sanjoa Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 Site: www.quickshare.co.za Sharecode: /files/scs80ka0/keygen_3.exe.html [?] According to VirusTotal that Keygen is a virus. See report here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 Site: www.quickshare.co.za Sharecode: /files/scs80ka0/keygen_3.exe.html [?] According to VirusTotal that Keygen is a virus. See report here.Nope ;) Ikarus T3.1.1.88.0 2010.08.18 not-a-virus.Keygen.MediaMonkKeygens tend to make a lot of AVs go 'WOAH?!?!' :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanjoa Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 52% of positives not a virus? :angry: They are so many to be false. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 52% of positives not a virus? :angry: They are so many to be false.We've listed keygens on nsane which had 70% false positives, but yet they were in fact clean ;) I know it's hard to believe, but it's true :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marik Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 52% of positives not a virus? :angry: They are so many to be false.this just begs the question "why would we list infected keygens/cracks/patches"...where's the trust :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 52% of positives not a virus? :angry: They are so many to be false.this just begs the question "why would we list infected keygens/cracks/patches"...where's the trust :PDo note that this is a member posting one, not that you shouldn't trust our members, but it does make a difference ;) Anyhow I found two proper keygens; one by CORE and one by Lz0, the one from core got 50% hits and the one from Lz0 got 0%, so I uploaded that one :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ck_kent Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 Is there any way we can be sure if a keygen/file is just a false positive even if reports from virustotal says it's a virus/trojan? I have had several keygens which NOD32 detects as probably a variant... I run it anyway :lol: and just prepare for the consequences if it screws up my pc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marik Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 (edited) prob either sandboxie or threatexpert....if the kg tries to modify files like .dll's, then it's most likely a vrius Do note that this is a member posting one, not that you shouldn't trust our members, but it does make a difference ;)I said that because he was a member.....if it's a member, it should already be known that we don't host infected medicine, and that he can trust us (nsanedown) when it comes to a fix, regardless of the false positives of an antivirus due to a pissed off company who reported the keygen to be added to their av db in the first place Edited August 19, 2010 by Marik Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 prob either sandboxie or threatexpert....if the kg tries to modify files like .dll's, then it's most likely a vrius Do note that this is a member posting one, not that you shouldn't trust our members, but it does make a difference ;)I said that because he was a member.....if it's a member, it should already be known that we don't host infected medicine, and that he can trust us (nsanedown) when it comes to a fix, regardless of the false positives of an antivirus due to a pissed off company who reported the keygen to be added to their av db in the first placeI said that because the person who posted the keygen was a member, therefore not being 'us' (as in staff) and this does make a difference because anyone can register here and become a member. So fixes posted by members do not deserve as much 'trust' as fixes listed on our frontpage. So I'm not referring to the member posting that this makes a lot of AVs go 'AWOOOSH???' but to the fact that a member posted the keygen. ps most if not all of our members who have more than like x posts or so can be trusted as much as any of our staff members, but I'm just making clear there is a (small) difference :) pps don't worry, me and Marik always fight! :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marik Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 pps don't worry, me and Marik always fight! :Dthe only part I actually bothered to read Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanjoa Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 (edited) Just a suggestion, why not to add to CCleaner download page CCEnhancer ? It's an add on that add new "places" to be cleaned by CCleaner. And why not to create an Adobe Players post? Where you can include Flash Player as well as Shockwave. Edited August 25, 2010 by José Matías Lemos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marik Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 Just a suggestion, why not to add to CCleaner download page CCEnhancer ? It's an add on that add new "places" to be cleaned by CCleaner. that's actually being discussed. We were waiting on more opinions from the users. But I'll go ahead and add it as an addon to the entry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Lite Posted August 25, 2010 Administrator Share Posted August 25, 2010 Just a suggestion, why not to add to CCleaner download page CCEnhancer ? It's an add on that add new "places" to be cleaned by CCleaner. that's actually being discussed. We were waiting on more opinions from the users. But I'll go ahead and add it as an addon to the entryThe big problem with this tool is the amount of downtime the website suffers, hence the rulesets cannot be downloaded,making it useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muhib Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Wouldn't it be better if you post screenshots of the softwares that you upload on the front page? It would really help us a lot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Lite Posted September 8, 2010 Administrator Share Posted September 8, 2010 It has been considered before however we decided it would take considerable work, which at the time wasn't available. We will consider it again however ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Lite Posted September 8, 2010 Administrator Share Posted September 8, 2010 What do you mean "typing"? We are talking about screenshots :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanjoa Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 A new suggestion: Ashampoo Burning Studio Elements. Is faster than Ashampoo Burning Studio. It should be added to Ashampoo Burning Studio download page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jalaffa Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 A new suggestion: Ashampoo Burning Studio Elements. Is faster than Ashampoo Burning Studio. It should be added to Ashampoo Burning Studio download page.It seem to be a lite version of the original Ashampoo Burning Studio. Photo- and Videoslideshows and Autoplay Editor are not included. Will check it out... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Lite Posted September 10, 2010 Administrator Share Posted September 10, 2010 Such as?... :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanjoa Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 New suggestion :P : another addon to CCleaner download page, CCleaner autoupdater. This tool is fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nima Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 Hello all, I suggest to add this excellent software to frontpage, "Inkscape" is an Open Source vector graphics editor using the W3C standard Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) file format. More description from Softpedia: "Inkscape is an Open Source vector graphics editor, with capabilities similar to Illustrator, Freehand, CorelDraw, or Xara X using the W3C standard Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) file format. Inkscape is a vector graphics editor that use Scalable Vector Graphics file format. Supported SVG features include shapes, paths, text, markers, clones, alpha blending, transforms, gradients, patterns, and grouping. Inkscape also supports Creative Commons meta-data, node editing, layers, complex path operations, bitmap tracing, text-on-path, flowed text, direct XML editing, and more. It imports formats such as Postscript, EPS, JPEG, PNG, and TIFF and exports PNG as well as multiple vector-based formats. Inkscape's main goal is to create a powerful and convenient drawing tool fully compliant with XML, SVG, and CSS standards. We also aim to maintain a thriving user and developer community by using open, community-oriented development process, and by making sure Inkcape is easy to learn, to use, and to extend." Download Thanks, Nima Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 We will consider this suggestion ;)We already have GIMP and Paint.NET though, could you point out some features from Inkscape that are better than those from GIMP and Paint.NET? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Lite Posted September 18, 2010 Administrator Share Posted September 18, 2010 We will consider this suggestion ;) We already have GIMP and Paint.NET though, could you point out some features from Inkscape that are better than those from GIMP and Paint.NET? Inkscape is an Open Source vector graphics editor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nima Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 (edited) First of all, we should not find a way to "replace" softwares, we should add more softwares to our database, anyway, I agree with Lite, about your question, From Inkscape official site: "They're used for two very different things. Inkscape is used for creating vector drawings, such as laying out a poster or creating a fancy logo, whereas bitmap editors are for working on raster images, such as touching up a photograph. In many projects, you would need to use both Inkscape and a bitmap editor (such as GIMP), for example, to add bitmap effects to an image exported from Inkscape. However, currently bitmap editors are often used for common tasks they are not well equipped for, such as creating web page layouts, logos, or technical line art. In most cases, this is because users are not aware of the power (or even the existence) of the modern vector editors. Inkscape wants to amend this situation, and to raise a vector editor to the status of an essential desktop tool for everyone, rather than an exotic specialized tool that only professionals use." On my word: GIMP would be used to: Touch up photographs Make basic animated GIFs Image tweaks such as shadow, highlights, colour balance, levels etc. Create Logos/Advertisements and many other things More information: http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/minimalit/inkscape-and-the-gimp-16678 Inkscape would be used for: Rasterized printing for example, If you wanted to print a logo on a T-Shirt vector graphics are often used because vectors are not resolution dependent and therefore can be enlarged/shrunk without losing any quality, the main source is lossless. Thanks, Nima Edited September 18, 2010 by Nima Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 @Lite (who is trying to take the smart ass title away from me)I was asking for features that are better than those in Paint.NET and GIMP, not 'more features'. :D@NimaThe fact that I ask for features that are better doesn't mean that I'd like to see some other program removed in order for this to be added, it's just that if we already have two great applications then why ad a third if the two before that one are better ;)Apparently the authors say these applications are completely different things, so then I guess that's not a valid point anymore (what I just said). (I still think you can compare them to some extent, ah well.)I think we could add this tool, but we'll have to discuss it with the other staff :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.