Jump to content

Coronavirus was in Europe and Brazil already in 2019


Radpop

Recommended Posts

Coronavirus was in Europe and Brazil already in 2019

 

Many researchers from different countries have found coronavirus from several frozen wastewater samples from 2019. Spanish virologists have found traces of the novel coronavirus in a sample of Barcelona waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the COVID-19 disease was identified in China. Italy sewage study suggests COVID-19 was in Milan and Turin in December 2019. Brazil finds coronavirus in sewage sample from November 27, 2019.

 

Source

 

More sources:

Reuters

Globalnews

Euronews

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.26.20140731v1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 9
  • Views 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

One more info about the virus outside of China before its official discovery in China.

However, the COVID-19 disease is about infection of people, not just about samples/traces in sewage/wastewater. IMHO, a stronger point would be an early patient infected by the virus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Source 

 

https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-06-28/Spanish-study-finds-coronavirus-traces-in-March-2019-sewage-sample-RGOr98Afcs/index.html

CGTN = CGTN.com is the official website for China Global Television Network

 

Looks to me like Chinese propaganda trying to 'bat-away' your thoughts that Cov-19 started in Wuhan, China :rolleyes:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote

Chinese propaganda

 

A bit of https://www.cgtn.com/about-us

My New Year |2018 
Silver winner in the Social Issues category, U.S. International Film & Video Festival.

No Child Left Behind |2018 
Gold Camera Award winner for Best Documentary Short, U.S. International Film & Video Festival.

Charlottesville Violence|2018 
First place award winner for editing, White House News Photographers Association.

Detroit Hosts Alibaba's Gateway '17 |2018 
First place award winner for editing, White House News Photographers Association.

Louisiana's Isle de Jean Charles In Peril From Climate Change |2018 
Second place award winner for photography, White House News Photographers Association.

Faces Of Africa |2018 
Silver Winner for Documentary Series, Telly Awards, USA.

Surfers Not Street Children |2018 
Best Documentary award winner, Cannes Short Film Festival.

Ip Man's Last Student: The Tale of 'Wing Tsun King' |2018 
Golden Prize winner in the Short Video category, Global Trend Video Awards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Source links added. These findings originate from scientific studies.

 

11 hours ago, mp68terr said:

IMHO, a stronger point would be an early patient infected by the virus.

 

So, COVID-19 was in Spain 2019, should they open old people's graves to find corona?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thanks for the added links, mostly for the scientific paper from medrxiv (late June 2020). Original publications have more credit than after passing as news articles.

As written there and noted earlier, monitoring the wastewater/sewage can be an early way to detect infections. IMHO it is however not a proof that humans were infected and died of the severe acute respiratory syndrome.

No idea regarding how long the virus can survive in dead bodies. Finding patients whose death was caused by the virus would be a proof. Opening graves is done in some forensic studies as the last option to get samples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's quite normal that oldie dies in pneumonia followed seasonal influenza. For example, in Sweden people died in corona flu have been on average 84 years old. If there isn't any abnormal influenza situation like pandemic without vaccine to risky groups, exact cause of death could have been remained unclear at early stages of corona. Still sick people have secreted virus to sewage and it can be explored later from frozen sewage sample if there is test to identify virus.

 

About sources: Primary sources of this topic are being prepared for publication. Most sources on this forum are secondary sources at best. It's very rare that secondary source like newspaper article is totally correct. Journalists have time tables and they have mostly insufficient knowledge to do conclusions they will do. Every researcher knows this. Mostly, they haven't enough time or patience to lead the blind.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You mean that the 'normal' 'influenza' effects could have masked the early corona infection itself. Completely possible.

 

About sources: completely agree with you. It takes longer and much more effort to read/analyse/understand primary sources like scientific publications but at least readers with enough knowledge could make their own judgement from the presented data. The pre-eated secondary sources are easier to read but usually very superficial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...