nsane.forums Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Chipsets promise speed and performance boosts AMD has added to its 8-Series range with six new chipsets, including three Phenom and three Athlon processors. The firm said that the processors improve the visual experience on PCs, while lowering power consumption. The Phenom II X6 1075, previously codenamed Thuban, includes high-end Turbo CORE acceleration technology for fine tuning, as well as six-core performance, and costs less than £160. The Phenom II X2 560 Black Edition is again pitched as an affordable alternative, offering strong performance with low power consumption and performance tuning options for "enthusiasts". The three 45nm Phenoms include six-, four- and two-core versions and range between £80 and £200, while the Athlons come in four-, three- and two-core versions and all cost under £100. AMD said that the releases form part of its Vision Technology which promises to offer a smooth visual experiences. View: Original Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mara- Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 AMD is far better than IntelIn your dreams. :lol:Cheers ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tunerz Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 AMD is far better than IntelIn price per performance, typically yes. Otherwise, no by a long shot.V LOL TrollolololReal world performance speaks for itself buddy. Cut your reality distortion field and acknowledge Intel regained the crown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioActive Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 AMD is far better than IntelWrong.In your dreams. :lol:Cheers ;)Also wrong.Otherwise, no by a long shot.Still wrong.The correct response would be something like this: "You can NOT compare entire brand names against each other and simply state which is better or worse, you have to be (very) specific about you want to compare to avoid misleading conclusions. Each brand has its own product lines and each has its pros and cons. Intel excels in producing high-end products which deliver superior performance usually at an expensive overall cost (if not overpriced at times) while AMD is most known for its low-end to medium-high products which deliver excellent performance considering the price (i.e. biggest-bang-for-the-buck) .In the end it all comes down to your preference, needs, and most importantly your budget!Now, back to the original topic; I seen some benchmarks for AMD Phenom II X6 1055T and 1090T and I have to say that I'm impressed. Check this review for detailed benchmarks if you're curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Lohengrin is right, the clock rates can't even be compared between AMD and Intel. (2,5 Ghz AMD is not equal to 2,5Ghz Intel)Generally speaking AMDs are better for budget PCs and Intels are better for high(er) end systems (price/performance wise).The above doesn't seem to work out for laptops though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drolz Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 low power consumption? maybe but with 6-8 cores, this is still higher than the lower series Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioActive Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Cyrix <nuff said> is the number 1 processor :lol:I'm sorry to inform you that Cryix is deceased! "He" died in November 11, 1997. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.