Jump to content

Court: Usenet Provider Can Be Held Liable for Pirating Users


Recommended Posts

German music rights group GEMA is celebrating a legal victory against Aviteo, the company behind Usenet provider UseNeXT. The Regional Court of Hamburg ruled that the Usenet provider can be held liable for copyright infringements committed by its users. No damages amount has been established and the ruling can still be appealed.

Many seasoned file-sharers, who’ve been around for a while, will recognize UseNeXT as a familiar brand.

The Usenet provider advertised its services on popular platforms in the past, including many torrent sites. These promotional efforts also drew the interest of rightsholders, but not in a good way.

In Germany, the local music rights group GEMA, which represents roughly 72,000 artists, took UseNeXT’s parent company Aviteo to court. The first request for an injunction dates back to December 2006, almost twelve years ago but, despite several judgments, the battle is not over yet.

GEMA does, however, get to celebrate another victory this week.

The Regional Court of Hamburg recently ruled that the service provider can be held liable if its business model promotes the upload and distribution of copyrighted content.

According to the court, Aviteo Ltd is liable for the copyright infringements committed by its users in this case, which means that it must pay damages to GEMA.

“The judgment is a groundbreaking success for all authors”, GEMA’s legal advisor Dr. Tobias Holzmüller comments on the news.

“Online services like UseNeXT are primarily responsible and cannot hide behind legal privileges. The judges of the Hamburg Court have set an important precedent for claims for Internet piracy related damages.”

Traditionally speaking Usenet is a content-neutral system. However, providers such as UseNeXT offer specialized software that can make it easier for users to find specific content. If the software promotes infringement, a service can get in trouble.

According to GEMA, it is clear that UseNeXT went too far in this case.

“All in all, the offer is clearly geared to the download of works protected by copyright. This makes the services so lucrative for their operators,” the music rights group notes.

“The judges of the Hamburg Court clearly stated in their verdict that services whose business model is based on the illegal downloads of protected works owe rightsholders.”

Tarnkappe reports that while the verdict is another setback for the Usenet provider, it can still be appealed and is not final. The scale of the damages amount has yet to be established as well.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Views 813
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yes but :) There are a lot of pages that you can "buy" music for free jaja :) Anyway, it's so nice that they celebrate their victory XD !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Many of the early internet adoptors remember usenet as the precursor of today's torrents... And it is still  a viable sharing platform after copyright holders went for the big torrent players.


Then it It was either that or IRC or those yummy FTP servers ...










Link to comment
Share on other sites

you will only get major releases on newsgroups but way fewer.


nonenglish is pretty much not available at all.


even with listing sites you always run across unvomplete

scene releases. so why people tend to use it is mystery 

to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if this means that the German government can be held responsible for car accidents on the roads that THEY build and provide?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it really worth dragging people in to court for music piracy these days,

streaming music is les than 9 usd / month and artists recieve almost




Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...