SliverSamuel Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 Processors are typically compared by their performance alone, but the folks at The Tech Report have put together an extensive comparative article that ranks 16 AMD and Intel chips based on how much bang they offer for your buck. The results may surprise you.Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeus_Hunt Posted June 30, 2007 Share Posted June 30, 2007 I happy to see my proc as the best value for money proc... Yes, I have a AMD X2 3600+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SliverSamuel Posted July 1, 2007 Author Share Posted July 1, 2007 same here :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eBait Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 3800+ here, but not the Dual Core version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeus_Hunt Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 I am finding Dual Core quite handy.. as I feel the 2nd core is making me believe that the system is much more responsive when I work with 2-3 application wen compared to my previous AMD Athlon 3000+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SliverSamuel Posted July 3, 2007 Author Share Posted July 3, 2007 be it a illusion or not, dual core still sounds nice :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toyo Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 i have a sempron 2400+ :why: but soon i will change all of my system. it seemed so enough 1 yr ago, but since CS3 is in my system... it is sooooo slow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dock98 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 i paid about 230. us for an intel 3.4 express,speed 3390 .it seems the dual[core is in name only.i am wainting for the next breakthroough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.