Hackers 'hit Mastercard payments', attack Visa

[Atasas]

A wise man said this:

It's just a coincidence that the day after the US declared war on him,  this charge was made.  Also a coincidence that in the couple of weeks  since then, Amazon and other servers dumped Wikileaks, PayPal dumped it,  a few countries banned it, and American politicians made threats  against the NY Times for espionage.                        

And this is what we know about the so called rape victim:

"Sarah" was already a well-known 'radical feminist'. In her 30s, she had  travelled the world following various fashionable causes. While a  research assistant at a local university she had not only been the  protegee of a militant feminist *academic, but held the post of 'campus  sexual equity officer'. Fighting male discrimination in all forms,  including sexual harassment, was her forte...

...How must "Sarah" have felt to *discover that the man she'd taken to  her bed three days before had already taken up with another woman?  *Furious? Jealous? Out for revenge?...

...Earlier this year, "Sarah" is reported to have posted a telling entry  on her website, which she has since removed. But a copy has been  retrieved and widely circulated on the internet. Entitled '7 Steps to  Legal Revenge', it explains how women can use courts to get their own  back on unfaithful lovers. Step 7 says: 'Go to it and keep your goal in  sight. Make sure your victim suffers just as you did.' (The highlighting  of text is "Sarah's" own.)                     

If you read the charges about why he was charged you would know that the charge does not hold up in USA but in Sweden. Not wearing a condom during consensual sex is NOT illegal in USA or most other countries, in fact the one and only case I know about is Sweden apparently. The woman he chose to have sex with is just a vindictive feminist who will look for any means possible to get revenge on her ex lovers. If anything she should be charged and sent to an asylum. Your definition of rapist is exceedingly skewed as a backer of USA, I must say.

The way Americans govern is through massive secrecy and hiding everything from the citizenry, so maybe it seems like the normal thing to do, why blame others for exposing their secrets? Count how many separate agencies there are in USA alone for the sole purpose of covering up secrets and intelligence gathering for domestic threats. Nothing they leak is unintentional, its all an illusion and trickery to force some new invasive law upon American citizens. Just like how they fooled everyone into thinking the patriot act was necessary, and Presidential control of the Internet.

Your opinion on the matter is duly noted though and I accept what you say.

just to say- u know what u said...

[shajt]

This whole BS is CIA operation , it's just beta-testing.