dcs18 Posted June 17, 2017 Author Share Posted June 17, 2017 Links at the OP and credits duly updated to reflect and point to the new update for hamanokaito's Registry Permission fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sledge101 Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 here i was thinking of putting dcs18 kiddin...anyway i use only this key idm62-34567-89012-34567 ( i just type this one ), mind you, idman.exe is not patch or any other files. and its working , downloading . see snapshots. no nags or whatever, vpkey absent on several restarts anymore and other thrash registry not recurring also. Restarted again online close idm processses and reopen back several times, typed key holds nicely. #2 and #5 will be updated later. Back to work again... till then..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 40 minutes ago, sledge101 said: idman.exe is not patch or any other files. But aren't you modifying the registry? . . . Also I just checked, the serial check while downloading(test.internetdownloadmanager.com) has been disabled again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 6 minutes ago, 0bin said: Friends, just a share, if using Simple DNSCrypt two things: With Kaspersky 2017 doesn't connect to internet, with 2016 ok; With Eset ok. Sometime you need to set the services to autorestart, if they fail at boot, so I set a rule what do if not do. Prefer something with DNSSEC and NoLogs, also one last thing, if like me you monitor you dns request, in your pihole you will see something like ahshdmandx, insted of www.facebook.com for example How to configure it(SimpleDNSCrypt)? Also, I checked out pi-Hole and I don't have the system requirements needed for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 Just now, 0bin said: I use it from years, sometime happen the service doesn't start automatically, set dnscryptproxy 1 and 2 to recovery what do when the service doesn't work reboot the service. Only primary is not enough? Plus how does it support WF? It was still passing IDM IPs with only primary service. 1 minute ago, 0bin said: PiHole requirement for me, Pi1, Raspbian without GUI, and is keeped alive by router usb power. Don't have this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, 0bin said: I think you can install also on other Linux environment, not only Raspberry Pi with Raspbian and let that act as you first DNS server, about IDM don't know I tried but I don't like it and removed. About DNSCrypt I enabled also the secondary resolver, if the first is down the second should be up? No linux as well, that's why I said I don't have the setup for it. It's not about the server,I am more interested in knowing how, if at all, it helps in making WF robust? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 Just now, 0bin said: Well, your DNS queries are not in plain text, no man in the middle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNSCrypt also nice thing you can switch your dns really simple. But that was exactly what was happening, IDM was still bypassing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 Just now, 0bin said: I'm not expert in that, but I think because was IPs It wasn't the IPs, I can assure that much. 1 minute ago, 0bin said: That software for me is a security risk for other aspects. Desperate speeds call for desperate measure. I agree with you but for my situation it's still the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 Personally, I actually like this move by Dave here. He showed us exactly what's wrong with our setup and what enhancements could be done. I lernt quite a lot from Dave's anti-piracy measure. So, it was a step worth it....both for him and for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 3 minutes ago, 0bin said: Dave is the dev of that download manager? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 17, 2017 Author Share Posted June 17, 2017 1 hour ago, Undertaker said: Also I just checked, the serial check while downloading(test.internetdownloadmanager.com) has been disabled again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTJB Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 @Undertaker @dcs18 , IDM will always give you the fake registration, no matter what and how you block the app! I am surprised how you fight and expect to block something which save it's logs somewhere in event with info that the app never have been used with registration form for activation - simple you wasn't fill the registration info in registration window and in result you never completed this request with internet connection. Registration come with warning about fake, because the logs give info about mismatch. When you force registration with reg file, the app than need and check event logs for more details. Just like apps store limitation period in trial mode. The only condition is internet connection history during first running with provided registration info. First I had no success with Adguard Beta on fresh Windows OS. Please confirm is this method still work to make another one attempt to be ensure and continue with cleaning of my system. IDM quickly goes into Fake Registration if you entered registration into registry and you run IDM for first time registered but current internet connection is disabled, "Turned Off". There is no any info that you was connected with required server! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirri Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 16 hours ago, Undertaker said: But that test is also outdated yup. that's 4 years ago 16 hours ago, Undertaker said: @sirri You're only blocking them at port 80, in addition to port 80, you have to block them at port 443 also(especially 169.55.40.5, although all should be added). what if I change to Any ? would it blocked all ports right ? 16 hours ago, dcs18 said: Sirri, you rules First under the IDMallowed rule, tick (enable) the IP box and see if you can input the option for Any. If that fails to work, re-order the above rules by promoting the IDMallowed to stay above IDMblocked. I shall when I back to office. Now I'm away dear 16 hours ago, dcs18 said: should I do same as blocked rules ? I mean those IP's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirri Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 15 hours ago, dcs18 said: sirri, I hope you're aware that you can also block IDM while retaining your Windows Firewall Control (WFC.) I was using native Windows Firewall method Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sledge101 Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 guys it creates a registry there to bypass it and overrides all policy underlying those classes, if you modify it , it would not create anymore everytime windows starts, you open idm or even downloading. We clean those thrash registry right? but it still recurs ....t because the main license registry key exists to check for it. It is still bypass as there is a reg key there which elevates the process if that "specific key" still exists. Just need to know that one.... Anyway, if i have time i will share it to you guys for testing With regards I posted before, - simple dns crypt , it works however at system level as per takers discussion before, i can do browse as per pc setup but may not be variable for each users pc software. Furthermore, there is no whitelist to allow specific sites to connect. that is the disadvantage however i do not know about comodo dns crypting but looks promising as per dcs18 posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamanokaito Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 1 hour ago, sledge101 said: guys it creates a registry there to bypass it and overrides all policy underlying those classes, if you modify it , it would not create anymore everytime windows starts, you open idm or even downloading. We clean those thrash registry right? but it still recurs ....t because the main license registry key exists to check for it. It is still bypass as there is a reg key there which elevates the process if that "specific key" still exists. Just need to know that one.... Anyway, if i have time i will share it to you guys for testing With regards I posted before, - simple dns crypt , it works however at system level as per takers discussion before, i can do browse as per pc setup but may not be variable for each users pc software. Furthermore, there is no whitelist to allow specific sites to connect. that is the disadvantage however i do not know about comodo dns crypting but looks promising as per dcs18 posted. That right. IDM create more 2 keys to bypass firewall windows. So you can't use firewall windows to block connect check sv of idm. Windows firewall control can't block check sv of idm. Because windows firewall control use source firewall of windows. Just have windows can fix that bypass. P/s: So you just can use firewall third block connect check sv of idm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sledge101 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 17 minutes ago, hamanokaito said: That right. IDM create more 2 keys to bypass firewall windows. So you can't use firewall windows to block connect check sv of idm. Windows firewall control can't block check sv of idm. Because windows firewall control use source firewall of windows. Just have windows can fix that bypass. P/s: So you just can use firewall third block connect check sv of idm. true. anyway i am in thr testing process my typed key , this is not a random generated by a keygen or a blocklisted retail key and idm.exe is not patch @hamnokaito. Working nicely here . Yes, you can use a third block via fwb/ipsec/dns but still testing if it is possible not to... will see @dcs18, adguard supports dns crypting already.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamanokaito Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, sledge101 said: true. anyway i am in thr testing process my typed key , this is not a random generated by a keygen or a blocklisted retail key and idm.exe is not patch @hamnokaito. Working nicely here . Ok ! will waiting your fix. P/s: just can hack registry and enjoy . Don't change any thing from file exe to registry. You still can update online Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 @dcs18 I guess you are blocking it at system level then? @BTJB Adguard method continues to work for me. @Dukun Cabul Can you confirm it's workin on your side as well? @sirri Any port would be the best option. I'm sorry I'm in a hurry so just had a glance on each posts. Will read carefully and reply when I'm back(after 10-12 hours) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sledge101 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 24 minutes ago, hamanokaito said: Ok ! will waiting your fix. P/s: just can hack registry and enjoy . Don't change any thing from file exe to registry. You still can update online Yes, all the elevation thingie and all stuffs there. the old school posted by dcs 18 , is still applicable just need to mod some few reg keys to stop the license check / update on any IDM activity. Other auxillary reg key bleeding recreated by the program can be done/deleted using reg thrash program and will not recur. if you update it inside the program 2 constant keys are generated however if you apply the fix before, it will automatically be blocked with no data on it so using reg thrash aggain you can delete it or not , doesnt matter anyway. The bypass thingie is actually another policy registry . Soon mate, currently testing.... and if i have time ill be testing the ip/dns/ip sec policy if we can get away with it as i cannot say for now. No hamanokaito, patching file exe i am not comfortable using that method and as much as possible would not modify that if there are other methods which are fine. till then back to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamanokaito Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 15 minutes ago, sledge101 said: Yes, all the elevation thingie and all stuffs there. the old school posted by dcs 18 , is still applicable just need to mod some few reg keys to stop the license check / update on any IDM activity. Other auxillary reg key bleeding recreated by the program can be done/deleted using reg thrash program and will not recur. if you update it inside the program 2 constant keys are generated however if you apply the fix before, it will automatically be blocked with no data on it so using reg thrash aggain you can delete it or not , doesnt matter anyway. The bypass thingie is actually another policy registry . Soon mate, currently testing.... and if i have time ill be testing the ip/dns/ip sec policy if we can get away with it as i cannot say for now. No hamanokaito, patching file exe i am not comfortable using that method and as much as possible would not modify that if there are other methods which are fine. till then back to work. Heheh. Good News, i will waiting your fix and test it ! P/s: Yup. I see idm create 2 keys no data. This 2 key to bypass firewall windows !!! Well. From build 11 idm add 3 registry key, 1 key have data and 2 key no data. If you have 2 key no data you will got fake serial. Key auto create after you exit idm and open it Or you restart your pc. <Can get 2 key after you download any link> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 18, 2017 Author Share Posted June 18, 2017 7 hours ago, BTJB said: @dcs18 , IDM will always give you the fake registration, no matter what and how you block the app! It's working fine, here — have been blocking IDM successfully with a blacklisted key and on a fully contaminated registry, as well. You can read all about it on the last 3-4 pages. 3 hours ago, sledge101 said: Yes, you can use a third block via fwb/ipsec/dns but still testing if it is possible not to... will see The firewall method is working on select firewalls — on the rest, it works if DNS encrypting is supplemented. The IPSec method does not work on its own — it works if supplemented with DNS, though. 3 hours ago, Undertaker said: @dcs18I guess you are blocking it at system level then? Yes, that's the exact way I want it — wouldn't want clients to be able to surf that site and start downloading the latest installer before my deployment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted June 18, 2017 Author Share Posted June 18, 2017 6 hours ago, sirri said: 22 hours ago, dcs18 said: sirri, I hope you're aware that you can also block IDM while retaining your Windows Firewall Control (WFC.) I was using native Windows Firewall method Why don't you just go back to Windows Firewall and use DNSCrypt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dukun Cabul Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 6 hours ago, Undertaker said: @Dukun Cabul Can you confirm it's workin on your side as well? I was just testing AdGuard for a while, and now it's already uninstalled Currently using Trial Reset method ..... until I found the best one (for me) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTJB Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 1. Just install IDM on fresh Windows System! 2. Disable your Internet Connection, tear out your cable! Leave connected only the cable for the PC power! 3. Register IDM with REG file. 4. You just fucked up right now with Fake Serial. So, why you always talking about blocking? What you achieve? Lying yourself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.