Petrovic Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Full Article(PDF) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
attacker Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Norton is not included? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pc71520 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 2 hours ago, attacker said: Norton is not included? Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Omfg this is utter bullshit. Kaspersky increases Windows boot loading by 4-5 seconds while Microsoft's defender has no effect or almost no effect. how much fraud??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlienForce1 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 For me KIS 17.0.0.611 is faster than ESET Av. in accesing web-pages and downloading files from internet . Also , when somebody complains that it`s pc is slow - first step I change avast! (or Avira) with ESET and the pc becomes faster ... (and I choose for them ESET instead of KIS only because it`s easier to find a med. for it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashwadeep Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 Agree with @Alienforce1 Kaspersky is much faster in performance and file execution than ESET I used to love eset but it slows down pc(Launching Chrome takes hell lot of time), Thats why Using KAV now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pc71520 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 18 hours ago, saeed_dc said: Microsoft's defender has no effect or almost no effect. Especially when it comes to Malware... https://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart1.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 3 hours ago, pc71520 said: Especially when it comes to Malware... https://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart1.php everyone knows these tests are paid and not reliable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted November 4, 2016 Administrator Share Posted November 4, 2016 22 hours ago, saeed_dc said: Omfg this is utter bullshit. Kaspersky increases Windows boot loading by 4-5 seconds while Microsoft's defender has no effect or almost no effect. how much fraud??? See the last AV in that list, far right. 55 minutes ago, saeed_dc said: everyone knows these tests are paid and not reliable Paid for checking, correct, not fully reliable, correct, but paid for giving marks, I doubt so. There is a reason about 3 AVs are not tested anymore including a famous one. The back story of those gives these guys enough credibility I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 2 minutes ago, DKT27 said: See the last AV in that list, far right. what about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pc71520 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 40 minutes ago, saeed_dc said: everyone knows these tests are paid and not reliable -Why doesn't Microsoft, which is the richest of all Test-participants, pay the AV-Tester and get the 1st place? -Why doesn't Microsoft abandon these AV-Tests and publicly state that these Tests are biased? Let's be honest: Whenever an AV-Tester ranks low a specific AV-vendor, the supporters (= fanboys, shills etc.) of the particular AV-vendor attack the credibility of the AV-Tester. This has been a common pattern of reaction... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 1 minute ago, pc71520 said: -Why doesn't Microsoft, which is the richest of all Test-participants, pay the AV-Tester and get the 1st place? -Why doesn't Microsoft abandon these AV-Tests and publicly state that these Tests are biased? Let's be honest: Whenever an AV-Tester ranks low a specific AV-vendor, the supporters (= fanboys, shills etc.) of the particular AV-vendor attack the credibility of the AV-Tester. This has been a common pattern of reaction... yeah but im a Kaspersky user and not Windows defender. so your terms don't apply to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pc71520 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 46 minutes ago, saeed_dc said: yeah but im a Kaspersky user and not Windows defender. so your terms don't apply to me These are not MY own terms. This is how Fanboys/Shills behave on various Fora. You use an Antivirus (Kaspersky) whose developer has not complained about these Tests, but you claimed that 1 hour ago, saeed_dc said: everyone knows these tests are paid and not reliable So, whom should I believe? You or Eugene Kaspersky? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylence Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 10 minutes ago, pc71520 said: Then, why did you wrote...? you want me praise this test while i know it's corrupt? I just told the truth and what I experienced. Kaspersky is NO WAY lighter than Windows defender..no way at all. but these results... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.