Jump to content

Flash Replacement Shumway is as good as dead


Batu69

Recommended Posts

Mozilla started to work on Shumway, an open source Flash environment that did not depend on proprietary software back in 2012.

It made sense for Mozilla to work on Shumway at that time, considering that Flash was still the dominant force on the Web, and that Adobe did not cooperate with Mozilla in regards to the integration of Flash in Firefox like it did with Google.

 

Mozilla's goal was to integrate Shumway in Firefox in a way that it would allow Firefox users to access Flash content on the Internet without having to rely on Adobe Flash much like the company added a native PDF reader to Firefox to eliminate the need for plugin-based PDF readers.

 

Shumway landed in Firefox Nightly in late 2013, and Mozilla started to enable Shumway for some Flash contents on Amazon in early 2015.

Development of the Flash replacement slowed down considerable in September 2015 and rumors began to spread that Mozilla changed its priorities in regards to Shumway.

Shumway on the Firefox Graveyard

PiVeGou.jpg

 

If you check out the main Shumway tracking bug for implementation of the feature in Firefox, you will notice that it has been moved to Firefox Graveyard which means that work on it has more or less stopped.

 

Mozilla engineer Chris Peterson revealed in a comment that Shumway is no longer a priority for Mozilla.

 

Quote

Shumway is still on GitHub, but it's not on a path to ship in Firefox. Given our limited resources, other product priorities are currently more important than propping up Flash.

 

Flash lost much of its dominance on the Internet thanks to the rise of HTML5 and web-based technologies that deliver content to Internet users without the reliance on proprietary technology.

 

Media streaming is without doubt the area where Flash lost most ground but Google's announced that it will not accept Flash banners on its ad network from January 2, 2017 on, and that will impact the use of Flash significantly as well.

 

Considering that Mozilla had plans to enable Shumway for Flash advertisement first, as listed under Milestone 3 of the project, it may have influenced Mozilla in the decision making process as well.

 

In addition, Mozilla plans to end support for NPAPI plugins in Firefox for 2016 which means that the organization would have to have Shumway ready by that point in time to provide users of the browser with a replacement, or extend support for Flash instead.

 

It is possible -- theoretically at least -- that Mozilla will restart development on Shumway in the future but the likelihood of that happening is slim considering that Flash is being replaced by new technologies on the Internet. (via Sören Hentzschel)

 

Article source

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 2
  • Views 966
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Batu69 said:

In addition, Mozilla plans to end support for NPAPI plugins in Firefox for 2016 which means that the organization would have to have Shumway ready by that point in time to provide users of the browser with a replacement, or extend support for Flash instead.

As the article mentions, 'There is one exception to the rule and that is Adobe Flash. While support for all other NPAPI plugins is being removed in Firefox at the end of 2016, support for Adobe Flash remains available after that date.'

 

Next to this, Firefox users can already notice that Adobe is not waiting for the axe to fall on Flash. Check 'Tools - Addons - Plugins - 'Primetime Content Decryption Module provided by Adobe Systems, Incorporated' will be installed shortly'. I guess Mozilla's limited resources may indeed play a role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

When they had announced it, there were still videos sites for example, out there which did not switch to HTML5. Now, most of them being HTML5 supported and better support from browsers mean, while this addition is welcomed, it's not exactly required I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...