Jump to content

Judge In Child Porn Case Reverses Course, Says FBI Will Not Have To Turn Over Details On Its Hacking Tool


Reefa

Recommended Posts

Back in February, the judge presiding over the FBI's case against Jay Michaud ordered the agency to turn over information on the hacking tool it used to unmask Tor users who visited a seized child porn site. The FBI further solidified its status as a law unto itself by responding that it would not comply with the court's order, no matter what.

Unfortunately, we won't be seeing any FBI officials tossed into jail cells indefinitely for contempt of court charges. The judge in that case has reversed course, as Motherboard reports.

 

Quote

The government's motion has been granted, and the FBI does not have to provide the exploit code to the defense as previously ordered. That means that the defense in the case will probably be unable to examine how the evidence against their client was collected in the first place.

It is not totally clear why Judge Robert J. Bryan changed his mind. On Thursday, the government and Bryan held a private meeting, where the government presented its reasons for nondisclosure of the Tor Browser exploit.

 

The judge apparently believes the defense should still be able to examine the code but apparently can't be bothered with ensuring this will happen.

 

Quote

Despite backtracking somewhat, Bryan still thinks the defense has a reason to see that code, according to audio of the public section of Thursday’s hearing provided by activist Phil Mocek. Of course, whether the FBI decides to then provide it is another matter.

 

Given the FBI's earlier promise to withhold the details of the NIT despite being ordered to disclose them, I'd say there's about a 0% chance of the FBI voluntarily turning this information over to the defense. Right now, the agency is working overtime just trying to keep the evidence it obtained with its hacking tool from being tossed out of three other courts. It's also facing the prospect that third-party interlopers like Mozilla may still result in it having to release these details to someone outside of its own offices. At this point, hardly anything's going the FBI's way, so it will take whatever it can get, even if it's only temporary relief.

 

source

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 4
  • Views 604
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If the FBI gives up the information to the tor developers tor team is going to patch the exploit the nit uses to deanonymize tor users and there goes the fbis nit and the fbis ability to take down additional porn sites.  In there private meeting they offered the judge money bribed the judge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


straycat19
9 hours ago, Reefa said:

 

The primary reason for a judge to reverse himself in a case involving the techniques of data/evidence collection is that there is an ongoing investigation (read that as monitoring TOR users currently) and divulging information on how they do it could affect the current investigation.  In reality, I don't care how they do it as long as they get the criminals and perverts off the street.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote

 

It is not totally clear why Judge Robert J. Bryan changed his mind. On Thursday, the government and Bryan held a private meeting, where the government presented its reasons for nondisclosure of the Tor Browser exploit.

 

 

It's looking really bad for the judge now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...