nsane Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 yeah, i've been doing a bit of tweaking to the engine for the frontpage. i was wondering what kind of load time you guys get for these 3 pages...1. PAGE 12. PAGE 23. PAGE 3you can tell how long page loads take by the 'execution time' at the very bottom of the page. please let me know, it should only take a whole 2 minutes out of your life ;)thanks in advance ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudeboy2025 Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 Page 1 - 2.0441799Page 2 - 0.7864552Page 3 - 0.8659489 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preso Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 Page 1 - 0.5661702Page 2 - 0.0009069Page 3 - 0.2375771 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsane Posted July 1, 2005 Author Share Posted July 1, 2005 thanks, lookin good so far. that would make my average load time ~1 second...which is damn good ;)some more stats would be helpful tho :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erRor67 Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 0.4207020.0107820.283427 :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samurai Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 Page 1: 0.6823919Page 2: 0.000953Page 3: 0.3950291I am sharing my line tho, but the other person is just browsing so shouldn't cause that much of a difference :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsane Posted July 1, 2005 Author Share Posted July 1, 2005 lookin great now, just compare my times to FSP...Very Slow (83% of sites are faster), Avg Load Time: 3.8 Secondsmy average is now :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tensegg Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 page 1 - 0.229203page 2 - 0.0013299page 3 - 0.166028been getting loads of server busy errors this past couple of days though ;)EDIT: those times are thru privoxy too, pretty fast methinks :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D0GG Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 0.63486390.0072520.3043551 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsane Posted July 1, 2005 Author Share Posted July 1, 2005 moved to feedback forum in hopes of more responses :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 Page 1: 0.4417441Page 2: 0.0192769Page 3: 0.3092899 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeus_Hunt Posted July 2, 2005 Share Posted July 2, 2005 Page 1: 0.3437221Page 2: 0.0694749Page 3: 0.4072295 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Lite Posted July 2, 2005 Administrator Share Posted July 2, 2005 lookin great now, just compare my times to FSP...Very Slow (83% of sites are faster), Avg Load Time: 3.8 Secondsmy average is now :huh:Why oh why do you beleive what you find on alexa? :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsane Posted July 2, 2005 Author Share Posted July 2, 2005 uhm, it's a statistic and better than nothing? :huh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Posted July 2, 2005 Share Posted July 2, 2005 Sites look great nsane. Keep it up..load times aren't a problem. Although i received a "server too busy" message for the forums. Do you actually need to put a server load limit on the forums? :huh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsane Posted July 2, 2005 Author Share Posted July 2, 2005 yeah, if the CPU usage goes over 10.0 the forum goes offline. the frontpage however, is limited by phpadmin...so it shouldn't have as much of a problem (it is still limited however) :huh:i've contacted the host about the issue, who stated they had a few site(s) that were draining resources (poor coding). they have contacted the owners and requested they move to a better hosting account/server. so, it should hopefully be solved shortly :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Posted July 2, 2005 Share Posted July 2, 2005 Alright, good. How much do you pay for your hosting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preso Posted July 2, 2005 Share Posted July 2, 2005 Something that ain't discuss in the forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsane Posted July 2, 2005 Author Share Posted July 2, 2005 not much, ~$10/mo for this host. but, the site doesn't require the bandwidth and space of the file servers...it has plenty tho :rolleyes:the host said they're planning on buying a better, 2x 3GHz Opteron, server at which i'd be moved too. so we shouldn't have a prob for much longer :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preso Posted July 2, 2005 Share Posted July 2, 2005 not much, ~$10/mo for this host. but, the site doesn't require the bandwidth and space of the file servers...it has plenty tho :)the host said they're planning on buying a better, 2x 3GHz Opteron.....so we shouldn't have a prob for much longer ;)just got the problem for the very first time :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsane Posted July 2, 2005 Author Share Posted July 2, 2005 yeah, it's another site on the server. either they have a poorly coded site or they're running a really intensive cron multiple times a day. the host wouldn't tell me exactly what was causing it, but they were hinting at something along those lines :rolleyes:CPU usage seems to be normalized now (0.34) :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Posted July 3, 2005 Share Posted July 3, 2005 Is 92Hosting your host? Do they allow hashlinks to be hosted on their servers? Interested. :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Lite Posted July 3, 2005 Administrator Share Posted July 3, 2005 The forum is not hosted by 92hosting :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SliverSamuel Posted July 5, 2005 Share Posted July 5, 2005 1. PAGE 1 0.57215882. PAGE 2 0.0010753. PAGE 3 0.0756612 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Posted July 5, 2005 Share Posted July 5, 2005 The forum is not hosted by 92hosting :DBut the front page is? I'm guessing they have a policy against warez then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.