Jump to content

NIH ‘Vaccinate the Whole Country’ with Experimental Ebola Vaccine


humble3d

Recommended Posts

NIH ‘Vaccinate the Whole Country’ with Experimental Ebola Vaccine

ebola_hazard_vaccine_2-263x164.png

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, wants to vaccinate the whole country with an experimental Ebola vaccine in light of recently Ebola cases in the U.S. He recently told The Canadian Press in an interview:

“As the epidemic gets more and more formidable and in some cases out of control it is quite conceivable, if not likely, that we may need to deploy the vaccine to the entire country to be able to shut the epidemic down. That is clearly a possibility.”

How convenient for the corrupt GlaxoSmithKline who is working as fast as they can to create an experimental, fast-tracked Ebola vaccine. The company was just slapped with a record $489 million fine in China last month after allegations surfaced in the United Arab Emirates of ‘improper payments’ and bribery in several Middle Eastern countries.

They have also been found guilty of reportedly dumping 45 liters of polio virus in a Belgium river, and they are the subject of numerous lawsuits brought about by whistleblowers for ‘bad medicine.’ Cheryl Eckard, for example, a former employee for the pharmaceutical giant, has exposed GlaxoSmithKline’s fraudulent practices of delivering contaminated drugs – some even full of harmful bacteria – to the public.

Yet – this is the company that the U.S. government wants us to trust for an Ebola vaccine?

Furthermore, Jon Rappaport has revealed that the standard test for diagnosing Ebola (PCR) is ‘completely misleading and useless.’

He continues:

“. . . when the authorities report there are 6000 cases of Ebola and 3000 deaths, or when they report that two patients in the US have Ebola, they’re relying on a diagnostic test that can’t confirm any of these assertions is true. This is verified in spades by a Dept. of Defense manual.”

The manual he refers to is “Ebola Zaire (EZ1) rRT-PCR (TaqMan®) Assay on ABI 7500 Fast Dx, LightCycler, & JBAIDS: INSTRUCTION BOOKLET,” published by “Joint Project Manager Medical Countermeasures Systems,” dated 14 August 2014.

He quotes from the manual:

“…the EZ1 assay [the PCR test] should not be performed unless the individual has been exposed to or is at risk for exposure to Ebola Zaire virus or has signs and symptoms of infection with Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) that meet clinical and epidemiologic criteria for testing suspect specimens.”

There are numerous ‘Ebola’ strains, however, and the Zaire test wouldn’t come up positive anyhow if someone had a different virus.

Regardless of this inconclusive test for Ebola Tom Frieden, the head of the CDC, gave a press conference last week concerning “the Dallas Ebola patient,” in which he assured all of us that the patient had Ebola, because the ‘very accurate’ PCR test had been run.

Meanwhile, Fauci is dropping nationalized vaccination comments like its no big deal – sure, he meant it for Africa, but is the plan to force vaccinations of an untested, live-virus vaccine on the entire U.S. population next?

Interestingly, the people of West Africa have a strong disbelief in the reality of this Ebola crisis. They think that these Ebola outbreaks were caused by the United States Department of Defense, which was in the Ebola hot zones of West Africa performing bio-warfare research on Ebola and other viruses. They think that Ebola is so fake, in fact, that the people are now literally drenched in an ‘Ebola is Real’ campaign, where they can’t even take a phone call without being told that Ebola is real.

Will a vaccine soon come to us in the United States for a fake pandemic? Either way, will we all be forced to take it? Let us know what you think of this controversial issue.

Additional Sources:

NPR

Source:

http://naturalsociety.com/nih-united-states-experimental-ebola-vaccine/#ixzz3H4bLM19x

Follow us: @naturalsociety on Twitter | NaturalSociety on Facebook Author: Christina Sarich

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 17
  • Views 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Noun - epidemic:
A widespread outbreak of an infectious disease; many people are infected at the same time

Noun - pandemic:
An epidemic that is geographically widespread; occurring throughout a region or even throughout the world

Lots of fear-porn floating around to terrorize folks - but no solid proof as yet that either condition is occuring...?

Seems more like just another profitable enterprise for the super-rich to keep 'milking' the herd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Future Soldier

Damn its experimental dont say sideffects have aids (can you trust NIH)

all mt native westerners please stay safe :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites


come on folks get a f'in clue. this is nothing but hype to keep from going and voting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The vaccine uses a common cold virus genetically engineered to carry a tiny piece of Ebola DNA. Sprayed up the nose, it saved all nine monkeys tested for infection.


But now the research is dead in the water without funding, Maria Croyle of the University of Texas at Austin’s College of Pharmacy said.




Doesn't look like we will be taking that any time soon......

Link to comment
Share on other sites


someone please close and remove this thread. if you're worried about something that effects less than .000001% of the worlds population you are a moron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


..... but it is still a large issue in Africa and needs to be addressed by our countries...despite what you think...this disease is destroying entire countries where it is pandemic and has the potential to destroy all of africa...again ...despite what you think

Link to comment
Share on other sites


For The Wise...

Any breathable micro nano particle(s) will effect and affect the target audience...

The use of nanotechnology in medicine, Warfare and more specifically drug delivery is set to spread rapidly. Currently many substances are under investigation for drug delivery and more specifically for cancer therapy. Interestingly pharmaceutical sciences are using nanoparticles to reduce toxicity and side effects of drugs and up to recently did not realize that carrier systems themselves may impose risks to the patient. The kind of hazards that are introduced by using nanoparticles for drug delivery are beyond that posed by conventional hazards imposed by chemicals in classical delivery matrices...


For a concise example, Consider the following:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3307608/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527668/
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 month later...

..... but it is still a large issue in Africa and needs to be addressed by our countries...despite what you think...this disease is destroying entire countries where it is pandemic and has the potential to destroy all of africa...again ...despite what you think

In October 2014, a WHO official had predicted there could be 10,000 new cases per week, within two months. Thankfully, that fearmonger was wrong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


..... but it is still a large issue in Africa and needs to be addressed by our countries...despite what you think...this disease is destroying entire countries where it is pandemic and has the potential to destroy all of africa...again ...despite what you think

In October 2014, a WHO official had predicted there could be 10,000 new cases per week, within two months. Thankfully, that fearmonger was wrong...

that fear monger would have been correct if he kept silent.......because he was so vocal and other people like him spoke out and spoke loud.... it caused the rest of the world to step in to help stop the spread of the virus BEFORE it became epidemic in the rest of the world...up until that point in time the rest of the world was doing nothing at ground zero

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...