nsane.forums Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 Let’s get something out of the way. The UK is not a premier source of ‘cammed’ movies, and it never has been. Although a few badly cammed copies have originated from British cinemas over the years, the overwhelming bulk of pirate copies have appeared on the Internet from other sources, particularly given that most big movies have traditionally premiered overseas.However, for the paranoid movie industry the UK does provide somewhat of a unique worry. While the incidence of cams coming from Britain is particularly insignificant, there is no such thing as an “illegally cammed movie” in the country, because, believe it or not, camming a movie is not illegal.Earlier this year, boss of Vue Cinemas Tim Richards wrote about his dilemma.“We call the police and the police aren’t interested,†said Richards. “So we ask (the pirates) to leave and they leave typically with their cameras and sometimes with their film intact.â€With the law about as much use as a chocolate teapot, cinema chains are resorting to implementing their own “laws” to stop the virtually non-existent cammers and, just like enforced DRM, all they do is annoy paying customers.Jeremy Nicholas describes himself as “an award winning TV and radio broadcaster, after dinner speaker, compere and media trainer.” Like many of use, he also enjoys a good movie.After work on Wednesday this week, Jeremy went to watch the new Bruce Willis movie at a cinema belonging to Cineworld, the UK’s second largest multiplex chain. Like most people on his way home, Jeremy had items on his person that enable him to do his job – one of them was a Sony laptop, an item too expensive to risk leaving in the car, particularly since it contained his current work projects, “plus some half baked book ideas.”Because he had his laptop with him, Cineworld refused him entry.Jeremy pointed out that his laptop has no camera feature, or additional hardware to record movies. Then, as if it is any of their damn business, cinema staff then enquired why he had bought it to the cinema at all. He duly explained he was on his way home from work.Cinema staff then conceded Jeremy could be let in, but only if they could take his laptop from him. However, the cinema offered no receipt for the hardware, so Jeremy declined.“So despite them treating customers with suspicion, as though were are all bootleggers, we have to trust them to get our equipment back,” said Jeremy.“I was looking forward to watching the new Bruce Willis film. I wondered what Bruce would do under pressure,” he continued. “I wasn’t wearing a white vest, but decided I wasn’t standing for any nonsense and called for the manager. After a short time a small boy appeared. Sorry I said, I want to see the manager.”But the small boy was the manager, who told Jeremy that they were acting on new “guidelines” from FACT – the MPAA-funded Federation Against Copyright Theft, which advised banning laptops.Although the manager said Jeremy could go in with his laptop after all, a query was raised over his cellphone which did have the ability to record a movie. He could take it in, he was told, as long as he had no intentions to cam Bruce Willis with it.“Not the most rigorous interrogation and one that a determined bootlegger probably could have passed,” said Jeremy.And then, just to show how ridiculous this ban is, Jeremy said as he was being questioned, a number of suspects customers walked past with handbags and rucksacks, any of which could’ve contained recording equipment.But Jeremy enjoyed the movie in the end.“"Surrogates’ is about a future world where people have been replaced by robots. Everything ran smoothly for a while, but in the end it all went wrong because the robots were efficient but lacked humanity. Cineworld should show this to their staff as a training movie. (As long as none of them try and record it),” Jeremy concludes.Perhaps it’s time for Cineworld to remove the statement below from their website:Founded in 1995, our philosophy has been to provide a modern, clean environment that makes “cinema going” a pleasurable experience, which in turn encourages frequent return visits.Article from: TorrentFreak, check out our new blog at FreakBits. View: Original Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizarre™ Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 Screw the ban.I'm more interested in the movie :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJPrice Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 Screw the ban.I'm more interested in the movie :DThe movie is crap! :)I've gone to my local cineworld many times with my laptop with me & no one has ever said anything to me, not sure if being a cineworld unlimited card holder makes any difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HX1 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 Okay.. one thing..just my view.. and this is just me going alone to the movie..Why would I spend $20+ to buy drinks, food, ( and nasty junk at that which is not healthy ) to watch a movie which is going to be continuously interrupted by people talking, up and down..across the isles..talking on their phones.. and going on like they aren't even there for the movie? Not to mention sticky floors.. and who knows what has been going on in those seats.. but it feels like WWIII..I can't get comfortable.. I can't stop/pause the movie...and I am probably going to miss a bunch of it..not to mention piss myself trying no to.. to only turn around and spend more money to watch it in peace...with better sound.... and why in the hell would I go that far.. burn that much fossil fuels... to sit down and use my computer... Theaters haven't held that 'certain something' since I was a child... Definitely not now...Personally I think that things have changed and people need to change their habits and environment along with it.. How inefficient can some things get.. How much waste is out there and why is it that people still gain from it anyway...Why do people not think about it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myidisbb Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 i beleive he was hand carrying his laptop in which is why the stupid little teenage brat workers saw he and questioned him. the backpacks and big bags carried in by others wasnt checked because the stupid little teenage brat workers didnt see a laptop sticking out in the open. im pretty sure the bag carriers are bring in soda bottles and snacks which the stupid little teenage brat workers should been more worry aboutbtw, i watch that movie as r5 from newsgroups. it was okay. though would never gotten into public usage beside one company making them all for everyone in the world. you just know china wouldnt went with that nor middleeast countries (security problem with terrorist)bacially what i think gonig on is by makiing these illegal policies the public in britian over time will think they are legal laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HATE9X Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 when ur in a good cinema with a good flick and are well baked, the experience can sometimes surpass watching home.. now with HD tho, even watching movies home is great.. tbh, some movies are great on big screen (e.g. Knowing, I was so stoned the fx felt awesome), others better at home, more relaxed..so, this CAMming thing.. since there indeed are no CAMs from UK really, I say this is BS and might actually make someone in UK start CAMming movies.. just to throw out a fck u to these tards.. I mean cams are not as popular anymore, are they in the late train or what?they just try to remind ppl to get their cellphones/cams out or wut? :frusty: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.