Ambrocious Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toyo Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 “The EU has drawn up a “concept of operations” for the deployment of military forces in Libya, but needs UN approval for what would be the riskiest and most controversial mission undertaken by Brussels,” reports the Guardian. “The armed forces, numbering no more than 1,000, would be deployed to secure the delivery of aid supplies, would not be engaged in a combat role but would be authorised to fight if they or their humanitarian wards were threatened. “It would be to secure sea and land corridors inside the country,” said an EU official.Well, no "new" news here, everybody with a child's brain could tell you what's next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambrocious Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 "The EU has drawn up a "concept of operations" for the deployment of military forces in Libya, but needs UN approval for what would be the riskiest and most controversial mission undertaken by Brussels," reports the Guardian. "The armed forces, numbering no more than 1,000, would be deployed to secure the delivery of aid supplies, would not be engaged in a combat role but would be authorised to fight if they or their humanitarian wards were threatened. "It would be to secure sea and land corridors inside the country," said an EU official.Well, no "new" news here, everybody with a child's brain could tell you what's next.You'd be surprised how many people I talk to about this and they disagree that this is an invasion, they insist that it's kinetic military action, then I tell them it's the same thing, they just don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toyo Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 Ghaddafi could well suffer an "unfortunate event" :P before there's a need for a full-blown invasion, so meh, there's a possibility this ground invasion will never happen. As for the people that do not agree with you, Ambrocious, with all due respect, but it could be that Infowars signature. Alex Jones gets too emotional to be considered a good news provider. He's more like a commentator. It happens that I also agree with some of the stuff he says, but if he wants to be respected as an impartial news guy, he must provide more facts, less opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambrocious Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 I'd rather listen to an emotion filled guy yelling then listen to a very emotionless person reporting on atrocities as if it were a conversation about your breakfast cereal. I like getting all energized, put some meaning and feeling in the news, maybe that's just how I work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 The thing is that at some point this guy (Alex Jones) will tell you that your breakfast cereal is just a way for 'the globalists' to manipulate you into believing that you're not an alien, but you actually are, and they are watching you.Yes, Alex Jones does provide some facts, yes he is right about some things, but he loses all credibility when he starts to think that everything is strongly connected. The world banks do NOT control the UN, but of course they, as well as any other large economical entity, influence the UN. Same goes for all other organizations which he claims are a part of 'the new world odor' (smelly business...).Or the video in which he claimed the government was remotely erasing DVDs. Hilarious!Yes, there is a middle way between journalism as most of us know it and Alex Jones which is probably closer to the whole truth than either the 'traditional journalism' and Alex Jones. (Especially American journalism... The whole of which,I think, is comparable to SBS6 (a Dutch channel which has gossipy or 'un-educated' news) in the Netherlands.))Don't get me wrong, I'm not 'against' the 'news' he brings... It's just that I can't believe he's so full of... you know... and that he actually believes it himself (I really do no think he does (believe what he is saying himself) and that he is only in it for the sensation, which is why I do not have much respect for the guy). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myidisbb Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 The thing is that at some point this guy (Alex Jones) will tell you that your breakfast cereal is just a way for 'the globalists' to manipulate you into believing that you're not an alien, but you actually are, and they are watching you.Yes, Alex Jones does provide some facts, yes he is right about some things, but he loses all credibility when he starts to think that everything is strongly connected. The world banks do NOT control the UN, but of course they, as well as any other large economical entity, influence the UN. Same goes for all other organizations which he claims are a part of 'the new world odor' (smelly business...).Or the video in which he claimed the government was remotely erasing DVDs. Hilarious!Yes, there is a middle way between journalism as most of us know it and Alex Jones which is probably closer to the whole truth than either the 'traditional journalism' and Alex Jones. (Especially American journalism... The whole of which,I think, is comparable to SBS6 (a Dutch channel which has gossipy or 'un-educated' news) in the Netherlands.))Don't get me wrong, I'm not 'against' the 'news' he brings... It's just that I can't believe he's so full of... you know... and that he actually believes it himself (I really do no think he does (believe what he is saying himself) and that he is only in it for the sensation, which is why I do not have much respect for the guy).agree i basically ignore him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.