Jump to content

Police Seize Two Perfect Privacy VPN Servers


Batu69

Recommended Posts

VPN provider Perfect Privacy has had two of its servers seized by Dutch police, as part of an active investigation. Police bypassed the VPN service and went directly to the company's hosting provider, I3D, who complied with a subpoena requesting the hardware. At the time of writing, it remains unclear why the servers in question were taken.

VPN services are a great tool for people who want to increase their privacy and security online.

While most people use them for legitimate purposes, VPNs are also frequently linked to nefarious activity, as criminals prefer to stay anonymous online too.

 

As a result, VPNs regularly come up when police investigate online crime. This is also what appears to have happened with two servers that were leased by VPN provider Perfect Privacy.

 

A few days ago the company informed its customers that two of its servers had been seized by the police in Rotterdam, Netherlands. The authorities went directly to the hosting company I3D and the VPN provider itself wasn’t contacted by law enforcement.

 

“Currently we have no further information since the responsible law enforcement agency did not get in touch with us directly, we were merely informed by our hoster,” Perfect Privacy says.

 

Despite losing control over two servers, Perfect Privacy assures its customers that no personally identifiable data is present on the seized hardware. Like many other VPNs, the company maintains a strict no-logging policy.

 

“Since we are not logging any data there is currently no reason to believe that any user data was compromised,” the VPN provider says.

TorrentFreak reached out to I3D, who told us that they can’t comment on any specifics. However, the hoster stresses that it handles these type of requests in compliance with the law, while keeping the interests of their customers in mind.

 

“When the Dutch police contact us with a subpoena, we work with them in a professional manner and ensure their request and our responses are in compliance with the Dutch law,” I3D informs us.

 

“We think with the affected customer as well, for example by making temporary capacity available so the customer does not suffer extended downtime during the investigation.”

Perfect Privacy confirms that they are happy with how I3D handled this issue. Two replacement servers were quickly put in place meaning that the seizures didn’t result in any significant downtime.

 

In any case, it is good to see that the provider in question is being open about what happened. Unfortunately, that’s not always obvious for companies in this position.

 

TorrentFreak

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 12
  • Views 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

What does this have to do with fileshareing  ? In Netherlands, downloading files for personal use is legal – it’s considered “fair use.

http://torrentfreak.com/dutch-parliament-downloading-movies-and-music-will-stay-legal-111224/

The reason they took those servers don't have nothing to do with fileshareing  and the OP dont even make clear  what the accused even done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, steven36 said:

What does this have to do with fileshareing  ? In Netherlands, downloading files for personal use is legal – it’s considered “fair use.

 

People who illegally share files commonly use VPNs and it isn't necessarily a Dutch violation they are investigating.  It could be they are assisting the FBI with an illegal filesharing case where the dutch servers were used as the remote VPN because someone thought if the files were seen coming thru the Netherlands that no one would bother to try and track them since it is legal there.  And maybe their scheme has backfired.  Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, straycat19 said:

 

People who illegally share files commonly use VPNs and it isn't necessarily a Dutch violation they are investigating.  It could be they are assisting the FBI with an illegal filesharing case where the dutch servers were used as the remote VPN because someone thought if the files were seen coming thru the Netherlands that no one would bother to try and track them since it is legal there.  And maybe their scheme has backfired.  Just saying.

Only time I ever knew the dutch to do something to a VPN  user was when one  made a bomb threat  and the CDN turned  the guy in . You come up with this crap but you dont even know what this guy done? Do you have any proof of this ?  . I hate when torrent freak post off the wall topics without even giving a link to the real source  . Its about as informative  as you're post telling me, it could of been this or that , I'm a realist  ,i dont  give a shit  about it could of been this or that .  i only want facts!

 

Here is the source post .

Quote

Today our hoster I3D informed us that the Dutch authorities have seized two servers from our location in Rotterdam. Currently we have no further information since the responsible law enforcement agency did not get in touch with us directly, we were merely informed by our hoster.

Since we are not logging any data there is currently no reason to believe that any user data was compromised.

I3D is kindly providing us with replacement servers (many thanks to them!) so that we can continue to operate our Rotterdam location with all three servers soon.

We will inform you in this thread if there is any new information available.

https://board.perfect-privacy.com/threads/server-seizure-in-rotterdam.1575/
https://www.perfect-privacy.com/blog/2016/08/24/server-seizure-in-rotterdam/

 

Even the source dont know why they were seized. and this happened Aug 24th  and still no update on why.   When the Russians done this to the PIA witch are in the USA  they stop hosting Russia . Millions  use PIA  and fileshare  everyday and that VPN is in the USA  and  they said they shut down before they would log that got posted in privacy news, like this should of been posted.. You know how many hackers use VPNs  and stuff  for real crimes ? And you think the Dutch is worried about something like P2P witch is legal there ?  :P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The reason they took those servers don't have nothing to do with fileshareing  and the OP dont even make clear  what the accused even done.

There is no mentioning of file sharing in the whole article or did i miss something? OP knows as much as the hoster itself, so what else could they make clearer? TF not only writes about file sharing, they write about privacy too, that's what the article is about.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


33 minutes ago, n0_risk! said:
4 hours ago, steven36 said:
The reason they took those servers don't have nothing to do with fileshareing  and the OP dont even make clear  what the accused even done.

 

There is no mentioning of file sharing in the whole article or did i miss something? OP knows as much as the hoster itself, so what else could they make clearer? TF not only writes about file sharing, they write about privacy too, that's what the article is about.

I agree it dont  say nothing about fileshareing, so thanks for repeating  what i just said,  but why is it posted in the fileshareing part of nsanedown's board?  if its not about it.? If i  or someone else posted it in software news or technology,  they would move it and this is no different :P

 

When i go to certain sections  of the board i want too read stuff that pertains to it, some times I dont want to read something i just dont go in it.   i want it to be in the right sections  when i come to this section i like to read about file sharing . Too read anything about filesharing i ended having  to visit other sites today !

 

I already know  TF  post stuff not about fileshareing .. they do this when they dont have nothing to post about, but seems others dont know the difference in privacy , netfilx  and filesharing  when it gets reposted here. Do they even read what  they post or do they thank just because it came from TF everything is about Filesharing?  :)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


6 hours ago, n0_risk! said:

There is no mentioning of file sharing in the whole article or did i miss something? OP knows as much as the hoster itself, so what else could they make clearer? TF not only writes about file sharing, they write about privacy too, that's what the article is about.

 

Yes, I know this article not about filesharing but I have a reason to post all articles from TorrentFreak on FileSharing News forum. (Admin/staffs discussion).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


No one told  the members they could post off topic news from this site in this section  so you're saying its OK for staff to post off topic news were ever they want but its not OK for members? .That's the problem when you have too many chiefs and not enough engines.  I dont see this in the guidelines nowhere ? Now you guys just make new rules up to help you're own ignorance out? Because you dont read what you post you just do it too see who can get the most post on the front page . You staff who try post everything on the whole board  and   are in charge  what normal members post too, should at lest try to lead by example  and be a good role model.  This  Quantity  before quality  .to see who be the number one poster of the week sucks, you should at lest  read what you post and not just be posting to be doing it. Also  anyone who put personalities  before principles and rules should not have board power ,

 

Whats the the need for discussions on whats on topic or off topic .Ether it is or it isn't  it's that simple  and making decisions on how things should be posted involves  the whole board .we all put our pants on the same way every morning  last i checked  and we should be made aware so we dont bother to ask questions  .I guess there no need to ask questions here ..if you going make a new rule up every time you screw up to make it  OK. :(

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

One, everything TF posts is either directly or indirectly related to FileSharing and freedom of sharing / free speech.

 

Two, honestly, this suits either way. But we do not exactly know what is this all about, we can only speculate about it. In addition, we had decided some time ago that in most cases TF articles should go in FileSharing News. No rules are being created here for the benefit of the staff, this was decided some time ago, not for the benefits of us, but the benefits of members and forums, to prevent any confusion and keep things streamlined. I think, this whole thing is complicated unnecessarily here.

 

Having said, we are always open to changes and we will look into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Thanks for all the suggestion guys. We had some discussions and have decided to move this thread to Security and Privacy News.

 

As I had said, we are open to changes and suggestions and have implemented it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...