Jump to content

AV-Comparatives: Real-World Protection Test-July 2016


Petrovic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11
  • Views 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Looking at these results AVG put some pep in there step or paid for those results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


11 hours ago, Crazycanuk said:

With 0 false positives to boot, <_<

Since i've not had a malware infection in many years i will stick to what i have witch has very few false positives . A antivirus will not get you but so far .. Beefing up browser security with a good adblocker  popupblocker .script blocker is just as important  Also i dont even install flash for my browser or Java anymore.  .. what a antivirus is  for me anyway is encase everything else was to fail  it will pick it up and stop it i hope and to scan files i download . Since most infections come from using a browser it needs protected most . Ive never installed a Antivirus or Anti malware based on these test  and i been online since windows me.  so im not going to start now. Not everyone meets this test or any test conditions in the real world. Who in real life tries to get infected ?  :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Lavasoft better than Kaspersky or Bitdefender. Lolz 

 

Windows Defender's position though...better than mcAfee yayy

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...