Jump to content

"Compilation Of Tutorials, Guides, Tips & Updates"


dcs18

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said:

 

All mentioned on op : 108.161.189.32/32,169.55.0.224/32,169.55.0.225/32,169.55.0.227/32,169.55.40.5/32,173.255.134.84/32,173.255.137.80/32,174.127.73.80/32,174.127.73.85/32,174.133.70.101/32,174.133.70.98/32,184.173.149.184/32,184.173.188.104/32,184.173.188.106/32,184.173.188.107/32,185.80.220.22/32,185.80.221.18/32,185.80.221.19/32,202.134.64.74/32,202.134.93.17/32,207.44.199.159/32,207.44.199.16/32,207.44.199.165/32,50.22.103.114/32,50.22.78.28/32,50.22.78.29/32,50.22.78.31/32,50.97.41.98/32,50.97.82.44/32,69.41.163.149/32,69.41.163.49/32,75.125.34.148/32,75.125.34.157/32

In kaspersky, are you blocking it at network(system level) or application(IDM level)?

 

Also, simple IP blocking in WInFW doesn't work anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 7.3k
  • Views 1.1m
  • Created
  • Last Reply
10 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said:

I had been using IP Block (both normal + CIDR method) <snip>

 

Just now, IamBidyuT said:

All mentioned on op : 108.161.189.32/32,169.55.0.224/32,169.55.0.225/32,169.55.0.227/32,169.55.40.5/32,173.255.134.84/32,173.255.137.80/32,174.127.73.80/32,174.127.73.85/32,174.133.70.101/32,174.133.70.98/32,184.173.149.184/32,184.173.188.104/32,184.173.188.106/32,184.173.188.107/32,185.80.220.22/32,185.80.221.18/32,185.80.221.19/32,202.134.64.74/32,202.134.93.17/32,207.44.199.159/32,207.44.199.16/32,207.44.199.165/32,50.22.103.114/32,50.22.78.28/32,50.22.78.29/32,50.22.78.31/32,50.97.41.98/32,50.97.82.44/32,69.41.163.149/32,69.41.163.49/32,75.125.34.148/32,75.125.34.157/32

You would be shocked if you knew the number of non-IDM IPs the CIDR method blocks — it's anyways impotent, ATM.

 

If Kaspersky possesses domain-blocking, just use the following 10 domains (with the 33 IPs listed on the OP) — it will start working even with a blacklisted key and/or contaminated registry:—

 

cmul.net

dyxnet.com

iivx.com

internetdownloadmanager.com

netdna-ssl.com

registeridm.com

sl-reverse.com

softlayer.com

theplanet.com

tonec.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 minute ago, Undertaker said:

In kaspersky, are you blocking it at network(system level) or application(IDM level)?

 

Also, simple IP blocking in WInFW doesn't work anymore.

 

System Level . . 

 

1 minute ago, dcs18 said:

 

You would be shocked if you knew the number of non-IDM IPs the CIDR method blocks — it's anyways impotent, ATM.

 

If Kaspersky possesses domain-blocking, just use the following 10 domains (with the 33 IPs listed on the OP) — it will start working even with a blacklisted key and/or contaminated registry:—

 

 

cmul.net

 

dyxnet.com

 

 

iivx.com

 

 

internetdownloadmanager.com

 

 

netdna-ssl.com

 

 

registeridm.com

 

 

sl-reverse.com

 

 

softlayer.com

 

 

theplanet.com

 

 

tonec.com

 

 

 

Let me check if it works . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


5 minutes ago, dcs18 said:

You would be shocked if you knew the number of non-IDM IPs the CIDR method blocks — it's anyways impotent, ATM.

The way he is using it, it's only 1 IP just that it's in CIDR form, but yeah even CIDR doesn't work in Win FW for IDM.

 

2 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said:

Let me check if it works . . 

Also try with the batch file at point#3  in following post:-

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well, kaspersky doesn't accept domains like " netdna-ssl.com " , " sl-reverse.com " which has "-" in them -_- . . . Rest all blocked . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Is Kaspersky now retaining your IDM activation (without any nag):—

  • after you use the Check for updates... via the IDM interface, and
  • after you finish downloading any file?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Still <_< , don't know what the heck's happening  , , , will re-try later . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


6 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said:

Still <_< , don't know what the heck's happening  , , , will re-try later . . 

If you could mention completely the build,version,patch of your kaspersky, maybe someone can help or test it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 minute ago, Undertaker said:

If you could mention completely the build,version,patch of your kaspersky, maybe someone can help or test it?

i suggest u guys should use Team viewer for a better communication & results 

 

or he can simply use another method    if    he couldn't accomplish this one ^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites


11 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said:

Still <_< , don't know what the heck's happening  , , , will re-try later . . 

If domain-blocking is not working, on Kaspersky — I'd use it to block just the 33 IPs and block the 10 domains with DNSCrypt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just now, A.lemane said:

i suggest u guys should use Team viewer for a better communication & results

I haven't used TeamViewer in quite a while. I t was only recently that I had a session with @dcs18. I even forgot some of the basics :P

 

1 minute ago, A.lemane said:

or he can simply use another method    if    he couldn't accomplish this one ^^

Always :cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


14 minutes ago, Undertaker said:

If you could mention completely the build,version,patch of your kaspersky, maybe someone can help or test it?

Here it is :G.png

 

Well,  you can have a teamviewer session , may be you can solve where i'm being failed . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Good News:—

 

Windows Firewall Control (WFC) has just been updated.

 

 

Bad News:—

 

It still lacks domain-blocking capabilities and needs DNSCrypt. :P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


49 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said:

Well,  you can have a teamviewer session , may be you can solve where i'm being failed . 

Done ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just now, IamBidyuT said:

 

:clap: rekatrednU sknahT

Point to be noted, I don't know what was wrong with his config, as I didn't tinker much with them. Maybe the name(Deadman) is enough :hehe::tooth:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? yXZVmpE.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just now, dcs18 said:

Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? yXZVmpE.gif

Dunno, didn't have to modify any of those settings, he had that already fixed. But those two domains were not there. I will check it myself and report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


4 minutes ago, dcs18 said:

Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? yXZVmpE.gif

It just gives warning like this:   F.png

 

If i remove the " - " from the domain , then it gets accepted . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


ATM, those 2 domains (netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com,) are not responsible for deactivation — however, all IDM domains as well need to be blocked just like all IDM IPs (Tonec can switch domains just as easily as they've been switching IPs.)

 

It would be worth using IPSec to block netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com, as a precautionary measure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


9 minutes ago, IamBidyuT said:
15 minutes ago, dcs18 said:

Does Kaspersky have full domain-blocking capabilities (inclusive of netdna-ssl.com and sl-reverse.com) like COMODO or does it need any additional hand-holding from other programs like DNSCrypt, Adguard, cFosSpeed, etc., etc? yXZVmpE.gif

It just gives warning like this:   F.png

 

If i remove the " - " from the domain , then it gets accepted . . 

Just another way of blocking domains with Kaspersky worth exploring. ;)

 

ka3GLbe.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'll check for further modification 

6 minutes ago, dcs18 said:

Just another way of blocking domains with Kaspersky worth exploring. ;)

 

Anti-Banner just blocks banners from websites , it has nothing to do with full domain block . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


hamanokaito

You can add this domain netdna-ssl.com or can't Resolve to ip.

Because, watch Under.

 

Address lookup
lookup failed 	netdna-ssl.com
  	Could not find an IP address for this domain name.
DNS records
name	class	type	data	time to live
netdna-ssl.com	IN	HINFO	
CPU:	All your ANY are belong to us.
OS:	draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any
	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	dns2.p07.nsone.net	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	dns1.p07.nsone.net	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	dns3.p07.nsone.net	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	dns4.p07.nsone.net	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	ns-235.awsdns-29.com	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	ns-1647.awsdns-13.co.uk	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	ns-1435.awsdns-51.org	3600s	(01:00:00)
netdna-ssl.com	IN	NS	ns-844.awsdns-41.net	3600s	(01:00:00)

-- end --

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Matrix locked this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...