR method blocks — it's anyways impotent, ATM.

 

If Kaspersky possesses domain-blocking, just use the following 10 domains (with the 33 IPs listed on the OP) — it will start working even with a blacklisted key and/or contaminated registry:—

 

 

cmul.net

 

dyxnet.com

 

 

iivx.com

 

 

internetdownloadmanager.com

 

 

netdna-ssl.com

 

 

registeridm.com

 

 

sl-reverse.com

 

 

softlayer.com

 

 

theplanet.com

 

 

tonec.com

 

 

Expand  

 

Let me check if it works . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 8:19 AM, dcs18 said:

You would be shocked if you knew the number of non-IDM IPs the CIDR method blocks — it's anyways impotent, ATM.

Expand  

The way he is using it, it's only 1 IP just that it's in CIDR form, but yeah even CIDR doesn't work in Win FW for IDM.

 

  On 6/23/2017 at 8:22 AM, IamBidyuT said:

Let me check if it works . . 

Expand  

Also try with the batch file at point#3  in following post:-

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well, kaspersky doesn't accept domains like " netdna-ssl.com " , " sl-reverse.com " which has "-" in them -_- . . . Rest all blocked . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Is Kaspersky now retaining your IDM activation (without any nag):—

  • after you use the Check for updates... via the IDM interface, and
  • after you finish downloading any file?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Still <_< , don't know what the heck's happening  , , , will re-try later . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 11:14 AM, IamBidyuT said:

Still <_< , don't know what the heck's happening  , , , will re-try later . . 

Expand  

If you could mention completely the build,version,patch of your kaspersky, maybe someone can help or test it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 11:22 AM, Undertaker said:

If you could mention completely the build,version,patch of your kaspersky, maybe someone can help or test it?

Expand  

i suggest u guys should use Team viewer for a better communication & results 

 

or he can simply use another method    if    he couldn't accomplish this one ^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 11:14 AM, IamBidyuT said:

Still <_< , don't know what the heck's happening  , , , will re-try later . . 

Expand  

If domain-blocking is not working, on Kaspersky — I'd use it to block just the 33 IPs and block the 10 domains with DNSCrypt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 11:25 AM, A.lemane said:

i suggest u guys should use Team viewer for a better communication & results

Expand  

I haven't used TeamViewer in quite a while. I t was only recently that I had a session with @dcs18. I even forgot some of the basics :P

 

  On 6/23/2017 at 11:25 AM, A.lemane said:

or he can simply use another method    if    he couldn't accomplish this one ^^

Expand  

Always :cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 11:22 AM, Undertaker said:

If you could mention completely the build,version,patch of your kaspersky, maybe someone can help or test it?

Expand  

Here it is :G.png

 

Well,  you can have a teamviewer session , may be you can solve where i'm being failed . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Good News:—

 

Windows Firewall Control (WFC) has just been updated.

 

 

Bad News:—

 

It still lacks domain-blocking capabilities and needs DNSCrypt. :P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 11:37 AM, IamBidyuT said:

Well,  you can have a teamviewer session , may be you can solve where i'm being failed . 

Expand  

Done ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 12:31 PM, IamBidyuT said:

 

:clap: rekatrednU sknahT

Expand  

Point to be noted, I don't know what was wrong with his config, as I didn't tinker much with them. Maybe the name(Deadman) is enough :hehe::tooth:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? yXZVmpE.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 12:40 PM, dcs18 said:

Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? yXZVmpE.gif

Expand  

Dunno, didn't have to modify any of those settings, he had that already fixed. But those two domains were not there. I will check it myself and report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 12:40 PM, dcs18 said:

Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? yXZVmpE.gif

Expand  

It just gives warning like this:   F.png

 

If i remove the " - " from the domain , then it gets accepted . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


ATM, those 2 domains (netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com,) are not responsible for deactivation — however, all IDM domains as well need to be blocked just like all IDM IPs (Tonec can switch domains just as easily as they've been switching IPs.)

 

It would be worth using IPSec to block netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com, as a precautionary measure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  On 6/23/2017 at 12:46 PM, IamBidyuT said:
  On 6/23/2017 at 12:40 PM, dcs18 said:

Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? yXZVmpE.gif

Expand  

It just gives warning like this:   F.png

 

If i remove the " - " from the domain , then it gets accepted . . 

Expand  

Just another way of blocking domains with Kaspersky worth exploring. ;)

 

ka3GLbe.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'll check for further modification 

  On 6/23/2017 at 12:56 PM, dcs18 said:

Just another way of blocking domains with Kaspersky worth exploring. ;)

Expand  

 

Anti-Banner just blocks banners from websites , it has nothing to do with full domain block . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


hamanokaito

You can add this domain netdna-ssl.com or can't Resolve to ip.

Because, watch Under.

 

Address lookup
lookup failed 	netdna-ssl.com
  	Could not find an IP address for this domain name.
DNS records
name	class	type	data	time to live
netdna-ssl.com	IN	HINFO	
CPU:	All your ANY are belong to us.
OS:	draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any
	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	dns2.p07.nsone.net	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	dns1.p07.nsone.net	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	dns3.p07.nsone.net	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	dns4.p07.nsone.net	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	ns-235.awsdns-29.com	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	ns-1647.awsdns-13.co.uk	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	ns-1435.awsdns-51.org	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	ns-844.awsdns-41.net	3600s	(01:00:00)

-- end --

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...