Jump to content

Court Rejects Massive Torrent Damages Claim, Admin Avoids Jail


Reefa

Recommended Posts

Quote

A former torrent site operator has largely avoided the goals of an aggressive movie industry prosecution in Sweden. Against a backdrop of demands for years in prison and millions in damages, the 25-year-old owner of private tracker SwePiracy was handed 100 hours community service and told to pay $194,000.

 

swepiracy.jpg

 

Founded a decade ago in 2006, SwePiracy grew to become one of the most famous private torrent sites on the Swedish scene. As such, it became a target for anti-piracy outfits.

 

In February 2012 following an investigation by anti-piracy group Antipiratbyrån (now Rights Alliance), police in Sweden and the Netherlands took coordinated action to shut down the site.

 

Earlier this year its now 25-year-old operator appeared in court to answer charges relating to the unlawful distribution of a sample 27 movies between March 2011 and February 2012. The prosecution demanded several years in prison and nearly $3 million (25k kronor) in damages.

 

During the trial last month, SwePiracy defense lawyer Per E. Samuelsson, who also represents Julian Assange and previously took part in The Pirate Bay trial, said the claims against his client were the most unreasonable he’d seen in his 35 years as a lawyer.

 

After deliberating for three weeks, the Norrköping District Court handed down its decision today. SwePiracy’s former operator was found guilty of copyright infringement but it appears the prosecution’s demands for extremely harsh punishment were largely dismissed.

 

The torrent site operator avoided a lengthy jail sentence and was sentenced to probation and 100 hours community service instead. The prosecution’s claim for damages was dramatically reduced from millions to ‘just’ $148,000, payable to movie outfit Nordisk Film. On top, the state confiscated $45,600 said to have been generated by SwePiracy.

 

While the sentence certainly could’ve been worse, it appears that the 25-year-old will still mount an appeal.

 

“I have been in contact with my client and we will appeal both the conviction and the issue of damages. He thinks that the court went high with the damages,” Per E. Samuelsson told IDG.

 

And it appears the prosecution aren’t happy with the outcome either. Henrik Pontén from Rights Alliance says that Nordisk Film may also appeal since the District Court failed to apply principles previously applied in the trial of The Pirate Bay.

 

The parties have until November 1 to file an appeal.

 

source

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 2
  • Views 768
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm not a lawyer, but I have spent hundreds of hours in courtrooms, and thousands of hours with lawyers and judges (dating them, not working with them) and from a legal perspective it would seem likely that a finding of guilty in one country could be the basis for a finding of guilty in another country for sharing video files copyrighted in that country.  There is no case I know of off hand where that has occurred but I am surprised that the copyright mongrels haven't gone after defendants in other countries that have been found guilty.  That seems like a reasonable thing for them to do, about as reasonable as anything else they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Same I am not a lawyer but I have worked around them for 25 years and the one motto they apply is "litigate and litigate aggressively" just give them time and eventually the will build up enough precedence to start applying this ShXT internationally. Sooner or latter they are going to tighten the screws -  god help us all when they do!  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...