nsane.forums Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Collections society GEMA claims to represent more than 60,000 composers, authors and music publishers worldwide, protecting their copyrights. After a request by the group, The Regional Court in Hamburg has ruled that hosting service Rapidshare is forbidden from making any of 5,000 music tracks from GEMA’s collection available on the Internet.Rapidshare was also ordered to delete any and all of those same tracks from its servers and ensure that they are not uploaded again by users. Previously Rapidshare had been using file hashes to recognize tracks that were already removed after requests from GEMA, to ensure that they weren’t uploaded again. The court decided that the technique used was ineffective.The court found Rapidshare guilty of breaches of copyright law and ordered it to pay damages of €24 million ($34 million).“The decision of the Hamburg Regional Court is a milestone in GEMA’s fight against the illegal use of musical works on the Internet,” said Dr. Harald Heker, Chief Executive Officer of GEMA. “We are confident that in this way we will be able to reduce the illegal use of the GEMA repertoire on the Internet to a negligible level,” he added.Understandably, Rapidshare sought to downplay the ruling. Bobby Chang, COO of RapidShare, Switzerland, said: “We do not consider the court’s decision to be a breakthrough. As other proceedings in similar disputes with GEMA have shown, there is considerable disparity amongst the individual courts in some cases.”Noting that the courts of appeal “tend to restrict the scope of the decisions made by the lower courts,” Chang said it would make more sense to offer music fans the right products and services at the right price to “open up a new source of income for music-markets on the Internet.” View: Original Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HATE9X Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 oooooooooooooooo... PWN3D! :rolleyes:altho filehosters have been useful, only few years ago times were better and content could be downed from servers w/o all these limits and premium acc bs that came with the filehoster boom..some donations and every private forum/community could have their own server for content.. and forget 'please wait, buy premium, ADS bla bla blah'..and like WTF, these hosters are making money mainly 'cos ppl share warez through them, and they know it, but pretend to be saints.. duh.. <.< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marik Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 good!was about time someone shut these guys up a bitrapidshare suckshopefully, someone will shut them down for good some other time....then we won't see other users trying to get rspoints out off other users Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irefay Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Overall I think this is a REALLY bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoKz Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 I think this is a bad thing too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Lite Posted June 24, 2009 Administrator Share Posted June 24, 2009 RapidShare ordered to filter all user uploads View: Original Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambrocious Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 I'm frakked in this situation. I use RapidShare mostly because of the premium account I have and how fast I can download stuff. Now with this, I am wondering if things will suck really badly for all of us with premium accounts. Mine is suppose to be good until Feb of 2010...now I don't think it will be worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.