dcs18 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 12 hours ago, Undertaker said: You remember we discussing how it's blocking even the HTML in program, that doesn't happen in the extension(even with the same rule). Apart from its most effective character, the only reason for my replacing uMatrix with Adguard was that Adguard blocks more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent 86 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 deleted and reported, sorry guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 25 minutes ago, dcs18 said: Apart from its most effective character, the only reason for my replacing uMatrix with Adguard was that Adguard blocks more. Yes that's true but it also create hurdles if you are not well versed like you said some of your customers saying it blocks too much. http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/301971-adguard-fights-stealth-cryptocurrency-mining-on-websites/?do=findComment&comment=1263953 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Yeah, but those hurdles are just temporal and not gonna be lasting forever — the same as when we switched all client machines to uMatrix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Yeah that's why I said one needs to be familiar with the concept because adguard is thorough otherwise you won;t even be able to access external links from within a site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Another reason for my not using the add-on as a standalone is the speed of deployment that integration mode brings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, dcs18 said: Another reason for my not using the add-on as a standalone is the speed of deployment that integration mode brings. I personally found using it as standalone to the prog to be faster. ATM though I don't use the extension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Have never had the opportunity to try the standalone — shall give that a run, at leisure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 6 minutes ago, dcs18 said: Have never had the opportunity to try the standalone — shall give that a run, at leisure. Also give the standalone version(the one exclusively available at github page) of the extension a chance whenever you try it. It has extended capability(JS rules) not available to regular builds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.