Administrator DKT27 Posted March 31, 2010 Administrator Share Posted March 31, 2010 Competition among browser makers is getting fiercer, and Mozilla programmers are pushing a schedule in one hotly contested area, hardware-accelerated graphics. On Windows, this takes the form of support for Direct2D and DirectWrite, technology to tap into the graphics processing unit (GPU) to process and display graphics and text faster. Direct2D support is one of the highlight features of the upcoming Internet Explorer 9, but Firefox programmers are working on it, too. And now the Mozilla graphics team have issued themselves a goal, according to a mailing list message: ship a developer preview version of Firefox with Direct2D support that will work on at least some machines by the end of the second quarter. The feature should improve how fast Firefox responds to user interaction, said programmer Joe Drew in the message. However, the goal worried Benjamin Smedberg, a Mozilla programmer who's working on the Electrolysis effort to split Firefox processes into separate memory spaces. "The current release roadmap, as I understand it, is to do a beta of 1.9.3 in mid-June with a scheduled release in October," Smedberg responded. "By targeting an alpha for these goals you're implicitly missing this release vehicle." Other goals for the second quarter include: • Shipping a final version of Firefox for Windows with the out-of-process plugins feature that's designed to improve stability by putting Flash Player and other plug-ins in a separate memory area. Out-of-process plug-ins are one aspect of Electrolysis. • Shipping a beta version of Firefox with out-of-process Flash support for Macs using Snow Leopard, aka Mac OS X 10.6. • Building support for the JaegerMonkey technology for faster JavaScript performance to the point where its performance can be tested, and supporting the EcmaScript 5 version of the standard that underlies JavaScript. • Releasing an alpha version of Firefox with support for the Indexed DB local storage database technology. • Turning on the HTML5 parser by default in a beta version, a move that will mean Firefox can decode Web pages written with the new Web page standard under development. Source: CNET Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Looking forward to the new JS engine and HTML5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oZ. Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Looking forward to the new JS engine and HTML5.oh ya, same !!!!!!&New Look =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Owl Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 It will be great to see the performance improvements come to Firefox. Every browser (except for Internet Explorer :lol: ) is beating Firefox in performance tests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*dcs18 Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Sounds good, hope they're able to deploy it in the upcoming 4 series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 It will be great to see the performance improvements come to Firefox. Every browser (except for Internet Explorer :lol: ) is beating Firefox in performance tests.Not true, it's mainly Firefox's JS engine screwing up...In other tests they're still amongst the fastest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*dcs18 Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 My config of Firefox is able to beat every other browser in all respects, except in the startup department. B)Without addons, though it's a different story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Owl Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 It will be great to see the performance improvements come to Firefox. Every browser (except for Internet Explorer :lol: ) is beating Firefox in performance tests.Not true, it's mainly Firefox's JS engine screwing up...In other tests they're still amongst the fastest.As majithia23 recently posted here, other browsers beat Firefox in:Startup time - single tabStartup time - 5 tabsStartup time - 8 tabsMemory usage - single tabPage load time - craigslistPage load time - FacebookPage load time - Yahoo!Page load time - YoutubeNonTroppo Page LoadingGUIMark HTMLNonTroppo CSS RenderingNonTroppo Table RenderingGoogle V8 Benchmark SuiteJSBenchmark (CelticKane)Mozilla Dromaeo Javascript TestSunSpider JavaScript BenchmarkFuturemark PeaceKeeperAcid3Mozilla Dromaeo DOMGUIMark FlashGUIMark JavaFirefox won inMemory Usage - 5 tabsMemory Usage - 10 tabsPage load time - Tom's HardwareBubblemark SilverLightThe Analysis and Conclusion section summarized Firefox's performance:I already knew that Firefox was beginning to feel slow, but I didn't know how bad it had become. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*dcs18 Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 He's conducted the test without addons.Check this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 I did actually read that article but the 'places' are a little misguiding. Since when you have a look at the actual tests results (in ms) you will get a better view of things.Yes, Firefox might be 3rd and 4th a lot, but it got fourth by minuscule increments, so even though it's not the fastest, it was damn close. The only tests in which Firefox really failed (and we all expected that, I think) were the Javascript benchmarks.Edit: and it failed in the NonTroppo tests, which does kind of surprise me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreamHaters Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 They need to fix the JS and do something about the memory leak.Speed wise, i dont think there never slowed down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 Memory leak, which? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreamHaters Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 When Firefox doesnt release memory that it is no longer using.Like i could be on multiple social sites and say it be at 200mb+ and then if im jus using google, it would just stay at 200mb for a while, unless Firefox was closed and started up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 When Firefox doesnt release memory that it is no longer using.Like i could be on multiple social sites and say it be at 200mb+ and then if im jus using google, it would just stay at 200mb for a while, unless Firefox was closed and started up.Ah, I see, I've experienced that.I thought you were maybe referring to the one-tab test in which Firefox comes fourth or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizarre™ Posted March 31, 2010 Share Posted March 31, 2010 @DreamHaters:Indeed I agree. Mozilla has to fix memory issues.They haven't paid attention about this for ages now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.