Matrix Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Bottom line: Faced with high fees, slow speeds and poor customer service, many communities in the U.S. have turned to community broadband projects to free themselves from the clutches of major telecom providers. But this isn’t an option for everyone, as 26 states either severely restrict or outright ban community broadband initiatives. Healthy competition is meant to be the cornerstone of the U.S. economy, but the telecom industry has not only never embraced that mentality, it has apparently gone one step further by successfully lobbying to reduce competition through restrictions and outright bans. According to a new report by comparison site Broadbandnow, 26 states have implemented laws that prohibit or severely limit community broadband projects. The report sets out a state-by-state investigation into what limitations have made their way from lobbyists pens to the law books and the picture is pretty bleak. According to the report, “over $92 million was spent in 2018 alone to protect business interests at the national and state level.” Six states have "direct sale prohibitions on municipal broadband" – Arkansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, Texas and Washington. For the other 20 states identified, the limitations range from ‘bureaucratic barriers’ and ‘prohibitive referendum requirements’ to population caps and excessive taxes. Whatever your view on the ongoing debate around net neutrality, the major concern for many people has been a lack of trust in big telecom and the criticism that these companies abuse their monopolistic positions in order to maximize profits. It’s not all bad news however, as the report does set out some efforts by federal and state lawmakers to keep telecom markets competitive, such as a bill put forward by Democrats that aimed to prohibit the kinds of regulations that kill municipal and community projects. While the Community Broadband Act of 2018 was ultimately unsuccessful, it’s at least a sign that this is an issue that Congress is aware of. View Original Article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
v3n0m Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 On 4/21/2019 at 9:59 PM, DonyMach1 said: it’s at least a sign that this is an issue that Congress is aware of. congress.... ahhh our elected oafs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jogs Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 US speaks one way and works on a very different way. And as with all other countries money is what rules the country. Capitalism and Communism both are as good and as bad as its leaders are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
v3n0m Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 On 4/22/2019 at 2:25 AM, Jogs said: US speaks one way and works on a very different way. And as with all other countries money is what rules the country. Capitalism and Communism both are as good and as bad as its leaders are. The president is just a figure head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEmpathicEar Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 In other countries where $$ do hold as such sway with politicians as here is the US, this kind of stuff does not happen [as much]. Some countries started with Fiber Optic cable and pay less than we do for the same bandwidth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ha91 Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 This is barbaric and cruel as well as against the civil liberties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.