Jump to content

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo


humble3d

Recommended Posts

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.

"A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now 'available', not having [a] sexual partner," the judge said.

"If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you'd invariably have, they would say it's unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone."

Judge Neilson made the comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when she was 10 or 11 years old in 1973 or 1974 but has pleaded not guilty to charges relating to sex they had in 1981, when she was 18 and he was 26.

"By that stage they are both mature adults," the judge said.

"The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become 'free' when the second relationship broke down. The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we've come a long way from the 1950s – when the position of the English Common Law was that sex outside marriage was not lawful."

The comments were labelled misogynistic and "completely disgraceful" by Sally Dowling, the crown prosecutor, who has asked an appeal court to appoint another judge.

"The reference to abortion is particularly repellent," she said.

Dr Cathy Kezelman, an advocate for preventing child sex abuse, said incest was horrific, regardless of the ages of those involved.

"The relational betrayal of the horrors of incest between a brother and sister of any age is abhorrently criminal," she told The Sydney Morning Herald.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/10958728/Australian-judge-says-incest-may-no-longer-be-a-taboo.html

:s

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 5
  • Views 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • humble3d

    1

  • dcs18

    1

  • KamenRiderBlack

    1

  • Son-of-Sam

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

KamenRiderBlack

Whack Judge, probably a liberal.

Edited by KamenRiderBlack
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

A taboo is a social decision - it cannot be a proclamation by some judge (like a court order or fatwa.) :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


ricktendo64

Whack Judge, probably a liberal.

Judge may be liberal, but he is ruling in favor of republicans (I don't see many liberals marrying their sisters/cousins :P)

Edited by ricktendo64
Link to comment
Share on other sites


As dcs18 said that taboo is decided by your social surroundings, in many cultures these days, it's legal and socially acceptable to marry your cousin/second cousin and so on, so i think that yes, incest might no longer be a taboo in certain cultures.. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...