Sylence Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 Windows 10 Sends Huge Amount Of Data To Microsoft IP Addresses With the release of Windows 10 operating system, Microsoft has changed its policy and decided to offer free update all Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 users. There are various reasons for that, but one thing is sure - the company wants to have more control over user's data. According to Voat user CheesusCrust, who has done some extensive testing on Windows 10, the operating system sends a huge amount of data Microsoft IP addresses. During an 8-hour period, his PC tried to send data to over 51 different IPS addresses owned by Microsoft, and at a staggering 5,500 times, and after 30 hours, it reached a huge 113 non-private IP addresses. Another problem is the non-private IP addresses, which can be intercepted by hackers, making the OS very vulnerable. Even if you disable all the tracking features, and use some third-party tools such as DisableWinTracking, the PC will still send data to Microsoft. In that case, his PC pushed data to Microsoft 2,758 times, across 30 different IP addresses. Spoiler [–] BobBelcher 34 points (+35|-1) 9 days ago (edited 1 day ago) So, just to quickly summarize, that's 3967 connection attempts to 51 different Microsoft IPs. Obviously port 80 is standard web traffic for http, port 443 being for https. According to this, that first one with the most attempts on port 3544 is likely to be their Consumer Experience Program. So, telemetry data. OP, can you confirm if you opt'ed out of that program during the install? If you did, and it's still trying to connect that many times..... That IP also apparently traces back to the UK. EDIT - Archive link since OP nuked his posts: https://archive.is/QFL8e permalink parent [–] [deleted] 9 days ago (edited 9 days ago) [deleted by user] parent 3 replies [–] alexei954 6 points (+6|-0) 4 days ago That IP also apparently traces back to the UK. This is significant. By routing traffic to an overseas connection, traffic is automatically susceptible to warrant-less data collection. Additionally, once it is in Britain, it becomes susceptible to collection by the GCHQ (the British version of the NSA) and whatever rules the British may or may not follow for data collection. Once they have it, it can be shared back with the US, providing another legalistic end-run to deal with. permalink parent Load more replies (3 remaining) [–] [deleted] 10 days ago [deleted by author at 2/12/2016 1:11:37 AM] parent Load more replies (5 remaining) [–] crustyjuggler 40 points (+42|-2) 10 days ago I think the best thing to do after a few more days of collection is to gather the same information again after running spybot anti-beacon. I'm EXTREMELY curious to see what you find. You're right, no one seems to be talking about this. Everything I have found on the net is either "oh, this is what they are spying on" and "here are a few tools like spybot anti-beacon". Zero fucking reviews on whether they work or not, and it's bothering me. I've been meaning to run a windows 10VM and inspect the traffic coming from the virtual adapter, but I haven't had the time. Thanks in advance. BTW. Lol, we have similar usernames. Stay crusty! permalink [–] [deleted] 10 days ago [deleted by user] parent [–] crustyjuggler 15 points (+16|-1) 10 days ago (edited 9 days ago) Anti-beacon basically modifies the registry, local group policy, and disables a ton of the telemetry. I think it adds a bunch to the hosts file also. Though, I have heard that low level components of Windows 10 can get around the hosts file instead of blocking traffic. Barnacules Nerdgasm did a semi-review on it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1kGMCfb2xwYouTube Thanks for doing this! permalink parent 3 replies [–] simagule 4 points (+5|-1) 9 days ago Can you also do a install where you don't uncheck all the tracking options for a comparision permalink parent Load more replies (1 remaining) [–] ginx2666 -1 points (+1|-2) 8 days ago Zero fucking reviews on whether they work or not, and it's bothering me. Whether they do or not, the best way to completely cut off M$ is to block those addresses in external, hardware firewall. There. Nothing M$ can do about that. permalink parent [–] crustyjuggler 0 points (+1|-1) 8 days ago I have been recently tempted to build a pfsense router. Maybe now's the time to really consider it since I run wind10 on my gaming rig and laptop. permalink parent 1 reply [–] Troll 30 points (+31|-1) 10 days ago Thank you for posting this. These tables basically spell out FUCK YOU WE'RE MICROSOFT WE CAN DO WHATEVER WE WANT YOU FAGGOTS. permalink [–] european 4 points (+7|-3) 9 days ago Well yes. They did write it. EULA probably does not promise to not totally and utterly destroy your privavy. permalink parent [–] arrggg 21 points (+22|-1) 9 days ago Excellent writeup and documentation. I did the same test on Windows 10 Enterprise and was unable to stop the connections out, even after disabling most of the services. While you are at it, here are a few more things to try that will produce interesting\creepy results Block all the dns requests from local hosts file, and see how many retry with hard coded ips. Block all the IP's collected from the first 2 tests with null routes or on the router, and see how many alternates it tries. Disable the services that enable telemetry, ceip, onedrive, windows store, windows defender, windows update, and then document the new connections out. Can't wait to see your results. Documenting this unbelievable spyware is the first step to doing something about it. permalink [–] [deleted] 9 days ago [deleted by user] parent [–] chubbysumo 0 points (+0|-0) 2 days ago Block all the dns requests from local hosts file, and see how many retry with hard coded ips it has already been proven that you cannot block or disable MS IPs through the host file, the windows firewall, or the group policy editor. Its hard coded into windows 10 to allow those IPs 100% of the time. You need to add IPtable rules to block/drop them. permalink parent [–] [deleted] 10 days ago [deleted by user] [–] FuttsMcButts 6 points (+7|-1) 9 days ago Thanks for taking the time to do this for people that don't know how or don't have the time for! permalink parent [–] [deleted] 10 days ago (edited 10 days ago) [deleted by author at 2/12/2016 1:11:41 AM] [–] [deleted] 10 days ago [deleted by user] parent [–] LibNE 0 points (+0|-0) 2 days ago This would mean a lot to the world of security observationists. permalink parent [–] SuperConductiveRabbi 10 points (+11|-1) 9 days ago Are these limited to outbound connection attempts? Can you repeat this analysis for WIndows 7 and then for a flavor of Linux? What type of traffic is being transmitted to the top hosts? Is it encrypted? Do you have experience installing your own root CA on the target machine and creating a MITM SSL proxy to decrypt any SSL-protected information from the top hosts? permalink [–] onegin 8 points (+9|-1) 10 days ago Great to see some real data on this. So since you dropped all connections at the router, that means all these ips are hard coded into the OS? It'd be interesting to see what happens if you don't drop the connections. You never know when they might pull down more ips with one of their requests. It would also help filter out any "first boot" connections and give an idea of the ongoing telemetry activity. permalink [–] european 2 points (+4|-2) 9 days ago (edited 9 days ago) Can you explain this? So since you dropped all connections at the router, that means all these ips are hard coded into the OS? permalink parent [–] Aradiel 3 points (+4|-1) 9 days ago (edited 9 days ago) I think he means that since the traffic isn't going outside of the router, it can't be hitting a DNS server, so it has the IPs specified rather than the more human-readable names. permalink parent 1 reply [–] RedSocks157 8 points (+9|-1) 9 days ago Holy shit. What could possibly be the purpose of all those connection attempts? This is ridiculous! Could I configure my router to block connections in such a way that Win10 can't do this? I have it on my HTPC only, but I still don't want it sharing data with M$...there has to be a way. permalink [–] tomlinas 0 points (+0|-0) 9 days ago What could possibly be the purpose of all those connection attempts? Well, all of the ones with "deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com" in them are attempts to download windows updates, which Windows does from a huge block of IPs concurrently. I presume this is to spread load on MS' side but I'm not really sure -- I do know setting up squid to cache these is getting incrementally harder :/ The *.search.msn.com ones are very interesting to me. I have been able to get my box to generate queries to Bing with all of the privacy options turned off by searching in the start menu, but not the MSN ones. OP - do you have the MSN live tile installed? I haven't done a vanilla Enterprise install, so not sure if that's on the Enterprise image...I wouldn't think so but you never know I am mostly interested in what the static IPs that don't backwards resolve end up being... permalink parent [–] jagerhayles 7 points (+8|-1) 10 days ago Can I get a layman's summary? This is a lot of information to process and I can't really get the full picture with my limited tech knowledge, but I value knowing what my property is doing. permalink [–] [deleted] 10 days ago (edited 10 days ago) [deleted by user] parent [–] NedTaggart 14 points (+15|-1) 10 days ago To be clear, this is only win10 with no other apps installed and just left to idle, correct? permalink parent 1 reply [–] european 5 points (+7|-2) 9 days ago Are any addresses , ports or protocols particularly worrying? Are there likely innocent explanations for any of the connections? Do you worry 'someone' or 'something' can identify you based on this post and prevent the instally carrying out other nefarious actions such as uploading one you actually use the computer? permalink parent [–] jagerhayles 4 points (+6|-2) 10 days ago That's a little bit too basic of a summary. permalink parent 1 reply [+] hulksmashed -11 points 10 days ago (show children) [–] Ywis 1 points (+1|-0) 9 days ago Setting all the Windows 10 privacy option so you are most secure doesn't work. They're getting lots of data from you and you can't stop it if you use Windows. permalink parent [–] UsernameShoesername 0 points (+0|-0) 2 days ago Unfortunately, it's not your property. You have a limited usage license which you agree to by installing and using the software. This is Microsoft's whole attitude: it's their property, and they can do with it as they like. They even sell this as them improving their product by seeing how it works on peoples' computers (which they don't own.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted February 13, 2016 Author Share Posted February 13, 2016 I like to see the results after using DWS.exe (Destroy Windows Spying tool) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 15 minutes ago, saeed_dc said: I like to see the results after using DWS.exe (Destroy Windows Spying tool) Old news already posted CheesusCrust deleted all his post, or ether Voat did, seems his account no longer exists . Hes not going to do no more test it seems unless he does them elsewhere . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted February 13, 2016 Author Share Posted February 13, 2016 2 minutes ago, steven36 said: Old news already posted CheesusCrust deleted all his post or ether Voat did seems his account no longer exists . Hes not be going no more test it seems unless he does them elsewhere . Couldn't find it in search so new in here. he could've posted his findings a lot of better places but seems like he isn't motivated enough for this job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vibranium Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 The plot thickens. Maybe he decided that it was best to disappear? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 1 minute ago, saeed_dc said: Couldn't find it in search so new in here. he could've posted his findings a lot of better places but seems like he isn't motivated enough for this job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted February 13, 2016 Author Share Posted February 13, 2016 3 minutes ago, steven36 said: oh cool, my source was here though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 Just now, saeed_dc said: oh cool, my source was here though My source was the real source site not the bloggers trying make news out of someone trying to help someone ..Its a wonder nsane has not made the news yet for trying help people block windows 10 telemetry . If we posted our ip sniffer results they most likely would Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted February 13, 2016 Author Share Posted February 13, 2016 3 minutes ago, steven36 said: My source was the real source site not the bloggers trying make news out of someone trying to help someone ..Its a wonder nsane has not made the news yet for trying help people block windows 10 telemetry . If we posted our ip sniffer results they most likely would which IP sniffer you use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 5 minutes ago, saeed_dc said: which IP sniffer you use? In windows Windows 10 FWC has a built in sniffer https and http also i use wireshark in windows and Linux and i have messed around with others . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted February 13, 2016 Author Share Posted February 13, 2016 7 minutes ago, steven36 said: In windows Windows 10 FWC has a built in sniffer https and http also i use wireshark in windows and Linux and i have messed around others . Microsoft Network Capture and parser is a good alternative to Wireshark, it adds the functionality to only focus on a specific .exe file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 Just now, saeed_dc said: Microsoft Network Capture and parser is a good alternative to Wireshark, it adds the functionality to only focus on a specific .exe file. Windows 10 fwc does the samething and lets you block the exe or the ips ether one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted February 13, 2016 Author Share Posted February 13, 2016 Just now, steven36 said: Windows 10 fwc does the samething and lets you block the exe or the ips ether one. but not many people can use it as it causes interference with the main anti-virus/internet security software (Kaspersky, Bitdeffender etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reefa Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 Topic Locked Nothing New Here.. It's all been Posted Before.... 29 minutes ago, steven36 said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.