Holdren: Infants Not Human Beings

[Ambrocious]

Jurriaan Maessen

Infowars

August 7, 2009

The infamous Holdren quotes from the 1977 ‘Ecoscience’ textbook, proposing forced sterilizations and other draconian measures to bring about mass death, are no incidental exercises in academic frivolity. In the 1973 publication ‘Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions’, co-authored by his old buddies, the Ehrlichs, Holdren wrote quite candidly about his basic view on human life, providing us with a peek at the undergrowth out of which the Ecoscience document has emerged, proposing among other things a ‘planetary regime’ to assume command of matters of life and death.

John P. Holdren, the lead Science Czar for President Obama is just one Eugenicist among many. This info added by me, Ambrocious.

In chapter 8 of the ‘Human Ecology’-document, page 235, Holdren gives us his definition of human life:

“The fetus”, Holdren writes, “given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being.”

In other words, Holdren argues that people during the early years after birth, cannot yet be defined as human beings. Given this presumption by Obama’s science advisor, it may not be surprising to learn that he does not shy away from coercive abortion policies or other such measures to scale back the population. After all, if an infant cannot be construed as being a human being, as Holdren argues, God-given rights do not apply to them nor does constitutional protection- and therefore they can be considered as completely at the government’s mercy.

Just like in Ecoscience, Holdren and the Ehrlichs present the case for involuntary fertility control in the Human Ecology monstrosity:

“Several coercive proposals deserve discussion mainly because societies may ultimately have to resort to them unless trends in birth rates are rapidly reversed by other means.”

Although the authors deem “compulsory control of family size” as being “unpalatable”, they nevertheless prefer it to other methods:

“(…) the alternatives may be much more horrifying. As those alternatives become clearer to an increasing number of people in the 1970s, we may well find them demanding such control. A far better choice, in our view, is to begin now with milder methods of influencing family size preferences, while ensuring that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time. If effective action is taken promptly perhaps the need for involuntary or repressive measures can be averted.”

One has to wear ear pads the size of Texas Choice grapefruits to miss the threatening implications of these words. Just as Holdren’s comments have not been penned down in a vacuum, Holdren himself does not stand alone in his chilling stance. There is an entire subgroup within the scientific community consisting of a neo-Malthusian cast of characters, filling all kinds of official functions in public and private life. But when one of these demons (with a rap sheet listing numerous examples of an abject disregard for human life) occupies a key position within the government there should be some consequence- preferably a dethronement followed by an unequivocal denouncement on the part of the President.

Out of which sublevel place do these rats come crawling up onto the surface of respectability? The answer: a very unwholesome place indeed, with a lineage that can be traced straight back to the Rockefeller-funded eugenics and- family planning apparatus, set in motion many decades before. The fact that the writings of John P. Holdren and company haven’t generated the massive outrage they deserve is an outrage in its own right. Taking into account that the author is Obama’s chief science advisor, serious thought should be given to legal steps against Mr. Holdren- effectively resulting in the removal of this individual from his current position and exposing the neo-Malthusian tendency to worm their way into both the scientific and political establishments.

SOURCE: InfoWars.com

ADDITIONAL SOURCES: questia and CNSNews

[jalaffa]

Me wearing ear pads the size of Texas Choice grapefruits than :)

[Ambrocious]

John P Holdren believes strongly in Eugenics. He believes that any person born with any abnormality or disorder or defect is considered "less human" than others and should be put down. He also is saying that some people should not ever be allowed to procreate based on genetic flaws (crafted after Hitlers Eugenics tactics to eradicate anyone less human than what he thought to be human).

Being since Holdren is Obama's top science Czar, he quite literally has nearly all the authority as if he was ABOVE the law to create new laws and regulations, meanwhile torching the US Constitution in the process. Here is a short description of a Czar:

Occasionally, the word could be used to designate other, non-Christian, supreme rulers. In Russia and Bulgaria the imperial connotations of the term were blurred with time and, by the 19th century, it had come to be viewed as an equivalent of King.

So you see, back then, the Czar was held just as high as any king (President now days) and so what we have now is several other Czar's in the White House with authority and privileges almost more relevant that Obama is making rules that will lead to much chaos.

It is clear that the world Elite are behind all that you see now and they are trying to quickly accomplish their goal of exterminating more than 80% of the worlds population. One may not rationalize in this way unless you have some information from the inside OR unless you have been faced with corruption from the higher ups from time to time. One way to find out is to watch "ENDGAME: Blueprint For Global Enslavement" and then watch "The Obama Deception".

[HX1]

We are not alike.. if we are.. Then something has taken you far away from yourself..

[Bizarre™]

This John P. Holdren person acts all high and mighty, doesn't he?

Well, sorry to break his bubbles: he's not a God.

He's just like the rest of us, a human being full of flaws.

[myidisbb]

This John P. Holdren person acts all high and mighty, doesn't he?

Well, sorry to break his bubbles: he's not a God.

He's just like the rest of us, a human being full of flaws.

no he is a czar

you know the saying, everyone is equal but some are more equaly. animal farm

his sob is one of 3 with in nOmaba ear

[Ambrocious]

Even Congressman Ron Paul is saying that people are waking up all over the world. He said that we are on the verge of a revolution. Before that happens, we are bound to see AT LEAST one false flag operation on the United States AND probably elsewhere in the world. The inside info Alex Jones gets is suggesting we are weeks away (if not closer) to seeing something freaking horrible. Stock up on food (dried fruits and canned foods) and plenty of fresh water, NOT including tap water which is proven to be contaminated with all sorts of garbage.

[manpe]

Can you link to Ron Paul's statement?

[Ambrocious]

It was a verbal address that Ron Paul gave the other day on the Alex Jones show. You can listen to his show by opening your Windows Media Player and pressing Ctrl + U and adding this address: http://www.infowars.com/infowars.asx . Other ways of listing in can be found here: http://www.infowars.com/listen.html

Every day he has a live broadcast (minus on Saturdays which is a retransmission) and then once it is done, it goes into retransmission mode until his next live address. The Archives are somewhere out there. I think it was on the 6th when Ron Paul said what he said.