anuraag Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 mIRC is a full featured Internet Relay Chat client for Windows that can be used to communicate, share, play or work with others on IRC networks around the world, either in multi-user group conferences or in one-to-one private discussions. It has a clean, practical interface that is highly configurable and supports features such as buddy lists, file transfers, multi-server connections, SSL encryption, proxy support, UTF-8 display, customizable sounds, spoken messages, tray notifications, message logging, and more. mIRC also has a powerful scripting language that can be used both to automate mIRC and to create applications that perform a wide range of functions from network communications to playing games. Thanks to ARMOUR for the update.Download Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Journey Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 The download link on the front page is wrong and you get erroneous tag information. Download mIRC 7.45 trial version from link below: Site: http://www.mirc.co.uk Sharecode[?]: /get.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolkips Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Alternative download link: http://www.mirc.com/get.php?version=745 Latest News mIRC 7.45 has been released! (April 25th 2016) This is a small update that fixes an issue with the way BAN/UNBAN events are handled. This issue was introduced in a recent change to mIRC and we decided it was important enough, and affected enough users, to release a small update to fix it. This update includes the following improvements, changes and fixes: Fixed on BAN/UNBAN event bug that caused it to not be triggered on mode +b/-b events. Updated channels /list feature to send *matchtext* to server in LIST request on Undernet and Quakenet. Fixed DCC Send file dialog nickname combobox being incorrectly sized. Fixed $sdir() new file dialogs not handling invalid path names. Fixed $sfile() new file dialogs not filling in filename editbox. Fixed tray tips bug that caused gpf triggered by right-click on tray tip. Fixed tray tips and speech bug in formatting of text for multiple mode changes. Updated installer to re-use default NSIS uninstall executable. Updated CA root certificates cacert.pem file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 mIRC v7.45 patch ripped by me from v7.42-TE Site: http://ge.tt Sharecode[?]: /67et02a2 Nuked mIRC v7.xx by XenoCoderNuked mIRC v7.xx by Service Manual - AoRE Team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BALTAGY Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 mIRC v7.45 Portable Made With Turbo Studio (Size: 6.33 MB) Site: http://www.mirrorcreator.com Sharecode[?]: /files/1GNJMZGV/mIRC_v7.45.zip_links Thanks Deltafox for the patch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 a note on Deltafox's release: 2016/3/29: v1.7: rip from AoRE + "Patch RegDeleteKey and Value" (from his own words) 2016/4/21: v1.8: v1.7 + rip from TE (with slight variance) To be frank, I cannot be absolutely sure that it is ripping but not just a coincidence, but the fact that he kept functionally same patches from both AoRE & TE, plus his "Loader" & "Patch Host" in earlier release (again from his own words), serve as strong indicators that this is the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltafox Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 3 hours ago, player said: a note on Deltafox's release: 2016/3/29: v1.7: rip from AoRE + "Patch RegDeleteKey and Value" (from his own words) 2016/4/21: v1.8: v1.7 + rip from TE (with slight variance) To be frank, I cannot be absolutely sure that it is ripping but not just a coincidence, but the fact that he kept functionally same patches from both AoRE & TE, plus his "Loader" & "Patch Host" in earlier release (again from his own words), serve as strong indicators that this is the case. v1.8 is totally rewritewhit keygen and whitout loader and host patch and NOT ripped from Aore and TE... I also nullified the points where the soft resets the serial in the register after a certain period of use, usually 30 minutes, improved in the v1.8 .. , does something no other patch .. I say other mirc patch is unregister after 30 min of use. Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 2 hours ago, Deltafox said: v1.8 is totally rewrite and NOT ripped from Aore and TE if it's not ripped, then i assume you know your patch well, may i ask why did you patch twice here, when you only need either one? with reference to v7.44 with v1.8 patch applied file offset: codes patched 0006C5A1: 74 25 => EB 25 (pattern found in TE) 00124630: 0F 84 8E 00 00 00 => 0F 84 00 00 00 00 (pattern found in AoRE) in particular, what does this function that you patched do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 another strange stuff that i've observed: in v1.7 there is a patch at 001042EF: 74 19 5F 33 C0 => 74 00 5F B0 01 (pattern found in AoRE) in v1.8 the patch became 001042EF: 74 19 5F 33 C0 => EB 00 5F B0 01 it is known that TE patches 001042EF: 74 19 => EB 19 it looks to me that you adds TE patch onto v1.7 without bother knowing what's going on? if you did patch there by yourself i don't see why you made a useless change 74 00 to EB 00. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltafox Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Hi player sorry for my bad english.. I have a question for you.. You're part of one of these two teams? I think so. Otherwise I do not understand this obstinacy to your question ..you are calm and peaceful living ...then without me now reverse exe file again to remind all those opcode .. if I remember correctly now it was the first two opcode for the checksum of CheckSumMappedFile sets a value of 1 instead of 3 I ask you: do you know that patches from you indicated does not nullify well because after 30 min is unregistrato mirc? you know tell me why I also nullified in : Quote new byte[] { 0x74, 0x19, 0x5E, 0x33, 0xC0 },//Blocco Azzeramento Reg Seriale new byte[] { 0x74, 0x7E, 0x8D, 0x84, 0x24, 0xC0 },//Blocco Azzeramento Reg Seriale to Quote new byte[] { 0x74, 0x00, 0x5E, 0x33, 0xC0 }, new byte[] { 0x74, 0x00, 0x8D, 0x84, 0x24, 0xC0 }, Even " AoRE " and "TE" if I am not mistaken they have different byte nullificated in common, but what does that mean? I do not come here to do question .. counts the result ... it is normal that many points to nullify are shared. But personally I have not used it ripped neither believe it or not ... Best Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 7 minutes ago, Deltafox said: new byte[] { 0x74, 0x19, 0x5E, 0x33, 0xC0 },//Blocco Azzeramento Reg Seriale new byte[] { 0x74, 0x7E, 0x8D, 0x84, 0x24, 0xC0 },//Blocco Azzeramento Reg Seriale this 2 patches come from your v1.7 "Patch RegDeleteKey and Value" which are not rip. however, if you think this properly fix the unregister within 30 min, why do you add more patches to v1.8? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltafox Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Wrong this two point is only for block reg deleted.. is an additional protection .. otherwise after 30 minutes and a reboot of mirc whit other patch you had to re-register Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 14 minutes ago, Deltafox said: Even " AoRE " and "TE" if I am not mistaken they have different byte nullificated in common there are 6 area of patches in TE, 2 area of patches in AoRE. they do not overlap with each other. (AoRE patches locate close to that of TE but actual bytes patched do not overlap, let alone in common.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltafox Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 18 minutes ago, player said: there are 6 area of patches in TE, 2 area of patches in AoRE. they do not overlap with each other. (AoRE patches locate close to that of TE but actual bytes patched do not overlap, let alone in common.) In fact I was told if I remember correctly .. imagined then how I know them well? some other nulled opcode not present into other patch or at least in TE Quote new byte[] { 0x85, 0xC0, 0x0F, 0x84, 0x0D, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x68 } to Quote new byte[] { 0x85, 0xC0, 0x90, 0xE9, 0x0D, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x68 }, This is all Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 23 minutes ago, Deltafox said: is an additional protection did you know new patches you add to v1.8 made these 2 patches redundant... 38 minutes ago, Deltafox said: if I remember correctly now it was the first two opcode for the checksum of CheckSumMappedFile sets a value of 1 instead of 3 sir, you remember wrongly... it returns 1 for same checksum, 2 for mismatching checksum. I'm done with my interrogation. Sorry for the mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltafox Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 I remembered only in mind of course .. however, it was the checksum but does not change the way .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Final advice, in coding people say Occam's Razor, in simpler term, Less is More. The same should apply to reversing, redundant patch means you are relying on guess work... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltafox Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 everyone has their own opinion .. Quote new byte[] { 0x85, 0xC0, 0x0F, 0x84, 0x0D, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x68 } to Quote new byte[] { 0x85, 0xC0, 0x90, 0xE9, 0x0D, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x68 }, if I do not say inaccuracies, this nulled opcode are missing in other patch or at least I have not seen in your rip .. is for license validated.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiki Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Wow, nice to see some discussions by people who understand much more than the average Joe how patching process works, how assembler works, what are opcodes and clearly how to do create patch (probably how to unpack exe too). I wish I could learn this I only dabbled a little bit back in the day of good old SoftIce. Good day to both of you and keep it going! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 2 hours ago, Deltafox said: this nulled opcode are missing in other patch or at least I have not seen in your rip .. is for license validated.. i thought this is over. this patch is the "slight variance" which i was referring to. 00105B01: 0F 84 0D 01 00 00 => 90 E9 0D 01 00 00 (yours) 00105B7B: 0F 85 93 00 00 00 => 90 E9 93 00 00 00 (TE) 00105B01+6+010D=00105C14 00105B7B+6+0093=00105C14 both jump to the same address. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltafox Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 you thought wrong .. and you did not have the mentioned before and that was made a reverse parallel ..and TE appare not work fine..but this shows that was not ripped more .. if they jump at the same address is because the software that is but by different way and logic.. for me. can publish original TE Patch for 7.4x? I would like to see the .. also in PM if possible tk's... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltafox Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Given the fact that I do not have to prove anything to anyone and that everyone is free to use the patch and want to believe or not .. above all in the presence of several different logic .. .. If you can send me in PM patch TE for 7.4x, I would analyze it .. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltafox Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 talk about area = but it is normal to speak of the same software you said that also aore use same area then aore ripped TE? Can send TE patch or not? I'm interested only analyze it now then you believe me or not does not interest me in the least .. tk's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 then let us finish this through personal message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltafox Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Ok.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.