fredlaso Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 Amazons Fire phone now only costs $1 if you buy it with a 2-year AT&T contract. When it launched a few months ago, it was $199. If only it had been priced at $1 when it launched in July, perhaps it wouldnt have been such a failure. Although Amazon isnt releasing official numbers on units sold, the company did mention in its Q3 report today that its taking a $170 million charge on inventory commitments, and that the massive hit is largely due the Fire phones dismal sales. The company said its currently stuck with $83 million worth of unsold Fire phones. Thats a whole lot of phones sitting in warehouses, looking for good homes. The Fire phone had potential, and could have at least broken even. But it started out with a few key (and seemingly obvious) mistakes. Most critically, it was overpriced for what it offered. Even with the one-year membership of Amazon Prime (valued at $99), it failed to deliver what consumers want: quality apps on quality hardware. By loading the phone with a stripped-down, custom version of Android, Amazon limited Fire users to a small app store and its own pre-installed software. Also, the phone feels cheap and flimsy when compared to an iPhone or other similarly priced Android devices. To offset those shortcomings, Amazon loaded the Fire phone with a colorful and flashy interface that uses four cameras to give the homescreen a 3D-ish trick called Dynamic Perspective. The Fire phone also got another trick: Firefly, a custom app that helps you buy things by just pointing the camera at the object you want to load into your Amazon cart. Although interesting on a technical level, the gimmicks didnt pay off. The Dynamic Perspective trick is not particularly attractive. And Firefly is just plain creepy, too close to advertising. Smartphones have become a combination of a little black book, an entertainment device, and a social companion, so paying $200 for a phone whos only real unique feature was to serve as a vehicle for buying things was a non-starter. The Fire phones product page at Amazon lists over 3,000 user reviews, mostly negativethe average rating is two out of five stars. http://www.wired.com/2014/10/fire-phone-a-failure/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CODYQX4 Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 Was there any doubt that this was going to bomb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 This is what happens when a online shopping site want to be multitalented. You are there to sell phones not to build phones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catoja Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 HUGE MISTAKE... Why, i ask, why??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
software182 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Live for nothing or die trying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.