Petrovic Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Full Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oliverjia Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 100% detection rate? LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrEzi Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 27 minutes ago, oliverjia said: 100% detection rate? LOL ...based on the samples.... of course prepared by whom made and provided the results... But basically yeah --- 100% protection is a placebo or wishful thinking ;] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bytebunny Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 56 minutes ago, oliverjia said: 100% detection rate? LOL even page 2 of the PDF says: We would like to point out that while some products may sometimes be able to reach 100% protection rates in a test, it does not mean that these products will always protect against all threats on the web. It just means that they were able to block 100% of the widespread malicious samples used in a test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straycat19 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 What it is really saying is you give us enough money and we will rig the tests to show your product in a favorable light. I have never trusted AV-Comparatives because it is obvious that their tests are rigged. A more accurate evaluation, without any ranking, is AV-Test.org. They just publish the facts and let the user decide which is best after perusing the results for themselves. Trend Micro and F-Secure beat BitDefender! Only in your dreams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Quote AV-Comparatives: Real-World Protection Test lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RejZoR Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Some of you are missing a bigger picture here. It's not about 100% in this test, it's about consistency over several months. Just look all the real-word tests done by AV-C and observe who is constantly and continuously in top places. Kaspersky, BitDefender, Trend Micro, sometimes AVIRA. Also Panda Free which is for some reason missing here. Sure there is no such thing as 100% detection, but for the given samples, they've detected 100% of them. And sure, one such tests doesn't mean much as scores can fluctuate A LOT. But when more of them have the same pattern, you can form an opinion. Kaspersky sure is damn good. They invest a lot in protection modules, opposed to some other vendors who rather invest in other silly things not even related with protection... Also, these charts that start at 80% are rubbish. Either from 0-100% or don't even bother because visual perception of such charts is entirely skewed and you have to only look at numbers, not graphs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pc71520 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 18 hours ago, RejZoR said: Observe who is constantly and continuously in top places: Kaspersky, BitDefender, Trend Micro, sometimes AVIRA. Also, Panda Free. Absolutely, agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anhbatu Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Just for reference only, does not guarantee the actual ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee loans Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Trend Micro, ThreatTrack Vipre can not at the top and compare with Kaspersky, Bitdefender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 37 minutes ago, anhbatu said: Just for reference only, does not guarantee the actual ! The best reference is you're experience level , If you dont know much about PCs and dont care about it slowing you're system down. I recommended the biggest piece of bloatware on the market with all the bells and whistles. Ive not had no trouble since like 2008 with malware ..So I just keep NOD32 installed just in case , I install my favorite Firewall app separate, also i use a adblocker , script blocker , and some other security enhancing addons and run on demand scans with other antimalware tools from time to time. and it dont slow my system down any . And I've been fine for many years every since I left XP and the x86 platform Ive not needed no real bloated realtime . Before I switched to NOD32 in 2014. i just used Avast Free form 2011 though sometime in 2014 with basically the same set up . Back before 2011 i used Kaspersky when I was on XP.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anhbatu Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 3 hours ago, lee loans said: Trend Micro, ThreatTrack Vipre can not at the top and compare with Kaspersky, Bitdefender. I've used for years and saw the Kaspersky Internet Security it quickly detect malicious websites. I totally believe Kaspersky, it deserves to head the rankings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fretless Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 I am amazed of ESET result. Too low. AVG and Avast better than ESET? I don't think so. 2 minutes ago, fretless said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee loans Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 16 hours ago, fretless said: I am amazed of ESET result. Too low. AVG and Avast better than ESET? I don't think so. I think as you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RejZoR Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 If we are quite honest, NOD32 always felt uninspiring after the transition to version 3.x and upwards. When it had that old narrow and tall interface I remember it was pretty spectacular. And I really liked its looks as well as performance. But now, it's just meh. Quite the same as avast! if I'm honest and I used t be a huge fan of avast!. Then again, despite AVG always being meh, they apparently woke up a bit. Since integration of the behavior analysis module they bumped up protection quite a lot and recent inclusion of proper cloud functionality, they bumped it up even higher. Interface is still stupid as hell with that Zen crap and they still insist on stupid 24 hour update cycles for free version, but they are certainly doing something with detection/protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.