nsane.forums Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 Microsoft has historically been rather hush hush when it comes to it's share in the sale of a new PC that includes an OEM copy of Windows, but one general manager of Corporate Strategy at Microsoft revealed some interesting figures.While none of this information is official, and we're sure that Windows licensing costs vary from one OEM to the next depending on negotiate deals, it seems that Microsoft takes about $50 per PC that costs around $1000."If you think of the $1,000 PC, which has kind of been the benchmark for the last decade or so, then we've always charged about $50 for the copy of Windows for that PC," Songhurst revealed at the Jefferies Annual Technology Conference, as reported by Ars Technica."So that's five percent. So if you think about charging $100, $200 or if you think about a super high-end PC, you know the Sony Vaios or anything that's there for around the $1000 mark, or the Alienware PCs that are even higher, if we can get that constant percentage then we should be indifferent to the number five points in the market," Songhurst continued. Clearly, taking a $50 cut from a $300 netbook is something that most OEMs would probably find to be disadvantageous, which would make one think that alternative operating systems such as Ubuntu would have the upper hand. But Microsoft seems to think that it would be happy if it could score five percent from every new PC sale, particularly with the increased range of PC prices with the advent of netbooks and $300 laptops at Wal-Mart. View: Original Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizarre™ Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 They're underestimating the power of 5% :rolleyes:I can only say M$ is cunning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeetPirate Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 Well somebody has to make up for the 0% we pay. ;) :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Owl Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 M$ is also greedy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naota Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 lol to leetpirate :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizarre™ Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 @LeetPirate:Indeed :tooth: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CODYQX4 Posted September 26, 2009 Share Posted September 26, 2009 M$ is also greedy.I personally think this is a good deal for the OEM's.At least until they sell above $1000 !But almost all laptop sales go under this. Most of the laptops I see sold are in the $250 - 900 range.Unless it is high end, or a Mac (which won't have Windows anyway), OEM's will save the cash, and Microsoft can easier stop Linux on cheap laptops. That's a $35 savings for OEM's, and then they don't have to make drivers and support Linux (I doubt any of the half assed support know anthing about it anyway), therefore saving money.Moving away from Windows doesn't actually save in the end, it causes more demand on support (2 OS VS 1), and they have to mak drivers and stuff for their custom distro.I didn't see them sell well without Windows anyway. I know someone who had an XP disc in hand before even opening the box! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HX1 Posted September 26, 2009 Share Posted September 26, 2009 You make a VERY good point right there.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.