One of Darwin's evolution theories finally proved by Cambridge researcher

[flash13]

One of Darwin's evolution theories finally proved by Cambridge researcher

 

 

Scientists have proved one of Charles Darwin's theories of evolution for the first time—nearly 140 years after his death.

Laura van Holstein, a Ph.D. student in Biological Anthropology at St John's College, University of Cambridge, and lead author of the research published today (March 18) in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, discovered mammal subspecies play a more important role in evolution than previously thought.

Her research could now be used to predict which species conservationists should focus on protecting to stop them becoming endangered or extinct.

A species is a group of animals that can interbreed freely amongst themselves. Some species contain subspecies—populations within a species that differ from each other by having different physical traits and their own breeding ranges. Northern giraffes have three subspecies that usually live in different locations to each other and red foxes have the most subspecies—45 known varieties—spread all over the world. Humans have no subspecies.

van Holstein said: "We are standing on the shoulders of giants. In Chapter 3 of On the Origin of Species Darwin said animal lineages with more species should also contain more 'varieties'. Subspecies is the modern definition. My research investigating the relationship between species and the variety of subspecies proves that sub-species play a critical role in long-term evolutionary dynamics and in future evolution of species. And they always have, which is what Darwin suspected when he was defining what a species actually was."

 

The anthropologist confirmed Darwin's hypothesis by looking at data gathered by naturalists over hundreds of years ¬- long before Darwin famously visited the Galapagos Islands on-board HMS Beagle. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, was first published in 1859 after Darwin returned home from a five-year voyage of discovery. In the seminal book, Darwin argued that organisms gradually evolved through a process called 'natural selection' - often known as survival of the fittest. His pioneering work was considered highly controversial because it contradicted the Bible's account of creation.

van Holstein's research also proved that evolution happens differently in land mammals (terrestrial) and sea mammals and bats (non-terrestrial)¬ because of differences in their habitats and differences in their ability to roam freely.

 

van Holstein said: "We found the evolutionary relationship between mammalian species and subspecies differs depending on their habitat. Subspecies form, diversify and increase in number in a different way in non-terrestrial and terrestrial habitats, and this in turn affects how subspecies may eventually become species. For example, if a natural barrier like a mountain range gets in the way, it can separate animal groups and send them off on their own evolutionary journeys. Flying and marine mammals—such as bats and dolphins—have fewer physical barriers in their environment."

The research explored whether subspecies could be considered an early stage of speciation—the formation of a new species. van Holstein said: "The answer was yes. But evolution isn't determined by the same factors in all groups and for the first time we know why because we've looked at the strength of the relationship between species richness and subspecies richness."

The research acts as another scientific warning that the human impact on the habitat of animals will not only affect them now, but will affect their evolution in the future. This information could be used by conservationists to help them determine where to focus their efforts.

 

van Holstein explained: "Evolutionary models could now use these findings to anticipate how human activity like logging and deforestation will affect evolution in the future by disrupting the habitat of species. The impact on animals will vary depending on how their ability to roam, or range, is affected. Animal subspecies tend to be ignored, but they play a pivotal role in longer term future evolution dynamics."

van Holstein is now going to look at how her findings can be used to predict the rate of speciation from endangered species and non-endangered species.

Notes to editors: What Darwin said on page 55 in 'On the Origin of Species': "From looking at species as only strongly-marked and well-defined varieties, I was led to anticipate that the species of the larger genera in each country would oftener present varieties, than the species of the smaller genera; for wherever many closely related species (i.e species of the same genus) have been formed, many varieties or incipient species ought, as a general role, to be now forming. Where many large trees grow, we expect to find saplings."

Datasets: Most of the data is from Wilson and Reeder's Mammal Species Of The World, a global collated database of mammalian taxonomy. The database contains hundreds of years' worth of work by taxonomists from all over the world. The current way of "doing" taxonomy goes all the way back to botanist Carl Linnaeus (1735), so the accumulation of knowledge is the combined work of all taxonomists since then.

 

Source

[Steve Huffey]

The author of this article makes two conjectures that a more experienced person likely would not. 

1. - Proof :  a reader made a good observation that more helpful verbiage would be a ‘hypothesis is claimed confirmed’, and another reader suggests the term ‘supporting evidence’.  Peer review might require a statistical ‘2 sigma’ confidence level and supporting testable data.  2. - A reference to Darwin compared to the Biblical account of creation was unnecessarily included, and moreover was claimed contradictory.  This does highlight a giant problem about false ‘facts’ leading to unnecessary societal polarization on the topic.  This article seems to be for a general media blitz and to originate at - https://www.joh.cam.ac.uk/one-darwins-evolution-theories-finally-proved-cambridge-researcher .  It is helpful to look at the March ‘Proceedings of the Royal Society’ for a more informative introduction, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.2702 

 

Here are some ‘acts’ of Darwin for ‘facts’ from his ‘Origin of the Species’.  Darwin wrote “Creator” nine times, “God” once, and quoted a statement including “God”; all in a positive light.  His famous 60 word closing statement in “Origin” is often gutted of 19 - 20 important words by atheists, bracketed:  "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers,[having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and  that], whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved."  The phrase “by the Creator” was not in the first edition.  In all five subsequent editions, Darwin was more specific, including “by the Creator”.  It refers to the key Genesis 2:7 verse, “And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.” 

Darwin never removed any of his statements about the Creator or God from his book.  He likely died an agnostic due to theodicy concerns after the loss of a young daughter.  This reveals a central struggle in this over 150 year-old discussion, and it continues.  Archaeological discoveries of script used in paleo-Hebrew provide better letter and word values that make the creation story very comfortable with nature then, and especially with the science of nature we know now.  The Jewish Diaspora and Christian Dark Ages caused great loss of meaning.  This is a frontier of recovery for good rigor in both Bible and nature.  Today, Evolutionary Extended Synthesis [EES] uses genetics pioneered 70 years ago by Barbara McClintok, Nobel Laureate.  Its mobile transposable elements in genes, retrotransposons, and other ubiquitous components of DNA in many eukaryotic organisms have much in common with epigenetics. 

They give mechanisms for ‘jumps’ in the fossil record, during catastrophic times.  It and the Biblical creation show progression of life, and correspond well if using good paleo-Hebrew values becoming available.  The context is Design in Biblical revelation and in nature; open to ‘falsifiable’ testing, with measurement and math.  That is a huge step for Both ‘sides’ to rationally fill a chasm, not do a spasm.

 

Keep it up, St. John’s.  I hope Laura van Holstein can add a link to an abstract and data!  My farmer relatives are proud of the bovine namesake, and I of St. John!  Reliable work joins Bible and nature.

 

Steve Huffey, Brouse my name with Darwin for a more informative sourced blog about Darwin above.