Jump to content

AV Comparatives Malware Protection Test - September 2018


nir

Recommended Posts

Test Results

Total Online Protection Rates (clustered in groups):

Please consider also the false alarm rates when looking at the protection rates below.

 
  Blocked User dependent Compromised Protection Rate
[Blocked % + (User dependent % / 2)]
Cluster
Avast 11890 - - 100% 1
AVG 11890 - - 100% 1
McAfee 11890 - - 100% 1
Symantec 11890 - - 100% 1
Tencent 11890 - - 100% 1
Bitdefender 11889 - 1 99.99% 1
Microsoft 11889 - 1 99.99% 1
Trend Micro 11889 - 1 99.99% 1
Avira 11888 - 2 99.98% 1
Vipre 11888 - 2 99.98% 1
Panda 11887 - 3 99.97% 1
Emsisoft 11884 - 6 99.95% 1
ESET 11882 - 7 99.93% 1
 
Quick Heal 11870 17 3 99.9% 2
Kaspersky Lab 11875 1 12 99.88% 2
BullGuard 11887 - 13 99.97% 2
F-Secure 11874 - 16 99.87% 2
 
K7 11870 - 20 99.83% 3


The test-set used contained 11890 recent/prevalent samples from last few weeks.

 

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 458
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...