Dukun Cabul Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Indeed this sounds a bit strange .... Indeed this sounds a bit strange ...... I need someone running Windows Vista and willing to test my script Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 2/19/2015 at 7:43 PM, dcs18 said: "Reducing The Firefox Memory-hogging Dramatically" (monitor post # 2 for all updates) The Firemin tutorial recreated — shall update it once I find the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Just now, Undertaker said: @dcs18 Can you give me two screenshots of the result from following commands: nslookup google.com ipconfig /all Make sure your dnscrypt is enabled and working. The first one may require you to provide additional net connectivity. w.r.t the second one, just show the adapter for which you have enabled dnscrypt and you can hide all other details - just show the 'dns server' entries in that command. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 2 hours ago, Undertaker said: 3 hours ago, Undertaker said: @dcs18 Can you give me two screenshots of the result from following commands: nslookup google.com ipconfig /all Make sure your dnscrypt is enabled and working. The first one may require you to provide additional net connectivity. w.r.t the second one, just show the adapter for which you have enabled dnscrypt and you can hide all other details - just show the 'dns server' entries in that command. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 7, 2018 Author Share Posted March 7, 2018 15 hours ago, 0bin said: Spotify: Whitelist: spclient.wg.spotify.com this domain is now used both for ads, and for content, giving you the error message no connection detected. Using PiHole Whitelist that domain, as you cannot use wildcards into PiHole, ads and content are now on same domain spclient.wg.spotify.com Using AdGuard for Android: you can also obtain a similar result, enabling dns filtering for AdGuard for Android. Anyway, the new .apk include a new NXDOMAIN "=" that cannot be blocked, and that seems related to this new mechanism... The graph.facebook.com entry is present on WhatsApp, as well — lost spirits that've sold their condemned souls to Faecesbook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k2a Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 On 2/19/2015 at 3:13 PM, dcs18 said: "Reducing The Firefox Memory-hogging Dramatically" (monitor post # 2 for all updates) Before Reduction:— Hidden Content After Reduction:— Hidden Content The Background:— Hidden Content The Procedure:— Hidden Content Friendly Tip:— Hidden Content firefox memory usage 36% to 1,2% - oh boy thanks again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 4 hours ago, k2a said: firefox memory usage 36% to 1,2% - oh boy thanks again Any changes in the disk usage? Sudden spike or something like that when using? @dcs18 You still use firemin? How's it playing out in your PC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k2a Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 9 minutes ago, Undertaker said: Any changes in the disk usage? Sudden spike or something like that when using? nothing, why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 On 3/1/2018 at 1:56 PM, Ecarion said: Apparently, there is a little difference between the both (uMatrix_Legacy_v1.1.4 and uMatrix_WebExtension_v1.3.3Beta8). Because after the installation, the request are still coming from the same website (googlevideo.com) but now it isn't the same column (media has been replace by xhr). This is what I was saying. And even by allowing xhr requests from googlevideo, I receive no ads. But then again, it maybe a geo thing like said before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, k2a said: nothing, why? Had some problems like the one mentioned here: http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/222515-compilation-of-tutorials-guides-tips-updates/?do=findComment&comment=900375 If you can please check for the same and report back. Test it on this thread: http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/279313-what-are-you-listening-to-3/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k2a Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 19 minutes ago, Undertaker said: Had some problems like the one mentioned here: http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/222515-compilation-of-tutorials-guides-tips-updates/?do=findComment&comment=900375 If you can please check for the same and report back. Test it on this thread: http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/279313-what-are-you-listening-to-3/ system disk usage - 0,1 -1% to 3-7%(when loading the site) hm..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 " Block IP Ranges in AdGuard " (By using RegEx rules) Caution Note:— RegEx filter rules are comparitively slow by nature. So, if your IP range is small it is always better to use individual IP-blocking rules. How to convert IP range into RegEx:— Learn it. Go to this site: http://www.analyticsmarket.com/freetools/ipregex Enter the first IP of your IP range and enter the last IP of your IP range and click 'Generate RegEX'. Copy the rule. (It requires modification before it can be used in AdGuard). The Procedure:— Modifying the RegEx rule:- 1) For simplicity sake, let's say that the RegEx rule that you got from the above step looks like:- ^169\.55\.0\.(2(2[4-7]))$ 2) Now you need to add the backward slash (/), at the beginning(before ^ sign) and at the end(before the $ sign) of the RegEx rule. So, the modified rule will now look like this:- /^169\.55\.0\.(2(2[4-7]))/$ 3) And now for use with AdGuard just add the network modifier to your rule, this is mandatory. You can also use other modifiers like important or app. So, the final rule will look like this:- /^169\.55\.0\.(2(2[4-7]))/$network Proof Of Concept:— Credits: @dcs18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 13 minutes ago, k2a said: system disk usage - 0,1 -1% to 3-7%(when loading the site) hm..? Ok thanx for the feedback, looks like it is indeed playing out nicely for you. Since that is not such a considerable disk usage. My CPU and disk usage went through roof while using it. Maybe I'll give it another try in some time unless someone comes first with the counterargument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 7, 2018 Author Share Posted March 7, 2018 6 minutes ago, Undertaker said: 12 minutes ago, k2a said: 36 minutes ago, Undertaker said: Had some problems like the one mentioned here: http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/222515-compilation-of-tutorials-guides-tips-updates/?do=findComment&comment=900375 If you can please check for the same and report back. Test it on this thread: http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/279313-what-are-you-listening-to-3/ system disk usage - 0,1 -1% to 3-7%(when loading the site) hm..? Ok thanx for the feedback, looks like it is indeed playing out nicely for you. Since that is not sucah a considerable disk usage. My CPU and disk usage went through roof while using it. Maybe I'll give it another try in some time unless someone comes first with the counterargument. I'd be interested to see how Firemin pans out, on your new (higher-end) laptop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 1 minute ago, dcs18 said: I'd be interested to see how Firemin pans out, on your new (higher-end) laptop. I'm interested just for the purpose of testing. Even with Firefox using 1GB alongwith the rest of the system processes, it's not even consuming 25% memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 " Block IP Ranges in AdGuard " @vhick Specially for you : http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/222515-compilation-of-tutorials-guides-tips-updates/?do=findComment&comment=1303978 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 7, 2018 Author Share Posted March 7, 2018 1 hour ago, Undertaker said: " Block IP Ranges in AdGuard " (By using RegEx rules) I propose a toast to developers of firewalls . . . . . . . . sleepless nights to ya! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 7, 2018 Author Share Posted March 7, 2018 AdGuard is now 6.2.437.2171 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 8, 2018 Author Share Posted March 8, 2018 1) On any site, when using the Filtering on this website on the AdGuard Assistant to disable AdGuard does the green checkmark turn red? 2) If the AdGuard Assistant used again (on the same site) this time, to enable AdGuard — does it succeed in enabling AdGuard (meaning — is it able to remove/delete the rule created at point # 1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 52 minutes ago, dcs18 said: 1) On any site, when using the Filtering on this website on the AdGuard Assistant to disable AdGuard does the green checkmark turn red? Yes https://i.imgur.com/APzBnYg.png 53 minutes ago, dcs18 said: 2) If the AdGuard Assistant used again (on the same site) this time, to enable AdGuard — does it succeed in enabling AdGuard (meaning — is it able to remove/delete the rule created at point # 1) Yes https://i.imgur.com/PRwhl7Z.png You seem to be using an older version of Assistant(cue - checkmark). I'm on v4.1.7. However, it was working fine before also for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 8, 2018 Author Share Posted March 8, 2018 Nah, it's the latest 4.0.16 — you must be referring to the development build. Started seeing the new behavior after a brief test of the Nightly 6.3.671.2617 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Don't you use beta version of AdGuard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 8, 2018 Author Share Posted March 8, 2018 I used the Nightly — that's when my AdGuard started to boogie-woogie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Oh, I use the beta version which is currently the same as stable version but yeah the AG userscripts get the beta updates. Frankly, don't think the AG nightly is yet at a level to be used even by enthusiasts. Also haven't you set to receive beta updates in general settings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 8, 2018 Author Share Posted March 8, 2018 Nope, my copy (as y'all know) was just recently rebuilt from scratch — only working my way upwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.