dcs18 Posted July 26, 2014 Author Share Posted July 26, 2014 Is there anyone who can help me via team-viewer because "fake serial" still appears after few minutes after making outbound rules?Which firewall are you using?Have you activated your IDM, at least once - after creating your outbound rule? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abbasi Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 Is there anyone who can help me via team-viewer because "fake serial" still appears after few minutes after making outbound rules?Which firewall are you using?Have you activated your IDM, at least once - after creating your outbound rule?It was activated earlier. I am using window firewall , however, windows firewall is managed by Norton 360. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 26, 2014 Author Share Posted July 26, 2014 It was activated earlier.IDM needs to be re-activated after creating the outbound rule for all those 24 IPs.I am using window firewall , however, windows firewall is managed by Norton 360.If it still does not work - you might need to wait for a Norton User to TeamView your setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkkdjb Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 well i m using palemoon and sadly these rule do not apply to itbut i do hope that the vast majority of firefox users will help in the development/updation of the topic.:thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 26, 2014 Author Share Posted July 26, 2014 well i m using palemoon and sadly these rule do not apply to itbut i do hope that the vast majority of firefox users will help in the development/updation of the topic. :thumbsup:You can post your take on Pale Moon, if you like.As far as Firefox is concerned, was planning to add the block rules for Search Engines and Add-ons, as well - however, those two need to essentially be allowed to update themselves.edit: need new block image for firefox firewallShall post a new image after tea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkkdjb Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 You can post your take on Pale Moon, if you like.IDK maybe but not happening right now.As far as Firefox is concerned, was planning to add the block rules for Search Engines and Add-ons, as well - however, those need to essentially be updated.that's why i said 'hope others take active participation'although i think it wud be diff 4 cyberfox,waterfox etc as well but i think it(the firefox) rule may apply to the nightlies as wellsomeone using nightly can report it :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 Why do you use Firewall rules to turn off updates in Firefox ?At the top of the Firefox window, click on the Firefox button (Tools menu ) and then click Options. 2.Click the Advanced panel. 3.Click the Update tab. The auto-update options are displayed. Just tick never check for updates box and then you can just check them when fell like it or just download installers.It is professional to use a multi-layered approach - remember, I mentioned to you that I administer to hundreds of client machines. Besides, the firewall approach brings the following advantage over the conventional one:--Please note - the configuration at the following graphic illustrations overrides the setting on the Firefox interfaceFWIW, I use firewalling on Firefox despite the fact that the options on any of my configurations are disabled and do not allow the luxury of being easily changed by my clients:--Oh so you use this for a Network so they cant update in that case it would be very good . :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 26, 2014 Author Share Posted July 26, 2014 edit: need new block image for firefox firewallShall post a fresh image after tea. Done!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 26, 2014 Author Share Posted July 26, 2014 hey i am sorry to ask but can you explain your method to me in a step-by-step way (not experienced user)Which firewall are you using? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vkarthik Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 No need ofpre-activated versions,Trial resetters,paches,cracks,keygens,host-file blocking,ip's blockingNew MethodSite: http://www.mediafire.comSharecode[?]: /download/365e34yaitnl5a2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 No need ofpre-activated versions,Trial resetters,paches,cracks,keygens,host-file blocking,ip's blockingNew MethodSite: http://www.mediafire.comSharecode[?]: /download/365e34yaitnl5a2 Invalid or Deleted File. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 26, 2014 Author Share Posted July 26, 2014 Preventing TeamViewer From Self-updating Please note . . . . . . . . this tutorial is outdated due to the new TeamViewer policies - the guide has been updated (post # 1954.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dukun Cabul Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 By creating a block rule for your network adapter, I see that you have blocked (IDM + all other programs from using those IPs) - isn't it possible for the Bitdefender firewall to block Internet Download Manager (IDMan.exe) exclusively (like other firewalls?)With the following Bitdefender configuration I'm still able to visit IDM home site and download IDM installer from its official servers.1. Turn off IDM (Exit IDM from systray). 2. Remove current/existing IDM rule.3. Add new rules to block IDM IP's For now, I just need to block the following 3 IP's to make it works, but I recommend you to block all known IDM IPs (provided on page 1). - Block IP address: 50.97.41.98 - Block IP address: 184.173.188.104 - Block IP address: 184.173.188.1074. Reboot.5. Activate IDM with any fake serial number. - A5BW3-JLH56-OKN71-W6OXL - CV4NT-32TRI-CIVE4-8DCQ1 - O45XS-T55G7-4M94S-10ERX - LFMZY-VWPMJ-Z93W6-UU7HU - XIWUM-0W726-B4SFO-Q5FENDone !BTW, I prefer to use this trial resetter instead of blocking the IP's ..... more clean I think ;)@echo offmkdir %SystemRoot%\System32\Testif %errorlevel%==0 (rmdir %SystemRoot%\System32\Test) else (echo Please "Run as administrator"echo.pauseexit)if exist "%SystemRoot%\SysWOW64\" (set "Path=%ProgramFiles(x86)%"set "Key1=HKCR\Wow6432Node\CLSID"set "Key2=HKCU\Software\DownloadManager"set "Key3=HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Internet Download Manager") else (set "Path=%ProgramFiles%"set "Key1=HKCR\CLSID"set "Key2=HKCU\Software\DownloadManager"set "Key3=HKLM\SOFTWARE\Internet Download Manager")tasklist /fi "imagename eq IDMan.exe" | find /i "IDMan.exe"if %errorlevel%==0 taskkill /im IDMan.exe /f /techo %Key1%\{07999AC3-058B-40BF-984F-69EB1E554CA7} [7]>>Permissionsecho %Key1%\{5ED60779-4DE2-4E07-B862-974CA4FF2E9C} [7]>>Permissionsecho %Key1%\{6DDF00DB-1234-46EC-8356-27E7B2051192} [7]>>Permissionsecho %Key1%\{7B8E9164-324D-4A2E-A46D-0165FB2000EC} [7]>>Permissionsecho %Key1%\{D5B91409-A8CA-4973-9A0B-59F713D25671} [7]>>Permissionsregini Permissionsdel Permissionsreg delete %Key1%\{07999AC3-058B-40BF-984F-69EB1E554CA7} /freg delete %Key1%\{5ED60779-4DE2-4E07-B862-974CA4FF2E9C} /freg delete %Key1%\{6DDF00DB-1234-46EC-8356-27E7B2051192} /freg delete %Key1%\{7B8E9164-324D-4A2E-A46D-0165FB2000EC} /freg delete %Key1%\{D5B91409-A8CA-4973-9A0B-59F713D25671} /freg delete "%Key3%" /fif exist "%Path%\Internet Download Manager\IDMan.exe" (reg delete %Key2% /v Email /freg delete %Key2% /v FName /freg delete %Key2% /v LName /freg delete %Key2% /v Serial /f) else (reg delete %Key2% /f)echo.echo Done !pauseexit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petok Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 Preventing 1e100.net (Google) From Over-flooding Your Internet ConnectionThe Problem:–While using your browser, most of you might have noticed 1e100.net spawning hundreds of UDP / TCP endpoints - those who have not encountered the same may want to try out TCPView on their system/s to audit whether these internet packets are over-flooding their internet connectivity or not.The Solution:–Use your firewall to block Any / All Programs from outbound the IP range 74.125.0.1–74.125.255.254 as illustrated below:Firefox Users may take extra precautions, by disabling the following two, in Firefox - under the Security menu:--Block reported attack sitesBlock reported web forgeriesThe Testimonial:–Post # 56Edit:--Post # 1 and post # 2 updated.If you can explain for this domain I not understand what is blocked and what is not working after blocking ... Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therru Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 Preventing 1e100.net (Google) From Over-flooding Your Internet ConnectionThe Problem:–While using your browser, most of you might have noticed 1e100.net spawning hundreds of UDP / TCP endpoints - those who have not encountered the same may want to try out TCPView on their system/s to audit whether these internet packets are over-flooding their internet connectivity or not.The Solution:–Use your firewall to block Any / All Programs from outbound the IP range 74.125.0.1–74.125.255.254 as illustrated below:Firefox Users may take extra precautions, by disabling the following two, in Firefox - under the Security menu:--Block reported attack sitesBlock reported web forgeriesThe Testimonial:–Post # 56Edit:--Post # 1 and post # 2 updated.Same with Kaspersky? I tried to add those addresses there but in some reason Kaspersky does not remember those, when I hit Edit those numbers are gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therru Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 It does not remember Remote addresses which I typed there. When I hit Edit those numbers are gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 27, 2014 Author Share Posted July 27, 2014 Thanks for those illustrations - now, just waiting for Bitdefender Users to confirm that it is working for everyone. For now, I just need to block the following 3 IP's to make it works (Of course, you may block more IP's).It is always safer to use all recommended IPs - IDM can decide to rotate those IPs, anytime (as some Users have already discovered.)BTW, I prefer to use this trial resetter instead of blocking the IP's ..... more clean I think ;)Nope, Trial Resetters can never be categorized as clean - besides, a Trial Resetter won't stop those unwanted internet traffic and moreover will need to be executed periodically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 27, 2014 Author Share Posted July 27, 2014 Preventing 1e100.net (Google) From Over-flooding Your Internet ConnectionThe Problem:–While using your browser, most of you might have noticed 1e100.net spawning hundreds of UDP / TCP endpoints - those who have not encountered the same may want to try out TCPView on their system/s to audit whether these internet packets are over-flooding their internet connectivity or not.The Solution:–Use your firewall to block Any / All Programs from outbound the IP range 74.125.0.1–74.125.255.254 as illustrated below:Firefox Users may take extra precautions, by disabling the following two, in Firefox - under the Security menu:--Block reported attack sitesBlock reported web forgeriesThe Testimonial:–Post # 56Edit:--Post # 1 and post # 2 updated.If you can explain for this domain I not understand what is blocked and what is not working after blocking ... Thanks.Did you read The Testimonial thread - the domain that is blocked belongs to Google (you can always find out what is blocked through the whois site.)You can also use http://www.ip2location.com/free.asp to perform an IP lookup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matekudasai115 Posted July 27, 2014 Share Posted July 27, 2014 self delete, sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dukun Cabul Posted July 27, 2014 Share Posted July 27, 2014 It is always safer to use all recommended IPs - IDM can decide to rotate those IPs, anytime (as some Users have already discovered. Yup .... you are right !In the past : 50.97.41.98 = star.tonec.comCurrently : 50.97.41.98 = registeridm.comshould we go back to use the host block method ... :rofl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 27, 2014 Author Share Posted July 27, 2014 It is always safer to use all recommended IPs - IDM can decide to rotate those IPs, anytime (as some Users have already discovered. Yup .... you are right !In the past : 50.97.41.98 = star.tonec.comCurrently : 50.97.41.98 = registeridm.comshould we go back to use the host block method ... :rofl:It is not possible to block IPs using hosts edits- it just does not have that capability. It can only block hostname - hence the name hosts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarko Posted July 27, 2014 Share Posted July 27, 2014 So as dcs18 said, it's safer to block all known IP's :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted July 27, 2014 Author Share Posted July 27, 2014 I COULD NOT FIGURE IT OUT IN BITDEFENDER ,HOW TO BLOCK THE IPS O ITHow to block it with Bitdefender? ThanksI tested it for idmIt isn't workingIt still checks for updatesAnd yes...I've already followed ur every stepDonno...but bitdefender kinda sux..Both with shitty firewall as well as increased boot time + resource hoggerCan you guys report back whether the new illustrations posted by Dukun Cabul, at post 467 are working, for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therru Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 Got it: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therru Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 Bitdefender + IDM:I'm still able to check updates and navigate to IDM homepage. Also managed to download IDM app from IDM homepage:Fake serial detected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.