Jump to content

Mozilla Firefox 4.0 Beta 9


Bizarre™

Recommended Posts

<img src="http://www.nsanedown.com//images/logos/Firefox-orig.png" class="logo" alt="Firefox" title="Firefox" />Firefox is the award winning next generation browser from Mozilla. Firefox empowers you to browse faster, more safely, and more efficiently than with any other browser. Make the switch today - Firefox imports your Favorites, settings and other information, so you have nothing to lose. Stop annoying popup ads in their tracks with Firefox's built in popup blocker. View more than one web page in a single window with this time saving feature. Open links in the background so that they're ready for viewing when you're ready to read them. Built with your security in mind, Firefox keeps your computer safe from malicious spyware by not loading harmful ActiveX controls. A comprehensive set of privacy tools keep your online activity your business.

<a href="http://www.nsanedown.com/?request=230571" target="_blank">Download</a>

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 25
  • Views 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

i am the first comment

:party::party::party:

thanks for the update, will wait for the final :)

benchmark please :notworthy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Nice. Will benchmark soon. :) Be aware though, more speed isn't expected, this is more like a version aimed at the gui etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Nice. Will benchmark soon. :) Be aware though, more speed isn't expected, this is more like a version aimed at the gui etc.

For me its faster than beta8 and others reported same :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Much better than beta 8 more faster than beta 8.

Much better add ons page and new progressbar while downloading addons

Link to comment
Share on other sites


memory usage?

i dont know if it's just me

but i'm using it for about two hours (keeping it opened )

i watched some flash videos on nba.com

and i dont see it as memory hog as it was with the previous releases.

using it with 12 tabs , process lasso tells firefox uses 10% of cpu , memory around 200Mb .

i think they are doing a good job in this beta

not to mention html5test showed the same exact points 207 as beta 8 (chrome scored about 244)

Good job Mozilla

Link to comment
Share on other sites


memory usage?

--------------------------------------------------------

125 MB, I guess !

memory usage?

i dont know if it's just me

but i'm using it for about two hours (keeping it opened )

i watched some flash videos on nba.com

and i dont see it as memory hog as it was with the previous releases.

using it with 12 tabs , process lasso tells firefox uses 10% of cpu , memory around 200Mb .

i think they are doing a good job in this beta

not to mention html5test showed the same exact points 207 as beta 8 (chrome scored about 244)

Good job Mozilla

thanks guys ... sounds good .. will give this a run after work :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This beta feels indeed faster. Previous was somehow sluggish. There is even slight improvements in benchmark. But they still didn't fix the damn font with Direct 2D enabled! :angry:

Benchmark attached.

Cheers ;)

post-10441-0-36106200-1295038375_thumb.p

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

It performed bad (even this time). I believe it's my CPU which starts to throttle because of heat, that's why it's scoring less in mine. Here's the benchmark:

8FOa1.png

Please note that I wont benchmark the RC. There's still Beta 10 to release though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well, first time I also got lower score, and second time I got it as you see it. It's interesting to see that Opera is top in your benchmark, where Chrome is on mine. And why wouldn't you benchmark RC?

Cheers ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

I tested it two times, and on the third time, it was too sluggish to let complete. Blame my CPU's heat.

About RC, well, I feel I shouldn't test RC, I believe RC will overwrite the Firefox installation, and I don't want to use it until it's officially final. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just change installation folder, and it won't overwrite, since it's different version number. What's up with the heat? Fan broken on CPU?

Cheers ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Somehow I feel I shouldn't test RC. Let my excitement rise a little. :D

About fan, well nothing much, by heatsink paste has dried and the Intel fan is not so great to handle my needs, that's why waiting for my engineer about what happened to the Cooler Master Cooler I had asked him to inquire about. More info here. :)

BTW, have you installed this update to solve the blur fonts problem? I read some of the MozDev saying that this is a problem from M$ side. :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Some times.. in a normal setup.. Cool air in to fan ...blowing and channeled into..( usually with plastic tunnel or guard ) then cpu fan to pushing hot air out ( away from ) and circulating cool air on radiator.. The fan on top of the CPU can be turned around backward... and mounted either way.. It doesn't seem to make sense ( to most ) as to why it would be mounted the right way.. so many mount it backward blowing air into.. forces ( through Kinetics.. warmer temps into the board surrounding the chip and is actually hotter and less stable than it should be.. I dropped the temps on my mom and dads system quite a bit and it maintained those temperatures more readily after flipping it over.. I tested it both ways to be sure.. and depending on how you have it setup..it may work for a better point of stability.. the other way.. this is on a HP box.. old one..

Sort of a hard one to explain.. the tunnel and rate of force ( plus size of fan ) blowing onto the board.. then the small fan blows away or into the airflow.. because of the way it is setup .. the smaller fan pulls cooler air into the side of the radiator and circulates cooler air while the heat it being pulled out and away from everything.. Other cool air on the sides actually works to cool the board.. instead of warmer air..Then I found there PSU fan had stopped.. casing weird reboots.. oiled the fan got it to work and found that the vent holes which allow any other heat to escape from the box were covered .. pointed them down to allow it to escape and now it doesn't climb above 23 C ( 73 F )and about 40 - 46 C for the hard drive.. but its stable without huge climbs and such.. ( those numbers I just took from it.. but I watched it originally for about a week ) Before the temps would spike dramatically... and the PSU would get too hot as well..

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Some times.. in a normal setup.. Cool air in to fan ...blowing and channeled into..( usually with plastic tunnel or guard ) then cpu fan to pushing hot air out ( away from ) and circulating cool air on radiator.. The fan on top of the CPU can be turned around backward... and mounted either way.. It doesn't seem to make sense ( to most ) as to why it would be mounted the right way.. so many mount it backward blowing air into.. forces ( through Kinetics.. warmer temps into the board surrounding the chip and is actually hotter and less stable than it should be.. I dropped the temps on my mom and dads system quite a bit and it maintained those temperatures more readily after flipping it over.. I tested it both ways to be sure.. and depending on how you have it setup..it may work for a better point of stability.. the other way.. this is on a HP box.. old one..

Sort of a hard one to explain.. the tunnel and rate of force ( plus size of fan ) blowing onto the board.. then the small fan blows away or into the airflow.. because of the way it is setup .. the smaller fan pulls cooler air into the side of the radiator and circulates cooler air while the heat it being pulled out and away from everything.. Other cool air on the sides actually works to cool the board.. instead of warmer air..Then I found there PSU fan had stopped.. casing weird reboots.. oiled the fan got it to work and found that the vent holes which allow any other heat to escape from the box were covered .. pointed them down to allow it to escape and now it doesn't climb above 23 C ( 73 F )and about 40 - 46 C for the hard drive.. but its stable without huge climbs and such.. ( those numbers I just took from it.. but I watched it originally for about a week ) Before the temps would spike dramatically... and the PSU would get too hot as well..

I see. Well my base temp in BIOS is 69C (with heatsink dry of course). And I may or may not do any overclocking in future. So this cooler method seems to me as the cheap and suitable method to me. Now just pray my engineer says that model is available. :beg:

Well, we are going off topic. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yes, I have that update, I got it via Windows Update.

About fan: Your paste is bad. But maybe not all Intel fans and sinks are good. I had similar issue when I had some 1-core CPU, but on the current processor I have really great fan and sink which is Intel stock. As you can see in my signature, I overclocked my CPU to 2.6, and I when I stress-tested it I couldn't get it over 60 C, so I got feeling that I can overclock even more.

Cheers ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...