Google says Stadia will be 'faster and more responsive' than local hardware

[Karlston]

Google says Stadia will be 'faster and more responsive' than local hardware

Prediction is the key, says Stadia's top streaming engineer

(Image credit: Google)

 

In a new interview, Google’s top executive in charge of engineering says that games played on Stadia could run faster and be more responsive than they do on local hardware - e.g. game consoles like the Xbox One and PS4 or a gaming PC. 

 

While this sounds a little outlandish, Google plans on employing a number of techniques to help combat latency caused by connection speeds. 

 

“Ultimately, we think in a year or two we’ll have games that are running faster and feel more responsive in the cloud than they do locally,” said Stadia’s VP of engineering Madj Bakar, “regardless of how powerful the local machine is.”

 

It's also important to note that Bakar isn't saying that Stadia will be better out of the box - he's noting that the service will likely get to that point in the future, after Google's team has some time to work through any issues.

Stadia vs Xbox One and PS4 

That above quote comes from an interview with Bakar and Edge Magazine’s Alex Wiltshire (disclosure: Edge Magazine is owned by Future PLC, the same company that owns TechRadar) where Bakar explained some of the technologies Stadia uses that help overcome issues introduced by latency.

 

Among these technologies are “Negative Latency,” the term Google uses to describe its large stream buffer, boosting frame rates on the server's side to compensate for slow down and an even algorithm that will predict which buttons you’re likely to press next - all to make up for any latency introduced by your connection.

 

When we got a chance to play with Stadia at this year’s E3, we felt that it was a mostly latency-free experience - even on twitchy, quick-response games like Doom Eternal.

 

That said, the demo occurred in the heart of Los Angeles, a major US metropolis, and not in a rural area that’s likely to be further from Google’s data centers and rely on lower-speed internet connections. Just how well Stadia will fare in those circumstances remains to be seen, but we’ll find out when the service goes live in November.

 

Via PCGamesN

• Curious about Stadia? Don't miss our hands on Stadia review

 

 

Source: Google says Stadia will be 'faster and more responsive' than local hardware (TechRadar)

[Ha91]

Although that idea is pretty far-strecthed, I am sure it will require over 500mbps or maybe even a gigabit internet connection to stream and play those games 😛

Also the point is not just that, but you will need a machine that can still visualise and hold off that much data and memory utilisation, in order to play. You can't expect the air to do everything or basically why you need good phones like iPhones to visualise and play good videos which in turn have good processors 😛 You can make many people stupid, but not everyone stupid enough to believe whatever you say 🤣

[Karlston]

23 hours ago, Ha91 said:

I am sure it will require over 500mbps or maybe even a gigabit internet connection to stream and play those games 😛

 

Probably not that much but latency and internet connection reliability will be the make-or-break for users. Stadia will work fine for some and not for others.

 

Google may be a tech powerhouse, but even they can't totally eliminate latency or fix local connection issues.

 

IMO, nothing will be more reliable than a game installed on a local device with a sufficiently fast GPU.

[Ha91]

True or just a console for a one-off cost and no hassle as you said with disks or 😛 cloud stored games