anemones2 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 What is actually wrong with comodo av?Everyone is all eset32... Comodo doesn't seem to hog cpu at all. Does eset32 run even lighter?but on another topic, which are the general differences between superantispywarefree . portable . and the full sheeemoozeeleeei want something good but nonetheless, the lightest version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Owl Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 The results from Anti-Virus Comparatives are regularly posted here. Check them out.Comodo's reputation here is that it's an excellent firewall, but a so-so or bad antivirus program. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atasas Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 ......................................................................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anemones2 Posted August 24, 2010 Author Share Posted August 24, 2010 Thanks night owl. Although neither queries were really addressed but oh well :PI'm just wondering if there are many differences between those spy ware versions.and also comodo av seems more than ok for freeware >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*dcs18 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Good-bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anemones2 Posted August 25, 2010 Author Share Posted August 25, 2010 i want something good but nonetheless, the lightest version.The lightest anti-virus program is ESET NOD32 2.70.39 - just finished testing the latest 4.2.64.12 and am back to 2.70.39. ;)Is that the Portable version, or? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
implague Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 No 2.70.39 is not a portable its just a older version of eset AV but i hav some doubts about the scanning engine :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*dcs18 Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 Good-bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
implague Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 yeah come to know after the famous EICAR test older version aint detect but the ver.4 cleans it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anemones2 Posted August 26, 2010 Author Share Posted August 26, 2010 One would expect a newer version to catch more stuff, that's their whole business! heheupdating signatures and the scanning program. (and when they run out of 'catching stuff' tweaks, they just focus on a new layout so it looks newer, or more current.)speed can be lost in the process. but yeah, super anti spy-ware portable seems good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.