Matrix Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 What just happened? Twitter today announced an upcoming expansion to its "hateful conduct" policy, which would extend its existing hate speech rules to ban "dehumanizing" speech. This would prevent users from comparing "identifiable groups" of people to animals, viruses, or other less-than-human forms of life. Social media platforms have faced a variety of issues lately, but one of the biggest problems companies like Facebook and Twitter contend with is platform moderation. On the one hand, said tech giants have a vested interest in promoting discussion between users. After all, that's arguably what the platforms are designed for. On the other hand, they feel the need to protect their users from language and actions they deem offensive, including "hateful conduct" like race, sex, or disability-based verbal attacks. While lively debates surrounding perceived censorship are rampant on Twitter, many users agree that the company's current policy is fairly neutral. It may be enforced too little or too much depending on who you ask, but the wording of the policy itself does not seem terribly problematic. However, Twitter's latest moderation rules will likely prove much more controversial. According to a blog post published today, Twitter has been developing a set of policies designed to address "dehumanizing language" on its platform. This new policy would expand Twitter's existing hateful conduct rules to cover language that "dehumanizes others based on their membership in an identifiable group, even when the material does not include a direct target." This is a remarkably vague rule proposal, and it's tough to even guess at what it might mean. Fortunately, Twitter elaborates on some of the terms it uses. For starters, it considers "dehumanization" to be any language that treats others as, well, less than human. For example, if a Twitter user decides to apply animalistic attributes to a group of users -- such as comparing said group to a "virus" or animal -- that would be considered dehumanization. To reference an internet cliche, calling a group of people "cancer" might be grounds for a ban, warning, or some other form of disciplinary action under this future policy. So, that still leaves the term "identifiable group," which Twitter defines as follows: Any group of people that can be distinguished by their shared characteristics such as their race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, serious disease, occupation, political beliefs, location, or social practices. Whether or not this policy will backfire remains to be seen, but regardless of where you stand on the matter, now is the time to make your voice heard. Twitter has opened up a feedback survey to its users ahead of this policy's launch in a couple of weeks. source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Are they going to remove all the porn off there too? It's starting to sound like a workplace than a Internet site . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lurch234 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Hah! This reminds me of when the US decided to go to war against drugs. That turned out well now, did it...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 15 minutes ago, lurch234 said: Hah! This reminds me of when the US decided to go to war against drugs. That turned out well now, did it...? Well it turned about pretty good for me i was partying back in them days. When Nancy was saying no too drugs the was CIA bringing it in by the plane loads and they invented Crack and caused a epidemic. They even made a show about it now. Snowfall https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6439752/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1 "Freeway" Rick Ross on How He Introduced Crack to the U.S. and Made Millions Off the War on Drugs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soze Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 War on drugs is immoral tyranny. Now they use Civil asset forfeiture on mom and pop. Biggest gang in USA are the boys in blue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Twitter will just end up losing most of there users and i don't care it's not my cup a tea, it's a hot zone for journalist , instead of going out in the street and reporting on real crime they go on twitter and post stories about what people say on there . Sites like that is part of whats wrong with the world today. But theirs still a war on Drugs the jails are full of non violent offenders, if they would of made it legal years ago all these people wouldn't be in jail . because it would of been hard to get rich off it, or make a $1000 a week selling it if you was a small time dealer.. Modern Prohibition started in 1970 but the laws they follow today go back 80 years. Only there were a few months in 1969 the Marihuana Tax Act was not in effect because in 1970 it got repealed and they gave it another name . Controlled Substances Act violates the Fifth Amendment Leary v. United States case 1969. Quote But the spirit of the Marihuana Tax Act lives on. Namely, in the Controlled Substances Act Congress passed in 1970, which ultimately repealed (and replaced) the 1937 law. Jumping ahead nearly fifty years—well, more than 80 since the Tax Act—the US federal government still considers cannabis to be a Schedule I substance, with “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.” We live with that prohibition today. United States: Bill Proposes To End Federal Government's 80-Year-Old War On Marijuana http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/728278/food+drugs+law/Bill+Proposes+to+End+Federal+Governments+80YearOld+War+on+Marijuana It want never pass but something like it maybe will in a few years from now with a different President. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.