Reefa Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Quote Ever heard of an “app interception system”? So-called app interception or cloud interception systems are small physical boxes that steal social media passwords, emails, Dropbox contents and more from smartphones of passers-by, all with no interaction from the target. Now, in response to Freedom of Information requests from Motherboard, the FBI has refused to neither confirm nor deny whether the agency has any contracts with two of the main companies selling such devices. “The mere acknowledgment of whether or not the FBI has any such records in and of itself would disclose techniques, procedures, and/or guidelines that could reasonably be expected to risk of circumvention of the law. Thus, the FBI neither confirms nor denies the existence of any records,” the responses to two requests read. In January, Motherboard requested copies of contracts between the agency and three companies: Magen 100, Rayzone Group, and Wintego, which all market their technology to law enforcement and intelligence agencies. One of Rayzone Group's products is InterApp, which, according to a company brochure, can siphon passwords, emails, previous location information, contact lists, photos, internet browsing history and technical information such as the target phone's MAC address. The device requires “minimal training,” and “no technical skills” are necessary, the brochure continues. (The company also sells IMSI catchers, used to track mobile phones by their unique identifier; malware for computers and mobiles; and social media monitoring technology). Magen 100 sells very much the same thing, and point specifically to Gmail users being vulnerable. A brochure indicates the company also sells a more portable version that can fit into a backpack. Motherboard’s request regarding Wintego, that sells a similar product, is yet to receive a response. When sent similar requests, the Drug Enforcement Administration said that it held no responsive documents for all three companies. The FBI surrounds its use of surveillance technology in extreme secrecy, whether that's tools such as Stingrays, or computer exploits to identify suspected criminals on the dark web. If the FBI ever does start buying boxes that can steal your Gmail password, the agency is probably going to keep tight-lipped about them as well for some time. source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straycat19 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Requestors, Motherboard in this case, are assuming that the FBI is stupid. They could have literally thousands of these devices and not have one piece of paper from any of the companies that provide them. All they have to do is have another agency, either inside or outside of the federal government, purchase the devices and then do a property transfer from the purchaser to the FBI. Thus the FBI can honestly say we have not dealt with any of those companies nor do we have any records of purchases from them. Why do you think the CIA replied in the negative? Would you bet your data that the CIA doesn't have hundreds of these devices themselves. The only way to avoid these devices is to keep your phone turned off until you absolutely need to access it and then to make sure you are in a place that is remote and private. Otherwise give us all your data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vibranium Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 The FBI did not buy them, they acquired them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 21 hours ago, straycat19 said: Requestors, Motherboard in this case, are assuming that the FBI is stupid. They could have literally thousands of these devices and not have one piece of paper from any of the companies that provide them. All they have to do is have another agency, either inside or outside of the federal government, purchase the devices and then do a property transfer from the purchaser to the FBI. Thus the FBI can honestly say we have not dealt with any of those companies nor do we have any records of purchases from them. Why do you think the CIA replied in the negative? Would you bet your data that the CIA doesn't have hundreds of these devices themselves. The only way to avoid these devices is to keep your phone turned off until you absolutely need to access it and then to make sure you are in a place that is remote and private. Otherwise give us all your data. The FBI never buys nothing all there money comes from the Tax Payers .And the FBI done got Rand Paul on there butt ..hes the same one who caused NSA reform so most likely if rule 41 ever gets passed its not going not even be the same bill as Supreme Court and the FBI wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pequi Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 On quinta-feira, 12 de maio de 2016 at 1:03 PM, Reefa said: The device requires “minimal training,” and “no technical skills” Sounds like an ad. Fits the FBI to a "T". No wonder they bought them. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.