Paying Users To Report Fake Torrents is Illegal, Anti-Piracy Outfit Claims

[nsane.forums]

Founded a few months ago, TorLock is a relatively unknown name to most BitTorrent users. Nonetheless, the site has already captured the attention of various anti-piracy outfits.

In common with most torrent indexers and search engines, TorLock is committed to ensure that DMCA takedown requests from copyright holders are handled properly, but there’s one outfit for which this is not enough.

TorLock advertises itself as the “no fakes torrent site” and claims that it is nearly impossible to find a fake file among the 140,738 torrents that the site currently hosts. To illustrate the confidence the site owner has in TorLock’s “VeriPLUS” system, he has an open offer to pay $1 for every fake torrent users are able to find.

“Simply take the url of the fake torrent and paste it into the message box, remember to give a valid email where we can get in contact with you to discuss the torrent in question and arrange payment,” says a statement on the site. TorLock’s owner Jack told TorrentFreak that this offer still stands. “I’m sure that we are one of the biggest verified sources in the torrent world right now,” he said.

The offer is an interesting gesture, and it’s good to see efforts being taken by site owners to prevent spam and fakes from flooding indexers. However, the $1 per fake torrent offer is not liked by everyone, the Indian anti-piracy outfit Aiplex in particular. Yes, the same Aiplex that admitted to DDoSing torrent sites, to conspiring with the Government and signing contracts worth thousands of dollars to protect Bollywood films.

Aiplex claims the offer is highly illegal, which it pointed out in an email to the TorLock owner.

As always, the correspondance from Aiplex is not the most outstanding literary work, and even plain incomprehensible here and there, but the core message is clear. As can be read below, Aiplex believes that offering users money for their fake torrent reports is highly illegal. The reason they give is an odd one though, to say the least.

We have seen u advertise in ur site that you give $1 for fake. We trust this is highly illegal and we will fight to protect our clients rights. You cannot pay people for other’s material, you do not own the rights. We have already ban ur site. Now we will come after u and the people who host ur illegal website… The Indian Govt wont take this and will suport us in the battle against ur and other sites. Other people dont pay users for helping piracy. U will get in trouble for this… u do not understand who u are dealing with. We demand u remove the offer and also adhere to the many requests we have sent u to delete illegal files… We will not ask again…

Aiplex seems to argue that TorLock’s owner can’t pay users for reporting fake files, because he doesn’t own the rights to these fake torrents. This makes no sense, right? If we follow this logic it would be illegal for TorLock’s owner to take down torrent files following a DMCA complaint as well.

We’ve read this and the rest of the email Aiplex sent a few times now but we have really no idea what it means. The only thing that’s clear to us is that TorLock’s owner Jack appears to be in serious trouble and Aiplex and the Indian Government have allegedly set the wheels in motion for a site-ban.

Too bad, TorLock seemed to be a promising site.

Article from: TorrentFreak, Covering Torrent Sites and News since 2005.

View: Original Article

[toyo]

Someone should be sent back to some elementary English classes... Is this really possible? Who are these Aiplex and are they really employed by the Indian Government?

[DKT27]

I believe they are connected with the film industry, and the film industry with the state ministers. To be honest, I'm sure the Govt. will never ever use this type of thugs with no sense of proper english to decrease piracy. In fact, Govt. is trying to stop piracy that's happening on the roads more than on internet. Not to forget, it's also trying to cut the prices of original media so that the common man can afford it. This Aiplex is certainly in connection with the dark side of the force, if it is.

Really, I'm so frustrated by AiPlex that I can shoot a email directly to the Priministorial Office to look into the matters of this org threatening the internet without any proof or lawful rights with the non proven (if not false) grant from the Govt.

[kmr1684]

I believe they are connected with the film industry, and the film industry with the state ministers. To be honest, I'm sure the Govt. will never ever use this type of thugs with no sense of proper english to decrease piracy. In fact, Govt. is trying to stop piracy that's happening on the roads more than on internet. Not to forget, it's also trying to cut the prices of original media so that the common man can afford it. This Aiplex is certainly in connection with the dark side of the force, if it is.

Really, I'm so frustrated by AiPlex that I can shoot a email directly to the Priministorial Office to look into the matters of this org threatening the internet without any proof or lawful rights with the non proven (if not false) grant from the Govt.

dude you and me already know when you talk to and about indian govermnet you must back up by big pool of money buddy because everything logically correct (if it is against the land of the law) if you have big suitcase of money. :o

ps: in india meaning of goverment is literally and by dictionary g©over+ment. cover full of money running it. :lol:

[irefay]

"He doesn’t own the rights to these fake torrents. This makes no sense, right? If we follow this logic it would be illegal for TorLock’s owner to take down torrent files following a DMCA complaint as well."

Exactly. Some 15 yr old punk trying to make a name for himself. Having no real skills, he turned to "fighting" piracy.

[Sl@pSh0ck™]

Aiplex again? Haven't they gotten enough packets already? :lmao: