jalaffa Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 <img src="http://www.nsanedown.com/images/logos/Diskeeper.png" class="logo" alt="Diskeeper" title="Diskeeper" />Diskeeper is leading the way in Windows system defragmentation technology. Diskeeper 2011 continues with the tradition of true "Set It and Forget It"® performance enhancement which is a hallmark of the Diskeeper name. Whether you've used Diskeeper before or not, you may already be familiar with some of its features, but Diskeeper 2011 adds refinements to these features, and a number of other core enhancements. New users will find Diskeeper to be easy to use, yet comprehensive in its capabilities. Experienced Diskeeper users will recognize familiar features, but see improvements in Diskeeper (and their system) performance. Diskeeper 2011 with IntelliWrite prevents up to 85% of fragmentation and makes every system faster and more efficient than ever before. With Diskeeper clean fragmentation-proof disks last longer, use less energy, require less cooling and zero administrative support.Thanks to <span style="color: red;">Freddyfre</span> for the update.<a href="http://www.nsanedown.com/?request=25690302" target="_blank">Download</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knightmare Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 64-bit patch seems to work for version 15.0.958.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KotaXor Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Thanks for the update.....will wait for the fix.( if any) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackerz14 Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 the patch is for build 956.. im waiting for the next patch, tnx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knightmare Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Looks legit to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gderf Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 The patches for build 956 work for this build. In fact, I have used the same patch for the last four builds and it works fine. No need to wait for an updated patch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted July 10, 2011 Administrator Share Posted July 10, 2011 The patches for build 956 work for this build. In fact, I have used the same patch for the last four builds and it works fine. No need to wait for an updated patch.The patch (possibly) has older files, totally not recommended on newer build (unless shajt confirms it). Only use the latest patch. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddyfre Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Changes in build 958? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thylacine Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Changes in build 958?Enhanced file exclusion capabilities of IntelliWrite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shajt Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 The patches for build 956 work for this build. In fact, I have used the same patch for the last four builds and it works fine. No need to wait for an updated patch.The patch (possibly) has older files, totally not recommended on newer build (unless shajt confirms it). Only use the latest patch. ;) Yes, that's right my friend , it contains older files. Always use patch for the build that you are using , I'll fix this new build shortly. To prevent confusion in the future, although I made it perfectly clear several times to use only the patch for the latest build , I'll make generic patcher in one of these days. That way you can use that generic patcher for every future build. Until then , just wait for the latest fix before you upgrade to the latest build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shajt Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Okay, I just took a look at this new version and the files needed to be patched are exactly the same as in the previous build.So, there is no need for me to re-package the whole patch just to change the build number in the patcher , you can use previous patch for build 956 without any problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HALiD Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Thanks for the info shajt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jofre Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knightmare Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Thanks shajt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jalaffa Posted July 10, 2011 Author Share Posted July 10, 2011 Added changelog for 14.0.958.0. Thanks thylacine Removed for build 956 remark for patches. Thanks shajt for updated info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete 12 Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Is there another link for the x64 pro-premier patch ?? Can not download this patch from the download-page!! THANKS!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gderf Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 "So, there is no need for me to re-package the whole patch just to change the build number in the patcher , you can use previous patch for build 956 without any problems."Is there an echo in here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shajt Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 "So, there is no need for me to re-package the whole patch just to change the build number in the patcher , you can use previous patch for build 956 without any problems." Is there an echo in here? I don't get it :unsure: What I meant was that when you run 956 patch you will see that it's for 956 , so the only change in new patch (for 958) would be to change that text (956 to 958) , and I don't think that's worth the trouble, okay ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gderf Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 The point was that I said a new patch was not needed because the old patch works fine, and I have always tried older patches instead of just waiting for new ones. So far this has worked for me.Numerous people, including yourself said this was not so. Then later on you said a new patch was not needed. That was an "echo" of what I said originally. Get it?Keep up the good work with this stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knightmare Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Congrats on being right? :huh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shajt Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Yeah I get that , but it was explained numerous times how this patch works ... but maybe you don't have permission to read Coders Corner..Guess I'll have to explain it one more time ... When you install Diskeeper , you'll see a lots of files in Diskeeper directory , in order to 'license it' , several DLL files needs to be patched.I patch those files and put them in a patcher which does the job for you (stops the service, replace original files with patched ones and starts the service again) , after that you're done, it's licensed.Now, when new version comes out, I check new files (those that require patching) with previous ones , and if there are changes (and so far there were always changes) , I make a new patch.In this version those files are the same as in previous version.So, I don't need to patch them again.Whatever the changes are in this new version , they are in other files.Yes, you can use older patcher and it will work , but Diskeeper will use files from previous version, so any changes that are made in that new version will be missed, cause you're using older versions of those files.Okay ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gderf Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 It's not about being right.It's about others insisting I was wrong without even trying what I said. Kudos to those who did try, succeeded, and said so. I wouldn't have posted what I did if I didn't verify it to be correct first.A suggestion to the site managers: Don't accept posts with links to a new version of software with links to an old version of its patch unless the poster has explicitly verified that the old patch works with the new software. This will eliminate threads like this from ever getting started.A suggestion for all who use Diskeeper and any/all patches for it:Add the below to your hosts file or block TCP port 443 traffic to the below host in your firewall. This application phones home to that site.127.0.0.1 esm.diskeeper.com # Diskeeper Activation Server Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shajt Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 No problem , we are all here to help each other.You did nothing wrong basically , you just didn't saw earlier explanations and thought that patcher for earlier version would work.And like I said , it will work but that's not 'it'.I'm not a lazy guy, it takes more time to explain all this than to patch it :)What I'm trying to say is that if there's a reason to make a new patch for this new 958 version, I would have done it already.To conclude, for this new 958 version you can run the patcher for 956 version and everything will be just fine.Anyhow, I'll try to make a simpler patch , and by simpler I mean generic one , which will patch those files 'on the fly' with every new version.I'm working on that, but the problem is that patterns are always different with every new version, so until I find a way to do it, I'll have to fix them manually and release the patch for every new version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gderf Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Please do make a generic patcher when feasible. The folks who have been attacking all of Vandyke's software (SecureFX, SecureCRT) did this long ago and it still works because Vandyke has decided not to defeat it. And yes, they are clearly aware of the patchers that continue to work against their products.Just a bit to you personally. This isn't going to turn into a dick size war. We're both above that.I can speak from personal experience with the Diskeeper people. Within two days of the passage and signing into law of "No Electronic Theft Act of 1997" I was approached indirectly by their lawyer Danny Chadwell who stated that he was going to take legal action against me for the "illegal distribution of his company's products and methods of circumventing licensing requirements of same." These people are relentless, and they could have concluded that legal action against me successfully if they really wanted to. Keep your head down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sophron Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Thank You shajt.!The best patches ever for the Diskeeper 2011. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.