Jump to content

"Compilation Of Tutorials, Guides, Tips & Updates"


dcs18

Recommended Posts

For me, the (internet speed) benefit of Acrylic DNS Proxy was quite insignificant and secondary to the traffic encryption benefit delivered by Simple DNSCrypt — would've surely pursued Acrylic DNS Proxy, had it not interfered with my primary benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 7.3k
  • Views 1.1m
  • Created
  • Last Reply
32 minutes ago, dcs18 said:

had it not interfered with my primary benefit.

This is what I'm saying because simple dncrypt doesn't support migration to another port than the default one, the combo doesn't work and that's why the interference.

Use the dnscrypt-proxy cmd line version if you want to pair it up with Acrylic.

Otherwsie, the combo never really did work with Simple DNSCrypt.

You can't combine simple dnscrypt with acrylic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Does the server you're able to combine on the dnscrypt-proxy side fulfill all the following 3 criteria:—

  1. DNSSEC support
  2. No logging, and
  3. No filtering
Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, dcs18 said:

Does the server you're able to combine on the dnscrypt-proxy side fulfill all the following 3 criteria:—

and more....

 

-Use servers implementing the DNSCrypt protocol

-Use servers implementing the DNS-over-HTTPS protocol

-Server must support DNS security extensions (DNSSEC)

-Server must not log user queries (declarative)

-Server must not enforce its own blacklist (for parental control, ads blocking...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's the origianl project and the dev is the maintainer of the list, the same which is used by SimpleDNSCrypt. So, if not more be rest assured it won't be less than what you presently have. Since SimpleDNSCrypt uses the same author's lists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That's the gross total number of resolvers that can possibly work — but, how many resolvers are being made available to you, in your particular combination?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


8 hours ago, Undertaker said:

Dunno? Why the number is important?

The number signifies a transparency where you can enjoy WYSIWYG — brings you the ability to pick-n-choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 2/24/2018 at 1:56 AM, Undertaker said:

Please update to the latest version [...]

Apparently, there is a little difference between the both (uMatrix_Legacy_v1.1.4 and uMatrix_WebExtension_v1.3.3Beta8). Because after the installation, the request are still coming from the same website (googlevideo.com) but now it isn't the same column (media has been replace by xhr).

 

PS : I will try again later if I can (no internet for the moment).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It is now Recruit

Changelog:-

Now has access to the Veteran's only b00bs & p0rn section. :tooth:

:cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


15 minutes ago, Undertaker said:

Now has access to the Veteran's only b00bs & p0rn section. :tooth:

 

:rofl:

 

Yeah, but dcs took everything in front of me long time ago..... tx38TOr.gif

 

Now about serious things :

 

However, I have explained here what that means for me : http://www.nsaneforums.com/profile/82921-recruit/?status=37230&type=status

 

And I am happy that I already talked about you there. tRsCXmU.gif

I am really lucky that I met you guys, the rest are only statistics.....and talking about them... I cannot benefit right now, you know the reason. LxfIAXV.gif

 

 

Wish you all the best, Friends ! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Greenify is now 3.9.6 Build 39600 3.9.7 Build 39700

 

Kernel Adiutor is now 0.9.8 Beta 0.9.9 Beta

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 7/4/2015 at 4:59 PM, dcs18 said:

"An Encrypted Google Search Engine For Your Firefox"

(monitor post # 2 for all updates)

On 8/9/2015 at 4:41 PM, dcs18 said:

"A Leak-proof & Tamper-proof Windows Firewall Control (WFC)"

(monitor post # 2 for all updates)

Both of the above tutorials have been recreated but need to also be updated (especially the Windows Firewall Control one) — shall do the needful whenever time permits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


8 hours ago, dcs18 said:

 

Both of the above tutorials have been recreated but need to also be updated (especially the Windows Firewall Control one) — shall do the needful whenever time permits.

 

i remember i use that subdomain (encrypted.google.com) a long time ago when Google HTTPS implementation was in test stage

isn't it the same as using now https://www.google.xxx?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


9 hours ago, xanax said:

i remember i use that subdomain (encrypted.google.com) a long time ago when Google HTTPS implementation was in test stage

isn't it the same as using now https://www.google.xxx?

When the Encrypted Google tutorial was created, its unique advantage was that it would not disclose the referrer on the URLs of Google searches.

 

However, Google has now extended this advantage to all it's other domains — I've persisted with the Encrypted Google for the convenience of ad. blocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Matrix locked this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...