aum Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 Says he was warned of an “accident” months before. Google whistleblower Dr. Robert Epstein has suggested that his wife’s fatal car crash may not have been accidental. Last month, Misti Dawn Vaughn’s Ford Ranger spun out of control on a slippery road in California and veered into the path of a tractor trailer. She died from her injuries days later. Police concluded that drugs or alcohol were not factors in the crash. In a tweet posted last night, Epstein appeared to suggest that the crash was not accidental and Vaughn’s vehicle could have been tampered with. “Last year, after I briefed a group of state AGs about #Google’s power to rig elections, one of them said, “I think you’re going to die in an accident in a few months,” wrote Epstein. Last year, after I briefed a group of state AGs about #Google's power to rig elections, one of them said, "I think you're going to die in an accident in a few months." A few months later, my beautiful wife #Misti died a violent death. Makes you wonder. https://t.co/D2lw4e7QPI pic.twitter.com/c7zT1nn4K0 — Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) January 20, 2020 “A few months later, my beautiful wife #Misti died a violent death. Makes you wonder,” he added. Through his exhaustive studies, Epstein has exposed how algorithm manipulation by Big Tech can shift millions of votes during elections. After the 2016 presidential election, Epstein surmised that search engine bias shifted 2-3 million votes in Hillary Clinton’s favor. Epstein has also repeatedly savaged the idea that Big Tech platforms are just “private companies” and can therefore do what they like. “Who on Earth gave these private companies the power to make decisions about what everyone in the world is going to see or not see?” asked Epstein, adding, “These companies shouldn’t have that power, period.” My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me. Source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/summit-news/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aum Posted January 20, 2020 Author Share Posted January 20, 2020 Touché. "The flagrant and simplistic nature of these bogus critiques suggests that Media Bias Fact Check is either inept and/or dishonest." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aum Posted January 20, 2020 Author Share Posted January 20, 2020 The reality of human nature is that people tend to easily accept that which aligns with their preconceived notions but demand very high standards of proof for anything that challenges their presumptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 How far-right extremists rebrand to evade Facebook's ban ' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 Google Whistleblower Suggests His Wife’s Fatal Car Crash May Not Have Been Accidental By Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - January 20, 2020 https://www.infowars.com/google-whistleblower-suggests-his-wifes-fatal-car-crash-may-not-have-been-accidental/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aum Posted January 20, 2020 Author Share Posted January 20, 2020 Also at: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/google-whistleblower-hillary-clinton-car-crash-killed-wife Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. Such an argumentative strategy is tiring, draining, and reflects poorly on people who at every turn attack the messenger rather than commenting on the message (i.e,, content of the article). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.