Jump to content

ESET v4 Fixes


shought

Recommended Posts

Please, Please :

It doesn`t matter which fix I use with ESS 4.2.35 always receive a message saying :- "Error - Failed to read firewall configuration " . Sense Firewall is with default settings, how to solve this situation ?

WinXP Pro SP3 (32 bits)

= First to give the solution gets a prize ! =

Cheers

Jofre

Hello my friend, glad you solved this by yourself - the solution is here:-

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 2k
  • Views 216.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Hmm....MiNodlogin 3.8.0.1 is out.

----------------------------------------------------------------

:hi: kotaxor !

This version of MiNodLogin ( 3.8.0.1) --» According to the producers was done before ESET 4.2.35 was released , so doesn`t work .Is now in good conditions for previous version 4.0.474 , because new servers were inserted and stopped ESET of blocking servers too.

Till now only « box, mara.fix 1.3 » and « NodLogin 10c » are working with ESET v.4.2.35

NodEnabler ended ( No news from the author sense long time ago )

Minodlogin --» Expecting for a new version...

Cheers :pirate:

Jofre

Link to comment
Share on other sites


is it normal for eset smart security to say 31 days are remaining when I apply the fix? i'm using the latest version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

You mean box, mara- fix? Yes(if you haven't checked the trial watermark thingy in the fix I think, but doesn't matter). ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hmm....MiNodlogin 3.8.0.1 is out.

----------------------------------------------------------------

:hi: kotaxor !

This version of MiNodLogin ( 3.8.0.1) --» According to the producers was done before ESET 4.2.35 was released , so doesn`t work .

Till now only « box, mara.fix 1.3 » and « NodLogin 10c » are working.

NodEnabler ended.

Minodlogin --» Hope a new v. will be released one day...

Cheers :pirate:

Jofre

Seem so....it only inserted a user name but no passwords. Hmmm.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You mean box, mara- fix? Yes(if you haven't checked the trial watermark thingy in the fix I think, but doesn't matter). ;)

Yes, the box mara fix. I'm sure i didn't check the trial watermark thing. Thanks for the input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


is box, mara.fix 1.3 really still working on 4.2?

coz i just uninstalled ESS again(for the second time), after it asked me for a username & password while the patch is applied.

can someone confirm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hmm....MiNodlogin 3.8.0.1 is out.

----------------------------------------------------------------

:hi: kotaxor !

This version of MiNodLogin ( 3.8.0.1) --» According to the producers was done before ESET 4.2.35 was released , so doesn`t work .

Till now only « box, mara.fix 1.3 » and « NodLogin 10c » are working.

NodEnabler ended.

Minodlogin --» Hope a new v. will be released one day...

Cheers :pirate:

Jofre

hi jofre, updated to 4.235 a week ago and nodenabler still working ok as far as i can tell, what do you mean by ended?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@ugatme

Remove the existing username and password, then run NodEnabler and see whether it insert a new username and passwords.

Had not use NodEnabler for a long time, don't know if it still works, but accordingly to its forum, most are finding it not working for 4.2.35.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yeah, a no go. Even with sites listed in address management they got blocked.

It managed to copy a username but no password lol. :frusty:

Also NOD32.Online.KeyGen.BBs not working

Just checked, Eset Special Key Finder V.1 working

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well....you can use mara-box trial fix or nodlogin 10c with 4.2.35 OR like me using 4.0.474 with Minodlogin 3.8.0.1.

Until a new NodEnabler or Minodlogin comes along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@Tucker:

Other than the trial watermark issue, I believe there are a number of report saying that it's still working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hi All,

Hoping someone can help me out with an issue.

I am trying to upgrade ESS on XP SP3 x86.

FROM:

ESET Smart Security 3.0.657 + Box-Mara 1.1

TO:

ESET Smart Security 4.2.35.0 + Box-Mara 1.3

During the uninstall of 3.0.657, I got an error saying it couldn't delete these keys:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ESET

I 'ignored' it and proceeded with the uninstall. After it was complete, I tried to delete that key manually, and it did not work. I got this error:

---------------------------

Error Deleting Key

---------------------------

Cannot delete ESET: Error while deleting key.

---------------------------

OK

---------------------------

I went ahead with the install of 4.2.35.0 anyway, but it also errored with the same complaint about said reg key. I aborted the install.

I assume this has something to do with the permissions set on that key by box-mara1.1. I looked at the permission but couldn't figure it out. I (as the administrator) should have access to delete that key.

Any ideas??

:blink: :blink: :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hi All,

Hoping someone can help me out with an issue.

I am trying to upgrade ESS on XP SP3 x86.

FROM:

ESET Smart Security 3.0.657 + Box-Mara 1.1

TO:

ESET Smart Security 4.2.35.0 + Box-Mara 1.3

During the uninstall of 3.0.657, I got an error saying it couldn't delete these keys:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ESET

I 'ignored' it and proceeded with the uninstall. After it was complete, I tried to delete that key manually, and it did not work. I got this error:

---------------------------

Error Deleting Key

---------------------------

Cannot delete ESET: Error while deleting key.

---------------------------

OK

---------------------------

I went ahead with the install of 4.2.35.0 anyway, but it also errored with the same complaint about said reg key. I aborted the install.

I assume this has something to do with the permissions set on that key by box-mara1.1. I looked at the permission but couldn't figure it out. I (as the administrator) should have access to delete that key.

Any ideas??

:blink: :blink: :blink:

Nevermind my previous post. After double-checking the sub-keys, I found that the 'Info' key had permissions removed. So, no problem.

ESS 4.2.35.0 + box-mara1.3 is now up and running.

Everything seems to be working.

I am a little concerned about CPU and memory usage for this version, but I will give it more time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


MiNodLogin 3.8.0.1 :

Works 100% with previous ESET Nod32 AV and ESS 4.0.

Tested and no issues found. New servers were inserted and stopped ESET of blocking servers . Is fine now.

Download :

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Site ........................................................ Mediafire.com

ShareCode ...................................................................... /?anwnzmenoi2

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Cheers

Jofre

Link to comment
Share on other sites


MiNodLogin 3.8.0.1 :

Works 100% with previous ESET Nod32 AV and ESS 4.0.

Tested and no issues found. New servers were inserted and stopped ESET of blocking servers . Is fine now.

hey jofre, notice you didn't write eav v4.2, not tested for it? thanx

Link to comment
Share on other sites


MiNodLogin 3.8.0.1 :

Works 100% with previous ESET Nod32 AV and ESS 4.0.

Tested and no issues found. New servers were inserted and stopped ESET of blocking servers . Is fine now.

hey jofre, notice you didn't write eav v4.2, not tested for it? thanx

It does not insert password in v4.2

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've just installed NOD32 Anti-Virus 4.2.35.0 + box, mara-fix 1.3 which "appears" to be the most popular of the fixes listed here, having been using v2.70.39 with NOD32 fx 2.2 for the past couple of years. ohmy.gif

I think I've done everything correctly, but I can't find anywhere where it tells me how many "trial" days remaining, which should either be very high, or keep resetting with this fix?

Also, the "Verify License Validity" option is now greyed out, which I presume is correct?

Finally, how important is it to re-enable the "Self Defense" option given in the fix?

Thanks in advance. rolleyes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...